These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19738497)

  • 1. Preferential processing of tactile events under conditions of divided attention.
    Hanson JV; Whitaker D; Heron J
    Neuroreport; 2009 Oct; 20(15):1392-6. PubMed ID: 19738497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cross-modal distraction by deviance: functional similarities between the auditory and tactile modalities.
    Ljungberg JK; Parmentier FB
    Exp Psychol; 2012; 59(6):355-63. PubMed ID: 22750743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tri-modal integration of visual, tactile and auditory signals for the perception of sequences of events.
    Bresciani JP; Dammeier F; Ernst MO
    Brain Res Bull; 2008 Apr; 75(6):753-60. PubMed ID: 18394521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mutual influences of intermodal visual/tactile apparent motion and auditory motion with uncrossed and crossed arms.
    Jiang Y; Chen L
    Multisens Res; 2013; 26(1-2):19-51. PubMed ID: 23713198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Signal reliability modulates auditory-tactile integration for event counting.
    Bresciani JP; Ernst MO
    Neuroreport; 2007 Jul; 18(11):1157-61. PubMed ID: 17589318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lost in the move? Secondary task performance impairs tactile change detection on the body.
    Gallace A; Zeeden S; Röder B; Spence C
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):215-29. PubMed ID: 19647451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ERP correlates of tactile spatial attention differ under intra- and intermodal conditions.
    Forster B; Sambo CF; Pavone EF
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec; 82(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 19665517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modality-switching in the Simon task: The clash of reference frames.
    Ruzzoli M; Soto-Faraco S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Oct; 146(10):1478-1497. PubMed ID: 28639796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of automatic orienting of attention towards ipsilesional stimuli in non-visual (tactile and auditory) neglect: a critical review.
    Gainotti G
    Cortex; 2010 Feb; 46(2):150-60. PubMed ID: 19501350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Supporting interruption management and multimodal interface design: three meta-analyses of task performance as a function of interrupting task modality.
    Lu SA; Wickens CD; Prinet JC; Hutchins SD; Sarter N; Sebok A
    Hum Factors; 2013 Aug; 55(4):697-724. PubMed ID: 23964412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Seeing the light: exploring the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 180(4):737-54. PubMed ID: 17333012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of perceptual load on tactile spatial attention: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Gherri E; Berreby F
    Brain Res; 2017 Oct; 1673():42-51. PubMed ID: 28803830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vision and Haptics Share Spatial Attentional Resources and Visuotactile Integration Is Not Affected by High Attentional Load.
    Wahn B; König P
    Multisens Res; 2015; 28(3-4):371-92. PubMed ID: 26288905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychomotor speed in hypertension: effects of reaction time components, stimulus modality, and phase of the cardiac cycle.
    Edwards L; Ring C; McIntyre D; Carroll D; Martin U
    Psychophysiology; 2007 May; 44(3):459-68. PubMed ID: 17433098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adult developmental trajectories of pseudoneglect in the tactile, visual and auditory modalities and the influence of starting position and stimulus length.
    Brooks JL; Darling S; Malvaso C; Della Sala S
    Brain Cogn; 2016 Mar; 103():12-22. PubMed ID: 26799680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tactile perception during action observation.
    Vastano R; Inuggi A; Vargas CD; Baud-Bovy G; Jacono M; Pozzo T
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 234(9):2585-94. PubMed ID: 27161552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cross-modal psychological refractory period in vision, audition, and haptics.
    Rau PP; Zheng J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1573-1585. PubMed ID: 32052346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mask stimulus triggers inhibition in subliminal visuomotor priming.
    Boy F; Clarke K; Sumner P
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 190(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 18682922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Early auditory change detection implicitly facilitated by ignored concurrent visual change during a Braille reading task.
    Aoyama A; Haruyama T; Kuriki S
    J Integr Neurosci; 2013 Sep; 12(3):385-99. PubMed ID: 24070061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.