227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19739762)
1. Speech production modifications produced in the presence of low-pass and high-pass filtered noise.
Lu Y; Cooke M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1495-9. PubMed ID: 19739762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine structure degradation on speech masking release.
Gnansia D; Péan V; Meyer B; Lorenzi C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4023-33. PubMed ID: 19507983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Human Frequency Following Responses to Filtered Speech.
Ananthakrishnan S; Grinstead L; Yurjevich D
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(1):87-105. PubMed ID: 33369591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spectral and temporal changes to speech produced in the presence of energetic and informational maskers.
Cooke M; Lu Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2059-69. PubMed ID: 20968376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing.
Strelcyk O; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3328-45. PubMed ID: 19425674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acoustic-phonetic characteristics of speech produced with communicative intent to counter adverse listening conditions.
Hazan V; Baker R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2139-52. PubMed ID: 21973368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acoustic markers of sarcasm in Cantonese and English.
Cheang HS; Pell MD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1394-405. PubMed ID: 19739753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hybridizing conversational and clear speech to determine the degree of contribution of acoustic features to intelligibility.
Kain A; Amano-Kusumoto A; Hosom JP
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2308-19. PubMed ID: 19062869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contribution of high-frequency information to the acceptance of background noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Plyler PN; Madix SG; Thelin JW; Johnston KW
Am J Audiol; 2007 Dec; 16(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 18056883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Loud speech in realistic environmental noise: phonetogram data, perceptual voice quality, subjective ratings, and gender differences in healthy speakers.
Södersten M; Ternström S; Bohman M
J Voice; 2005 Mar; 19(1):29-46. PubMed ID: 15766848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of shouted speech in noise: human and machine.
Pohjalainen J; Raitio T; Yrttiaho S; Alku P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2377-89. PubMed ID: 23556603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech-perception-in-noise deficits in dyslexia.
Ziegler JC; Pech-Georgel C; George F; Lorenzi C
Dev Sci; 2009 Sep; 12(5):732-45. PubMed ID: 19702766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Audio-vocal responses of vocal fundamental frequency and formant during sustained vowel vocalizations in different noises.
Lee SH; Hsiao TY; Lee GS
Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():1-6. PubMed ID: 25749240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship between masking levels and phonatory stability in normal-speaking women.
Ferrand CT
J Voice; 2006 Jun; 20(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 16157468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of speech noise on vocal fundamental frequency using power spectral analysis.
Lee GS; Hsiao TY; Yang CC; Kuo TB
Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 17485983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of sound immersion and communicative interaction on the Lombard effect.
Garnier M; Henrich N; Dubois D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 53(3):588-608. PubMed ID: 20008681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of short-term auditory masking on fundamental frequency variability.
Rastatter M; Rivers C
J Aud Res; 1983 Jan; 23(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 6677636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of multitalker and masker noise on fundamental frequency variability during spontaneous speech for children and adults.
Rivers C; Rastatter MP
J Aud Res; 1985 Jan; 25(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 3836994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech production modifications produced by competing talkers, babble, and stationary noise.
Lu Y; Cooke M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3261-75. PubMed ID: 19045809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech in noise.
McColl DA
J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):605-15. PubMed ID: 16377128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
