These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19740580)
1. Comparison of two techniques of cinch suturing to avoid widening of the base of the nose after Le Fort I osteotomy. Rauso R; Gherardini G; Santillo V; Biondi P; Santagata M; Tartaro G Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 48(5):356-9. PubMed ID: 19740580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of the alar base cinch suture in Le Fort I osteotomy: is it effective? Howley C; Ali N; Lee R; Cox S Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 49(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 20304541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy and stability of the alar base cinch suture. Stewart A; Edler RJ Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 49(8):623-6. PubMed ID: 21489664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Subnasal modified Le Fort I for nasolabial aesthetics improvement. Becelli R; De Ponte FS; Fadda MT; Govoni FA; Iannetti G J Craniofac Surg; 1996 Sep; 7(5):399-402. PubMed ID: 9133854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional evaluation of the alar cinch suture after Le Fort I osteotomy. van Loon B; Verhamme L; Xi T; de Koning MJ; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 45(10):1309-14. PubMed ID: 27269221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The stability of an alar cinch suture after Le Fort I and mandibular osteotomies in Japanese patients with Class III malocclusions. Shoji T; Muto T; Takahashi M; Akizuki K; Tsuchida Y Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 50(4):361-4. PubMed ID: 21621313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of alar cinch sutures and V-Y closure on soft tissue dynamics after Le Fort I intrusion osteotomies. Muradin MS; Rosenberg A; van der Bilt A; Stoelinga PJ; Koole R J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 37(6):334-40. PubMed ID: 19477655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective study on the effect of modified alar cinch sutures and V-Y closure versus simple closing sutures on nasolabial changes after Le Fort I intrusion and advancement osteotomies. Muradin MS; Seubring K; Stoelinga PJ; vd Bilt A; Koole R; Rosenberg AJ J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 69(3):870-6. PubMed ID: 20727648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term stability of limiting nasal alar base width changes with a cinch suture following Le Fort I osteotomy with submental intubation. Raithatha R; Naini FB; Patel S; Sherriff M; Witherow H Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 46(11):1372-1379. PubMed ID: 28669485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tip upturning and maxillary advancement: the UT angle. Tartaro G; Santagata M; Corzo L; Rauso R J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Sep; 19(5):1387-90. PubMed ID: 18812869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is the Pyriform Ligament Important for Alar Width Maintenance After Le Fort I Osteotomy? Peacock ZS; Susarla SM J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 73(12 Suppl):S57-66. PubMed ID: 26608155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative analysis of two different alar base sutures after Le Fort I osteotomy: randomized double-blind controlled trial. Ritto FG; Medeiros PJ; de Moraes M; Ribeiro DP Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Feb; 111(2):181-9. PubMed ID: 20656527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of two alar base suture techniques suture techniques on nasolabial changes after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery in Taiwanese patients with class III malocclusions. Chen CY; Lin CC; Ko EW Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 44(7):816-22. PubMed ID: 25825373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between the classical and a modified trans-septal technique of alar cinching for Le Fort I osteotomies: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Nirvikalpa N; Narayanan V; Wahab A; Ramadorai A Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 42(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 22771085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Effect of alar base cinch suture based on anatomic landmarks on the morphology of nasolabial region in patients after orthognathic surgery]. Zhang W; Liu XJ; Li ZL; Zhang Y Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2023 Aug; 55(4):736-742. PubMed ID: 37534660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modified alar base cinch suture fixation at the bilateral lower border of the piriform rim after a maxillary Le Fort I osteotomy. Yen CY; Kuo CL; Liu IH; Su WC; Jiang HR; Huang IG; Liu SY; Lee SY Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Nov; 45(11):1459-1463. PubMed ID: 27364371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative use of photography in orthognathic outcome assessment. Edler RJ; Wertheim D; Greenhill D; Jaisinghani A Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 49(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 19804924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of soft tissue morphologic changes after using the alar base cinch suture in Le Fort I osteotomy in mandibular prognathism with and without asymmetry. Moroi A; Ishihara Y; Sotobori M; Nakazawa R; Higuchi M; Nakano Y; Marukawa K; Ueki K J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):718-24. PubMed ID: 24424271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Subnasal modified Le Fort I osteotomy: indications and results. Fernández Sanromán J; Costas López A; Fernández Ferro M; Arenaz Bua J; López de Sánchez A J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 42(4):347-50. PubMed ID: 24525028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of three surgical techniques for controlling nasal width after Le Fort I osteotomy]. Wang ZQ; Wang XX; Li ZL; Yi B; Liang C; Wang X Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Feb; 47(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 25686338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]