These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19738583)

  • 21. Socio-economic status and utilisation of orthodontic services in a Nigerian hospital.
    Adeyemi AT; Aderiokun GA; Denloye OO
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Jun; 31(122):27-33. PubMed ID: 19007094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Stalpers MJ; Booij JW; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Katsaros C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 17826599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Space planning sensitivity and specificity: Royal London Space Planning and Korkhaus Analyses.
    Dause R; Cobourne M; McDonald F
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 20575199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Investigation of pre- and post-treatment cephalometric measurements of the subjects treated by Edgewise technique].
    Erdem A; Deniz E; Ceylan I
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1990 Apr; 3(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 2101658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Uvulo-glosso-pharyngeal dimensions in different anteroposterior skeletal patterns.
    Abu Allhaija ES; Al-Khateeb SN
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1012-8. PubMed ID: 16448247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Distribution of malocclusion types in 7-9-year-old Iranian children.
    Danaie SM; Asadi Z; Salehi P
    East Mediterr Health J; 2006; 12(1-2):236-40. PubMed ID: 17037244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Predictive value of morphologic parameters for successful correction of Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
    Zentner A; Peylo S; Brothag D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 12637900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of the treatment results of Class II division 1 obtained by elastic activator].
    Demirović D; Filipović M
    Bilt Udruz Ortodonata Jugosl; 1989; 22(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 2638168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Cephalometric study of the results of orthodontic treatment of Class III malocclusion].
    Antonini A; Vichi M; Defraia E
    Stomatol Mediterr; 1989; 9(2):159-69. PubMed ID: 2639521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Anomalies of the inclination of the occlusal plane: early treatment using indirect guide-planes--electromyographic response].
    Santana Penin UA; Mora Bermúdez MJ; Fraga Bermúdez JM; Raymond JL
    Orthod Fr; 1992; 63 Pt 2():619-33. PubMed ID: 1341755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The Bimzat skeletal activator in the treatment of Angle Class I, II and III malocclusions in the mixed dentition].
    Genone B
    Dent Cadmos; 1985 Dec; 53(20):17-25, 29-32, 35-9 passim. PubMed ID: 3869560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Surgical influence of occlusal plane (2)].
    Reyneke JP; Evans WG
    Quintessenz; 1991 Jun; 42(6):945-52. PubMed ID: 1961908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Improving lip aesthetics in the face profile after treatment of class II, division 2 malocclusion.
    Koniarova Z; Husarova R; Stefkova M; Spidlen M; Statelova D; Janickova M; Koniarova A
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2022; 123(3):185-190. PubMed ID: 35343750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Analysis--concepts and values. Part I.
    Gebeck TR
    J Charles H. Tweed Int Found; 1989 Apr; 17():19-48. PubMed ID: 2634693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordanian sample.
    Al-Khateeb SN; Abu Alhaija ES
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):459-65. PubMed ID: 16637727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Occlusal and cephalometric Class II Division 1 malocclusion severity in patients treated with and without extraction of 2 maxillary premolars.
    Janson G; Graciano JT; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A; Pinzan-Vercelino CR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):759-67. PubMed ID: 16769494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Research of cranio-occlusional change of skeletal class III malocclusion in permanent dentition treated by the multiloop edgewise arch wire technique].
    Jin CW; Lin JX; Xu BH
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Jun; 22(3):216-9. PubMed ID: 15293468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Cephalometric analysis of the results of orthopedic and orthodontic treatment in skeletal Angle Class III].
    Manhartsberger C; Richter M
    Z Stomatol; 1988 Feb; 85(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 3166323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on class I and class II subjects.
    Basciftci FA; Usumez S
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 12607853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Orthodontic and surgical considerations in use of the mandibular sagittal ramus split for class II skeletal anomalies.
    Kraal ER; Valk PJ
    J Oral Surg; 1981 Nov; 39(11):842-8. PubMed ID: 6945410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.