These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Comparison of Etest, agar dilution, broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods for testing in vitro activity of levofloxacin against Staphylococcus spp. isolated from neutropenic cancer patients. Di Bonaventura G; D'Antonio D; Catamo G; Ballone E; Piccolomini R Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2002 Feb; 19(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 11850168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of the E test for determining antimicrobial susceptibilities of staphylococci, enterococci, Campylobacter jejuni, and gram-negative bacteria resistant to antimicrobial agents. Huang MB; Baker CN; Banerjee S; Tenover FC J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Dec; 30(12):3243-8. PubMed ID: 1452709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aerococcus urinae and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Humphries RM; Lee C; Hindler JA J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Nov; 49(11):3934-5. PubMed ID: 21918023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rapidly growing mycobacteria: testing of susceptibility to 34 antimicrobial agents by broth microdilution. Swenson JM; Thornsberry C; Silcox VA Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1982 Aug; 22(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 6927280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro susceptibility of bovine mastitis pathogens to a combination of penicillin and framycetin: development of interpretive criteria for testing by broth microdilution and disk diffusion. Pillar CM; Stoneburner A; Shinabarger DL; Abbeloos E; Goby L; Bradley AJ J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6594-607. PubMed ID: 25129497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Discrepancies between results obtained by agar and broth techniques in testing of drug combinations. Kurien S; Lorian V J Clin Microbiol; 1980 May; 11(5):527-9. PubMed ID: 7381021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Clostridium difficile minimum inhibitory concentrations obtained using agar dilution vs broth microdilution methods. Hastey CJ; Dale SE; Nary J; Citron D; Law JH; Roe-Carpenter DE; Chesnel L Anaerobe; 2017 Apr; 44():73-77. PubMed ID: 28188880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interpretive criteria and quality control parameters for testing of susceptibilities of Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae to trimethoprim and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. The Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing OC Group. Fuchs PC; Barry AL; Brown SD J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Jan; 35(1):125-31. PubMed ID: 8968893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of broth macrodilution, broth microdilution, and E test antifungal susceptibility tests for fluconazole. Sewell DL; Pfaller MA; Barry AL J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Sep; 32(9):2099-102. PubMed ID: 7814531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of three media for agar dilution susceptibility testing of Bordetella pertussis using six antibiotics. Hoppe JE; Paulus T Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1998 Jun; 17(6):391-3. PubMed ID: 9758277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of six antimicrobial susceptibility methods for testing linezolid against staphylococci and enterococci. Tenover FC; Williams PP; Stocker S; Thompson A; Clark LA; Limbago B; Carey RB; Poppe SM; Shinabarger D; McGowan JE J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 45(9):2917-22. PubMed ID: 17634301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]