161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19738939)
1. Effect of biofunctionalized implant surface on osseointegration: a histomorphometric study in dogs.
Barros RR; Novaes AB; Papalexiou V; Souza SL; Taba M; Palioto DB; Grisi MF
Braz Dent J; 2009; 20(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 19738939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of implant surface properties on peri-implant bone healing: a histological and histomorphometric study in dogs.
Al-Hamdan K; Al-Moaber SH; Junker R; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Apr; 22(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 21561482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of implant microstructure on the osseointegration of immediate implants placed in periodontally infected sites. A histomorphometric study in dogs.
Novaes AB; Papalexiou V; Grisi MF; Souza SS; Taba M; Kajiwara JK
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Feb; 15(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 14731175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Osseointegration around dental implants biofunctionalized with TGFβ-1 inhibitor peptides: an in vivo study in beagle dogs.
Cirera A; Sevilla P; Manzanares MC; Franch J; Galindo-Moreno P; Gil J
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2020 Jul; 31(8):62. PubMed ID: 32696084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiographic evaluation of dental implants with different surface treatments: an experimental study in dogs.
Taba Júnior M; Novaes AB; Souza SL; Grisi MF; Palioto DB; Pardini LC
Implant Dent; 2003; 12(3):252-8. PubMed ID: 14560486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits.
Le Guehennec L; Goyenvalle E; Lopez-Heredia MA; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vivo evaluation of biofunctionalized implant surfaces with a synthetic peptide (P-15) and its impact on osseointegration. A preclinical animal study.
Schmitt CM; Koepple M; Moest T; Neumann K; Weisel T; Schlegel KA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Nov; 27(11):1339-1348. PubMed ID: 26567087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometric study in canine mandibles.
Bornstein MM; Valderrama P; Jones AA; Wilson TG; Seibl R; Cochran DL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 18177427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. II. Histologic analysis.
Stentz WC; Mealey BL; Gunsolley JC; Waldrop TC
J Periodontol; 1997 Oct; 68(10):933-49. PubMed ID: 9358360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biofunctionalization of titanium implants with a biomimetic active peptide (P-15) promotes early osseointegration.
Lutz R; Srour S; Nonhoff J; Weisel T; Damien CJ; Schlegel KA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul; 21(7):726-34. PubMed ID: 20636727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enhanced bone apposition around biofunctionalized sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs.
Germanier Y; Tosatti S; Broggini N; Textor M; Buser D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Jun; 17(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 16672019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Guided bone regeneration around titanium plasma-sprayed, acid-etched, and hydroxyapatite-coated implants in the canine model.
Conner KA; Sabatini R; Mealey BL; Takacs VJ; Mills MP; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2003 May; 74(5):658-68. PubMed ID: 12816298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. I. Radiographic analysis.
Stentz WC; Mealey BL; Nummikoski PV; Gunsolley JC; Waldrop TC
J Periodontol; 1997 Mar; 68(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 9100194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of a new dental implant bioactive surface: histological and histomorphometric comparative study in minipigs.
Herrero-Climent M; Romero Ruizª MM; Calvo PL; Santos JVR; Perez RA; Gil Mur FJ
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr; 22(3):1423-1432. PubMed ID: 29022215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vivo evaluation of cp Ti implants with modified surfaces by laser beam with and without hydroxyapatite chemical deposition and without and with thermal treatment: topographic characterization and histomorphometric analysis in rabbits.
Queiroz TP; de Molon RS; Souza FÁ; Margonar R; Thomazini AH; Guastaldi AC; Hochuli-Vieira E
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):685-699. PubMed ID: 27530186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets.
Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ
J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted, large-grit and acid-etched implant surfaces at sites with coronal circumferential defects: an experimental study in dogs.
Lai HC; Zhuang LF; Zhang ZY; Wieland M; Liu X
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Mar; 20(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 19397636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vivo osseointegration of dental implants with an antimicrobial peptide coating.
Chen X; Zhou XC; Liu S; Wu RF; Aparicio C; Wu JY
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2017 May; 28(5):76. PubMed ID: 28386851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomimetic calcium phosphate composite coating of dental implants.
Schliephake H; Scharnweber D; Roesseler S; Dard M; Sewing A; Aref A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):738-46. PubMed ID: 17066635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of alendronate in peri-implant defect regeneration.
Meraw SJ; Reeve CM; Wollan PC
J Periodontol; 1999 Feb; 70(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 10102552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
