These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19740624)

  • 1. Variation in results from randomized, controlled trials: stochastic or systematic?
    Jane-wit D; Horwitz RI; Concato J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Jan; 63(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 19740624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using routine data to complement and enhance the results of randomised controlled trials.
    Lewsey JD; Leyland AH; Murray GD; Boddy FA
    Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(22):1-55. PubMed ID: 11074392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methodological quality and homogeneity influenced agreement between randomized trials and nonrandomized studies of the same intervention for back pain.
    Furlan AD; Tomlinson G; Jadad AA; Bombardier C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 61(3):209-31. PubMed ID: 18226744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short- versus long-course antibiotic therapy for acute pyelonephritis in adolescents and adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Kyriakidou KG; Rafailidis P; Matthaiou DK; Athanasiou S; Falagas ME
    Clin Ther; 2008 Oct; 30(10):1859-68. PubMed ID: 19014841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A structured review of randomized controlled trials of weight loss showed little improvement in health-related quality of life.
    Maciejewski ML; Patrick DL; Williamson DF
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Jun; 58(6):568-78. PubMed ID: 15878470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analysis of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in medically Ill patients.
    Kanaan AO; Silva MA; Donovan JL; Roy T; Al-Homsi AS
    Clin Ther; 2007 Nov; 29(11):2395-405. PubMed ID: 18158080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials.
    LeLorier J; Grégoire G; Benhaddad A; Lapierre J; Derderian F
    N Engl J Med; 1997 Aug; 337(8):536-42. PubMed ID: 9262498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the benefit of event adjudication of cardiovascular outcomes in large simple RCTs.
    Pogue J; Walter SD; Yusuf S
    Clin Trials; 2009 Jun; 6(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 19528133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomized clinical trials: the meeting place of medical practice and clinical research.
    Hughes EG
    Semin Reprod Med; 2003 Feb; 21(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 12806560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new scale for assessing the quality of randomized clinical trials of psychotherapy.
    Kocsis JH; Gerber AJ; Milrod B; Roose SP; Barber J; Thase ME; Perkins P; Leon AC
    Compr Psychiatry; 2010; 51(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 20399343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meta-analysis of well-designed nonrandomized comparative studies of surgical procedures is as good as randomized controlled trials.
    Abraham NS; Byrne CJ; Young JM; Solomon MJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 19716267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Empirical assessment suggests that existing evidence could be used more fully in designing randomized controlled trials.
    Goudie AC; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Donald A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Sep; 63(9):983-91. PubMed ID: 20573483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How to read a report of a randomized controlled trial.
    Jun M; Zoungas S; Perkovic V; Webster AC
    Nephrology (Carlton); 2010 Mar; 15(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 20470272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Appropriately selecting and concisely reporting the outcome measures of randomized controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine.
    Bian ZX; Moher D; Li YP; Wu TX; Dagenais S; Cheng CW; Li J; Li TQ
    Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2008 Aug; 6(8):771-5. PubMed ID: 18664342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How helpful are meta-analyses in determining the best therapy of blood diseases?
    Gale RP; Lazarus HM
    Acta Haematol; 2011; 125(1-2):91-101. PubMed ID: 21150191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When wait lists are not feasible, nothing is a thing that does not need to be done.
    Devilly GJ; McFarlane AC
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2009 Dec; 77(6):1159-68. PubMed ID: 19968391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence-based urology: how does a randomized clinical trial achieve its designed goals?
    Sadeghi Bazargani H; Hajebrahimi S
    Urol J; 2011; 8(2):88-96. PubMed ID: 21656466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reporting of treatment effects from randomized trials: a plea for multivariable risk ratios.
    Groenwold RH; Moons KG; Peelen LM; Knol MJ; Hoes AW
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 May; 32(3):399-402. PubMed ID: 21195797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in interaction and subgroup-specific effects were observed between randomized and nonrandomized studies in three empirical examples.
    Schmidt AF; Rovers MM; Klungel OH; Hoes AW; Knol MJ; Nielen M; de Boer A; Groenwold RH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jun; 66(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 23510555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.