BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19742385)

  • 1. The influence of visual contrast and case changes on parafoveal preview benefits during reading.
    Wang CA; Inhoff AW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Apr; 63(4):805-17. PubMed ID: 19742385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Parafoveal preview benefit in reading is only obtained from the saccade goal.
    McDonald SA
    Vision Res; 2006 Dec; 46(26):4416-24. PubMed ID: 17045323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preview benefit during eye fixations in reading for older and younger readers.
    Rayner K; Castelhano MS; Yang J
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Sep; 25(3):714-8. PubMed ID: 20853974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distinct subsystems for the parafoveal processing of spatial and linguistic information during eye fixations in reading.
    Inhoff AW; Radach R; Eiter BM; Juhasz B
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Jul; 56(5):803-27. PubMed ID: 12850988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is attention confined to one word at a time? The spatial distribution of parafoveal preview benefits during reading.
    Wang CA; Inhoff AW; Radach R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1487-94. PubMed ID: 19801609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preview benefit and parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n + 2.
    Kliegl R; Risse S; Laubrock J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1250-5. PubMed ID: 17924820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parafoveal processing of word n + 2 during reading: do the preceding words matter?
    Angele B; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1210-20. PubMed ID: 21553996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence for delayed parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n+2 in reading.
    Risse S; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Aug; 38(4):1026-42. PubMed ID: 22428669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2? Evidence from eye movements.
    Yang J; Wang S; Xu Y; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):1192-204. PubMed ID: 19653758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissociating preview validity and preview difficulty in parafoveal processing of word n + 1 during reading.
    Risse S; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):653-68. PubMed ID: 24294870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Word processing in the parafoveal region.
    Lee CH; Kim K
    Int J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 44(5):369-77. PubMed ID: 22029615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading.
    Plummer P; Rayner K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):950-63. PubMed ID: 22391893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.
    Rayner K; Juhasz BJ; Brown SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):230-45. PubMed ID: 17311490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trans-saccadic parafoveal preview benefits in fluent reading: a study with fixation-related brain potentials.
    Dimigen O; Kliegl R; Sommer W
    Neuroimage; 2012 Aug; 62(1):381-93. PubMed ID: 22521255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Eye movement control during reading: foveal load and parafoveal processing.
    Schroyens W; Vitu F; Brysbaert M; d'Ydewalle G
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1999 Nov; 52(4):1021-46. PubMed ID: 10605397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parafoveal magnification: visual acuity does not modulate the perceptual span in reading.
    Miellet S; O'Donnell PJ; Sereno SC
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Jun; 20(6):721-8. PubMed ID: 19470124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contextual constraint and Nā€‰+ā€‰2 preview effects in reading.
    Radach R; Inhoff AW; Glover L; Vorstius C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):619-33. PubMed ID: 23394582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Semantic preview benefit in eye movements during reading: A parafoveal fast-priming study.
    Hohenstein S; Laubrock J; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1150-70. PubMed ID: 20804291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How preview space/time translates into preview cost/benefit for fixation durations during reading.
    Kliegl R; Hohenstein S; Yan M; McDonald SA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):581-600. PubMed ID: 22515948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.