BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19740580)

  • 1. Comparison of two techniques of cinch suturing to avoid widening of the base of the nose after Le Fort I osteotomy.
    Rauso R; Gherardini G; Santillo V; Biondi P; Santagata M; Tartaro G
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 48(5):356-9. PubMed ID: 19740580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of the alar base cinch suture in Le Fort I osteotomy: is it effective?
    Howley C; Ali N; Lee R; Cox S
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 49(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 20304541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy and stability of the alar base cinch suture.
    Stewart A; Edler RJ
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 49(8):623-6. PubMed ID: 21489664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subnasal modified Le Fort I for nasolabial aesthetics improvement.
    Becelli R; De Ponte FS; Fadda MT; Govoni FA; Iannetti G
    J Craniofac Surg; 1996 Sep; 7(5):399-402. PubMed ID: 9133854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional evaluation of the alar cinch suture after Le Fort I osteotomy.
    van Loon B; Verhamme L; Xi T; de Koning MJ; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 45(10):1309-14. PubMed ID: 27269221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The stability of an alar cinch suture after Le Fort I and mandibular osteotomies in Japanese patients with Class III malocclusions.
    Shoji T; Muto T; Takahashi M; Akizuki K; Tsuchida Y
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 50(4):361-4. PubMed ID: 21621313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of alar cinch sutures and V-Y closure on soft tissue dynamics after Le Fort I intrusion osteotomies.
    Muradin MS; Rosenberg A; van der Bilt A; Stoelinga PJ; Koole R
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 37(6):334-40. PubMed ID: 19477655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective study on the effect of modified alar cinch sutures and V-Y closure versus simple closing sutures on nasolabial changes after Le Fort I intrusion and advancement osteotomies.
    Muradin MS; Seubring K; Stoelinga PJ; vd Bilt A; Koole R; Rosenberg AJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 69(3):870-6. PubMed ID: 20727648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term stability of limiting nasal alar base width changes with a cinch suture following Le Fort I osteotomy with submental intubation.
    Raithatha R; Naini FB; Patel S; Sherriff M; Witherow H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 46(11):1372-1379. PubMed ID: 28669485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tip upturning and maxillary advancement: the UT angle.
    Tartaro G; Santagata M; Corzo L; Rauso R
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Sep; 19(5):1387-90. PubMed ID: 18812869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is the Pyriform Ligament Important for Alar Width Maintenance After Le Fort I Osteotomy?
    Peacock ZS; Susarla SM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 73(12 Suppl):S57-66. PubMed ID: 26608155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative analysis of two different alar base sutures after Le Fort I osteotomy: randomized double-blind controlled trial.
    Ritto FG; Medeiros PJ; de Moraes M; Ribeiro DP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Feb; 111(2):181-9. PubMed ID: 20656527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of two alar base suture techniques suture techniques on nasolabial changes after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery in Taiwanese patients with class III malocclusions.
    Chen CY; Lin CC; Ko EW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 44(7):816-22. PubMed ID: 25825373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between the classical and a modified trans-septal technique of alar cinching for Le Fort I osteotomies: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Nirvikalpa N; Narayanan V; Wahab A; Ramadorai A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 22771085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Effect of alar base cinch suture based on anatomic landmarks on the morphology of nasolabial region in patients after orthognathic surgery].
    Zhang W; Liu XJ; Li ZL; Zhang Y
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2023 Aug; 55(4):736-742. PubMed ID: 37534660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modified alar base cinch suture fixation at the bilateral lower border of the piriform rim after a maxillary Le Fort I osteotomy.
    Yen CY; Kuo CL; Liu IH; Su WC; Jiang HR; Huang IG; Liu SY; Lee SY
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Nov; 45(11):1459-1463. PubMed ID: 27364371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative use of photography in orthognathic outcome assessment.
    Edler RJ; Wertheim D; Greenhill D; Jaisinghani A
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 49(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 19804924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of soft tissue morphologic changes after using the alar base cinch suture in Le Fort I osteotomy in mandibular prognathism with and without asymmetry.
    Moroi A; Ishihara Y; Sotobori M; Nakazawa R; Higuchi M; Nakano Y; Marukawa K; Ueki K
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):718-24. PubMed ID: 24424271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subnasal modified Le Fort I osteotomy: indications and results.
    Fernández Sanromán J; Costas López A; Fernández Ferro M; Arenaz Bua J; López de Sánchez A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 42(4):347-50. PubMed ID: 24525028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of three surgical techniques for controlling nasal width after Le Fort I osteotomy].
    Wang ZQ; Wang XX; Li ZL; Yi B; Liang C; Wang X
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Feb; 47(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 25686338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.