These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19740114)

  • 1. The representation of healthcare end users' perspectives by surrogates in healthcare decisions: a literature review.
    Shah SG; Farrow A; Robinson I
    Scand J Caring Sci; 2009 Dec; 23(4):809-19. PubMed ID: 19740114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Trial of Ascertaining Individual Preferences for Loved Ones' Role in End-of-Life Decisions (TAILORED) Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Surrogate Decision Making.
    Sulmasy DP; Hughes MT; Yenokyan G; Kub J; Terry PB; Astrow AB; Johnson JA; Ho G; Nolan MT
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2017 Oct; 54(4):455-465. PubMed ID: 28712987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perspectives of self-direction: a systematic review of key areas contributing to service users' engagement and choice-making in self-directed disability services and supports.
    Lakhani A; McDonald D; Zeeman H
    Health Soc Care Community; 2018 May; 26(3):295-313. PubMed ID: 27641903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incapacitated Surrogates: A New and Increasing Dilemma in Hospital Care.
    Smith KL; Fedel P; Heitman J
    J Clin Ethics; 2017; 28(4):279-289. PubMed ID: 29257763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Developing medical device technologies from users' perspectives: a theoretical framework for involving users in the development process.
    Shah SG; Robinson I; AlShawi S
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Oct; 25(4):514-21. PubMed ID: 19845981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patient and surrogate disagreement in end-of-life decisions: can surrogates accurately predict patients' preferences?
    Marks MA; Arkes HR
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(4):524-31. PubMed ID: 18566485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study of contemporary user involvement within healthcare systems across England, Poland and Slovenia.
    Lichon M; Kavcic M; Masterson D
    J Health Organ Manag; 2015; 29(5):625-36. PubMed ID: 26222881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploring the factors that influence the decision to adopt and engage with an integrated assistive telehealth and telecare service in Cambridgeshire, UK: a nested qualitative study of patient 'users' and 'non-users'.
    Cook EJ; Randhawa G; Sharp C; Ali N; Guppy A; Barton G; Bateman A; Crawford-White J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Apr; 16():137. PubMed ID: 27095102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. From users involvement to users' needs understanding: a case study.
    Niès J; Pelayo S
    Int J Med Inform; 2010 Apr; 79(4):e76-82. PubMed ID: 19660983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. User participation in healthcare IT development: a developers' viewpoint in Finland.
    Martikainen S; Korpela M; Tiihonen T
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Mar; 83(3):189-200. PubMed ID: 24382475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. User involvement in healthcare technology development and assessment: structured literature review.
    Shah SG; Robinson I
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv; 2006; 19(6-7):500-15. PubMed ID: 17100220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Dyadic Perspective on Engagement in Advance Care Planning.
    Fried T; Zenoni M; Iannone L
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2017 Jan; 65(1):172-178. PubMed ID: 27910091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review.
    Shalowitz DI; Garrett-Mayer E; Wendler D
    Arch Intern Med; 2006 Mar; 166(5):493-7. PubMed ID: 16534034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Care of Patients at the End of Life: Surrogate Decision Making for Incapacitated Patients.
    Patel AV; Ackermann RJ
    FP Essent; 2016 Aug; 447():32-41. PubMed ID: 27490071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surrogate decision making: do we have to trade off accuracy and procedural satisfaction?
    Frey R; Hertwig R; Herzog SM
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Feb; 34(2):258-69. PubMed ID: 23360917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mental health service users' experiences of mental health care: an integrative literature review.
    Newman D; O'Reilly P; Lee SH; Kennedy C
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2015 Apr; 22(3):171-82. PubMed ID: 25707898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of completing a surrogacy information and decision-making tool upon admission to an intensive care unit on length of stay and charges.
    Hatler CW; Grove C; Strickland S; Barron S; White BD
    J Clin Ethics; 2012; 23(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 22822700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Delphi study to identify healthcare users' priorities for cancer care in Greece.
    Efstathiou N; Ameen J; Coll AM
    Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2008 Sep; 12(4):362-71. PubMed ID: 18547866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.