These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19739901)

  • 1. Tacit verification of determinate and indeterminate text ideas.
    Singer M
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Sep; 63(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 19739901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrophysiological evidence for the time-course of verifying text ideas.
    Ferretti TR; Singer M; Patterson C
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):881-8. PubMed ID: 18675957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The propositional structure of discourse in the two cerebral hemispheres.
    Long DL; Baynes K; Prat CS
    Brain Lang; 2005 Dec; 95(3):383-94. PubMed ID: 16298668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension.
    Tooley KM; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):19-45. PubMed ID: 19210079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hemispheric asymmetries in discourse processing: evidence from false memories for lists and texts.
    Ben-Artzi E; Faust M; Moeller E
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(2):430-8. PubMed ID: 18951910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Text skimming: the process and effectiveness of foraging through text under time pressure.
    Duggan GB; Payne SJ
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Sep; 15(3):228-42. PubMed ID: 19751073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comprehending narratives containing flashbacks: evidence for temporally organized representations.
    Claus B; Kelter S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1031-44. PubMed ID: 16938044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Set-shifting and the on-line processing of relative clauses in Parkinson's disease: results from a novel eye-tracking method.
    Hochstadt J
    Cortex; 2009 Sep; 45(8):991-1011. PubMed ID: 19473654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence for dissociable neural mechanisms underlying inference generation in familiar and less-familiar scenarios.
    Sundermeier BA; Virtue SM; Marsolek CJ; van den Broek P
    Brain Lang; 2005 Dec; 95(3):402-13. PubMed ID: 16298670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The selective directed forgetting effect: can people forget only part of a text?
    Delaney PF; Nghiem KN; Waldum ER
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1542-50. PubMed ID: 19370484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Representational change and analogy: how analogical inferences alter target representations.
    Blanchette I; Dunbar K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):672-85. PubMed ID: 12109761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Memory-based processing as a mechanism of automaticity in text comprehension.
    Rawson KA; Middleton EL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):353-70. PubMed ID: 19271851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chinese subject-relative clauses are more difficult to process than the object-relative clauses.
    Chen B; Ning A; Bi H; Dunlap S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 18538740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The processing of subject and object relative clauses in Spanish: an eye-tracking study.
    Betancort M; Carreiras M; Sturt P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):1915-29. PubMed ID: 19424908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inferences about action engage action systems.
    Taylor LJ; Lev-Ari S; Zwaan RA
    Brain Lang; 2008 Oct; 107(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 17935771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hemispheric processing of anaphoric inferences: the activation of multiple antecedents.
    Virtue S; van den Broek P
    Brain Lang; 2005 Jun; 93(3):327-37. PubMed ID: 15862857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Extremely selective attention: eye-tracking studies of the dynamic allocation of attention to stimulus features in categorization.
    Blair MR; Watson MR; Walshe RC; Maj F
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1196-206. PubMed ID: 19686015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Morphophonological influences on the comprehension of subject-verb agreement: an ERP study.
    Severens E; Jansma BM; Hartsuiker RJ
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1228():135-44. PubMed ID: 18634765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The pretesting effect: do unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance learning?
    Richland LE; Kornell N; Kao LS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Sep; 15(3):243-57. PubMed ID: 19751074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semantic involvement in reading aloud: evidence from a nonword training study.
    McKay A; Davis C; Savage G; Castles A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1495-517. PubMed ID: 18980410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.