121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19742143)
1. Diabetes and PET Scans: Only Part of a Bigger Problem.
Khithani A
Gastrointest Cancer Res; 2009 Jul; 3(4):165-6. PubMed ID: 19742143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementation and validation of an adaptive template registration method for 18F-flutemetamol imaging data.
Lundqvist R; Lilja J; Thomas BA; Lötjönen J; Villemagne VL; Rowe CC; Thurfjell L
J Nucl Med; 2013 Aug; 54(8):1472-8. PubMed ID: 23740104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of the Noise Penalty Factor on Quantification in Bayesian Penalized Likelihood (Q.Clear) Reconstructions of
Rijnsdorp S; Roef MJ; Arends AJ
Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 May; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 34066854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of 18FDG-PET with CT scans in the evaluation of patients with residual and recurrent Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Dittmann H; Sokler M; Kollmannsberger C; Dohmen BM; Baumann C; Kopp A; Bares R; Claussen CD; Kanz L; Bokemeyer C
Oncol Rep; 2001; 8(6):1393-9. PubMed ID: 11605073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of positron emission tomography for the detection of melanoma metastases.
Holder WD; White RL; Zuger JH; Easton EJ; Greene FL
Ann Surg; 1998 May; 227(5):764-9; discussion 769-71. PubMed ID: 9605668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Frequency of high blood glucose prior to FDG PET.
Khandani AH; Bravo IM; Patel PS; Ivanovic M; Kirk D
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 May; 42(5):1583-1585. PubMed ID: 27999884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A novel supervised learning method to generate CT images for attenuation correction in delayed pet scans.
Rao F; Yang B; Chen YW; Li J; Wang H; Ye H; Wang Y; Zhao K; Zhu W
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Dec; 197():105764. PubMed ID: 33010702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prone mammoPET acquisition improves the ability to fuse MRI and PET breast scans.
Moy L; Noz ME; Maguire GQ; Ponzo F; Deans AE; Murphy-Walcott AD; Kramer EL
Clin Nucl Med; 2007 Mar; 32(3):194-8. PubMed ID: 17314593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of Diabetes on the Interpretation of PET Scans in Patients With Esophageal Cancer.
Haley M; Konski A; Li T; Cheng JD; Maurer A; Haluszka O; Scott W; Meropol NJ; Cohen SJ; Freedman G
Gastrointest Cancer Res; 2009 Jul; 3(4):149-52. PubMed ID: 19742140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Utility of positron emission tomography scans in mantle cell lymphoma.
Hosein PJ; Pastorini VH; Paes FM; Eber D; Chapman JR; Serafini AN; Alizadeh AA; Lossos IS
Am J Hematol; 2011 Oct; 86(10):841-5. PubMed ID: 21922524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Qualitative interpretation of PET scans using a Likert scale to assess neck node response to radiotherapy in head and neck cancer.
Sjövall J; Bitzén U; Kjellén E; Nilsson P; Wahlberg P; Brun E
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Apr; 43(4):609-16. PubMed ID: 26428529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Value of fourth and subsequent post-therapy follow-up 18F-FDG PET/CT scans in patients with breast cancer.
Taghipour M; Sheikhbahaei S; Trahan TJ; Subramaniam RM
Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Jun; 37(6):602-8. PubMed ID: 27110955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 18F-FDG PET/CT and lung cancer: value of fourth and subsequent posttherapy follow-up scans for patient management.
Marcus C; Paidpally V; Antoniou A; Zaheer A; Wahl RL; Subramaniam RM
J Nucl Med; 2015 Feb; 56(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 25613535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. PET-CT scans in recurrent or persistent differentiated thyroid cancer: is there added utility beyond conventional imaging?
Lal G; Fairchild T; Howe JR; Weigel RJ; Sugg SL; Menda Y
Surgery; 2010 Dec; 148(6):1082-9; discussion 1089-90. PubMed ID: 21134537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of the normalization template on the outcome of statistical parametric mapping of PET scans.
Gispert JD; Pascau J; Reig S; Martínez-Lázaro R; Molina V; García-Barreno P; Desco M
Neuroimage; 2003 Jul; 19(3):601-12. PubMed ID: 12880791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gradient-based generation of intermediate images for heterogeneous tumor segmentation within hybrid PET/MRI scans.
Sbei A; ElBedoui K; Barhoumi W; Maktouf C
Comput Biol Med; 2020 Apr; 119():103669. PubMed ID: 32339115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of FDG-PET and Bone Scans for Detecting Skeletal Metastases in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
Durski JM; Srinivas S; Segall G
Clin Positron Imaging; 2000 May; 3(3):97-105. PubMed ID: 11008099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Untreated lung cancer: quantification of systematic distortion of tumor size and shape on non-attenuation-corrected 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET scans.
Zasadny KR; Kison PV; Quint LE; Wahl RL
Radiology; 1996 Dec; 201(3):873-6. PubMed ID: 8939245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in Merkel cell carcinoma: a study of 270 scans in 97 patients at the Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center.
Hawryluk EB; O'Regan KN; Sheehy N; Guo Y; Dorosario A; Sakellis CG; Jacene HA; Wang LC
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2013 Apr; 68(4):592-599. PubMed ID: 23127473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of FDG-PET in the evaluation and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma with comparison of tumor size, AFP level, and histologic grade.
Wolfort RM; Papillion PW; Turnage RH; Lillien DL; Ramaswamy MR; Zibari GB
Int Surg; 2010; 95(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 20480845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
