144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19740624)
1. Variation in results from randomized, controlled trials: stochastic or systematic?
Jane-wit D; Horwitz RI; Concato J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Jan; 63(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 19740624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using routine data to complement and enhance the results of randomised controlled trials.
Lewsey JD; Leyland AH; Murray GD; Boddy FA
Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(22):1-55. PubMed ID: 11074392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Methodological quality and homogeneity influenced agreement between randomized trials and nonrandomized studies of the same intervention for back pain.
Furlan AD; Tomlinson G; Jadad AA; Bombardier C
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 61(3):209-31. PubMed ID: 18226744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short- versus long-course antibiotic therapy for acute pyelonephritis in adolescents and adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Kyriakidou KG; Rafailidis P; Matthaiou DK; Athanasiou S; Falagas ME
Clin Ther; 2008 Oct; 30(10):1859-68. PubMed ID: 19014841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A structured review of randomized controlled trials of weight loss showed little improvement in health-related quality of life.
Maciejewski ML; Patrick DL; Williamson DF
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Jun; 58(6):568-78. PubMed ID: 15878470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Meta-analysis of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in medically Ill patients.
Kanaan AO; Silva MA; Donovan JL; Roy T; Al-Homsi AS
Clin Ther; 2007 Nov; 29(11):2395-405. PubMed ID: 18158080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials.
LeLorier J; Grégoire G; Benhaddad A; Lapierre J; Derderian F
N Engl J Med; 1997 Aug; 337(8):536-42. PubMed ID: 9262498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating the benefit of event adjudication of cardiovascular outcomes in large simple RCTs.
Pogue J; Walter SD; Yusuf S
Clin Trials; 2009 Jun; 6(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 19528133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized clinical trials: the meeting place of medical practice and clinical research.
Hughes EG
Semin Reprod Med; 2003 Feb; 21(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 12806560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new scale for assessing the quality of randomized clinical trials of psychotherapy.
Kocsis JH; Gerber AJ; Milrod B; Roose SP; Barber J; Thase ME; Perkins P; Leon AC
Compr Psychiatry; 2010; 51(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 20399343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Meta-analysis of well-designed nonrandomized comparative studies of surgical procedures is as good as randomized controlled trials.
Abraham NS; Byrne CJ; Young JM; Solomon MJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 19716267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Empirical assessment suggests that existing evidence could be used more fully in designing randomized controlled trials.
Goudie AC; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Donald A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Sep; 63(9):983-91. PubMed ID: 20573483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How to read a report of a randomized controlled trial.
Jun M; Zoungas S; Perkovic V; Webster AC
Nephrology (Carlton); 2010 Mar; 15(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 20470272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Appropriately selecting and concisely reporting the outcome measures of randomized controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine.
Bian ZX; Moher D; Li YP; Wu TX; Dagenais S; Cheng CW; Li J; Li TQ
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2008 Aug; 6(8):771-5. PubMed ID: 18664342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How helpful are meta-analyses in determining the best therapy of blood diseases?
Gale RP; Lazarus HM
Acta Haematol; 2011; 125(1-2):91-101. PubMed ID: 21150191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. When wait lists are not feasible, nothing is a thing that does not need to be done.
Devilly GJ; McFarlane AC
J Consult Clin Psychol; 2009 Dec; 77(6):1159-68. PubMed ID: 19968391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evidence-based urology: how does a randomized clinical trial achieve its designed goals?
Sadeghi Bazargani H; Hajebrahimi S
Urol J; 2011; 8(2):88-96. PubMed ID: 21656466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reporting of treatment effects from randomized trials: a plea for multivariable risk ratios.
Groenwold RH; Moons KG; Peelen LM; Knol MJ; Hoes AW
Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 May; 32(3):399-402. PubMed ID: 21195797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differences in interaction and subgroup-specific effects were observed between randomized and nonrandomized studies in three empirical examples.
Schmidt AF; Rovers MM; Klungel OH; Hoes AW; Knol MJ; Nielen M; de Boer A; Groenwold RH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jun; 66(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 23510555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
