223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19741082)
21. Ribotyping of Clostridium difficile strains associated with nosocomial transmission and relapses in a Swedish County.
Magnusson C; Wullt M; Löfgren S; Iveroth P; Akerlund T; Matussek A
APMIS; 2013 Feb; 121(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 23030627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Modifications of commercial toxigenic Clostridium difficile PCR resulting in improved economy and workflow efficiency.
Munson E; Bilbo D; Paul M; Napierala M; Hryciuk JE
J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Jun; 49(6):2279-82. PubMed ID: 21450967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of a new automated homogeneous PCR assay, GenomEra C. difficile, for rapid detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in fecal specimens.
Hirvonen JJ; Mentula S; Kaukoranta SS
J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Sep; 51(9):2908-12. PubMed ID: 23804386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of PCR ribotyping and multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA) for improved detection of Clostridium difficile.
Wei HL; Kao CW; Wei SH; Tzen JT; Chiou CS
BMC Microbiol; 2011 Sep; 11():217. PubMed ID: 21961456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Clostridium difficile isolates resistant to fluoroquinolones in Italy: emergence of PCR ribotype 018.
Spigaglia P; Barbanti F; Dionisi AM; Mastrantonio P
J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Aug; 48(8):2892-6. PubMed ID: 20554809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of a rapid molecular method, the BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay, to the most frequently used laboratory tests for detection of toxin-producing Clostridium difficile in diarrheal feces.
Terhes G; Urbán E; Sóki J; Nacsa E; Nagy E
J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Nov; 47(11):3478-81. PubMed ID: 19794052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Rapid detection of the Clostridium difficile ribotype 027 tcdC gene frame shift mutation at position 117 by real-time PCR and melt curve analysis.
Wolff D; Brüning T; Gerritzen A
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2009 Aug; 28(8):959-62. PubMed ID: 19333630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prevalence and genetic characterization of toxin A variant strains of Clostridium difficile among adults and children with diarrhea in France.
Barbut F; Lalande V; Burghoffer B; Thien HV; Grimprel E; Petit JC
J Clin Microbiol; 2002 Jun; 40(6):2079-83. PubMed ID: 12037068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of the Xpert Clostridium difficile assay for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.
Shin S; Kim M; Kim M; Lim H; Kim H; Lee K; Chong Y
Ann Lab Med; 2012 Sep; 32(5):355-8. PubMed ID: 22950071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of commercial molecular assays for toxigenic Clostridium difficile detection in stools: BD GeneOhm Cdiff, XPert C. difficile and illumigene C. difficile.
Viala C; Le Monnier A; Maataoui N; Rousseau C; Collignon A; Poilane I
J Microbiol Methods; 2012 Aug; 90(2):83-5. PubMed ID: 22565213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Optimizing laboratory workflow for the diagnosis of Clostridiodes difficile infection in a medical center in Northern Taiwan.
Chang FC; Liu CP; Sun FJ; Lin CC
J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2021 Apr; 54(2):284-289. PubMed ID: 31624018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of real-time PCR for detection of the tcdC gene with four toxin immunoassays and culture in diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.
Sloan LM; Duresko BJ; Gustafson DR; Rosenblatt JE
J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Jun; 46(6):1996-2001. PubMed ID: 18434563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Performance assessment of the BD MAX Cdiff assay in comparison to Xpert C. difficile assay in a setting with very low prevalence of toxigenic Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 027.
Chiang D; Ng S; La MV; Jureen R; Lin RT; Teo JW
Anaerobe; 2014 Dec; 30():156-8. PubMed ID: 25305151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Presumptive identification of Clostridium difficile strain 027/NAP1/BI on Cepheid Xpert: interpret with caution.
Kok J; Wang Q; Thomas LC; Gilbert GL
J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Oct; 49(10):3719-21. PubMed ID: 21849697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 078: an emerging strain in humans and in pigs?
Goorhuis A; Debast SB; van Leengoed LA; Harmanus C; Notermans DW; Bergwerff AA; Kuijper EJ
J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Mar; 46(3):1157; author reply 1158. PubMed ID: 18326836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of repetitive element sequence-based PCR as a molecular typing method for Clostridium difficile.
Spigaglia P; Mastrantonio P
J Clin Microbiol; 2003 Jun; 41(6):2454-7. PubMed ID: 12791864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Characterization of toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive Clostridium difficile isolates from outbreaks in different countries by amplified fragment length polymorphism and PCR ribotyping.
van den Berg RJ; Claas EC; Oyib DH; Klaassen CH; Dijkshoorn L; Brazier JS; Kuijper EJ
J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Mar; 42(3):1035-41. PubMed ID: 15004050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Surface layer protein A variant of Clostridium difficile PCR-ribotype 027.
Spigaglia P; Barbanti F; Mastrantonio P
Emerg Infect Dis; 2011 Feb; 17(2):317-9. PubMed ID: 21291621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert C. difficile/Epi and meridian bioscience illumigene C. difficile assays for detecting Clostridium difficile ribotype 033 strains.
Androga GO; McGovern AM; Elliott B; Chang BJ; Perkins TT; Foster NF; Riley TV
J Clin Microbiol; 2015 Mar; 53(3):973-5. PubMed ID: 25520452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Rapid molecular characterization of Clostridium difficile and assessment of populations of C. difficile in stool specimens.
Wroblewski D; Hannett GE; Bopp DJ; Dumyati GK; Halse TA; Dumas NB; Musser KA
J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Jul; 47(7):2142-8. PubMed ID: 19403775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
