These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19744052)

  • 21. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines can improve wound care.
    Weller C; McNeil J
    J Wound Care; 2010 Aug; 19(8):347-53. PubMed ID: 20852507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The availability of original data and statistics: an improvement in good publication practice.
    Morselli-Labate AM
    JOP; 2003 Nov; 4(6):193-9. PubMed ID: 14614199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Some controversies in planning and analysing multi-centre trials.
    Senn S
    Stat Med; 1998 Aug 15-30; 17(15-16):1753-65; discussion 1799-800. PubMed ID: 9749445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Quantifying the strength of the scientific evidence].
    Catelan D; Biggeri A; Barbone F
    Epidemiol Prev; 2011; 35(5-6):358-61. PubMed ID: 22166784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Overcoming the fear of statistics: survival skills for researchers.
    Williams KB
    J Dent Hyg; 2012; 86(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 22309926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sample size calculations: should the emperor's clothes be off the peg or made to measure?
    Norman G; Monteiro S; Salama S
    BMJ; 2012 Aug; 345():e5278. PubMed ID: 22918496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Guidelines for reporting of statistics in European Urology.
    Vickers AJ; Sjoberg DD;
    Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 25037638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: Alternative tool structure is proposed.
    Crowe M; Sheppard L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Jan; 64(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 21130354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research.
    Kilkenny C; Browne WJ; Cuthill IC; Emerson M; Altman DG
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2012 Apr; 20(4):256-60. PubMed ID: 22424462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research.
    Kilkenny C; Browne WJ; Cuthi I; Emerson M; Altman DG
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2012 Mar; 41(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 22390425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Simplifying the process of research review for the novice researcher.
    Callihan D
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 18199936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quality Appraisal: Part I.
    Raines DA
    Neonatal Netw; 2015; 34(4):245-7. PubMed ID: 26802640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Five is the maximum sample size for case reports: statistical justification, epidemiologic rationale, and clinical importance.
    Esene IN; Kotb A; ElHusseiny H
    World Neurosurg; 2014 Nov; 82(5):e659-65. PubMed ID: 24831106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Power, reliability, and heterogeneous results.
    Shrier I
    PLoS Med; 2005 Nov; 2(11):e386; author reply e398. PubMed ID: 16288559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect size, statistical power, and sample size for assessing interactions between categorical and continuous variables.
    Shieh G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Feb; 72(1):136-154. PubMed ID: 30468259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Thinking both inside and outside the box on measurement articles.
    Froman RD; Schmitt MH
    Res Nurs Health; 2003 Oct; 26(5):335-6. PubMed ID: 14579254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Survey of editors and reviewers of high-impact psychology journals: statistical and research design problems in submitted manuscripts.
    Harris A; Reeder R; Hyun J
    J Psychol; 2011; 145(3):195-209. PubMed ID: 21560804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Understanding statistical significance.
    Hayat MJ
    Nurs Res; 2010; 59(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 20445438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reports of reports: how good are secondary publications in medicine?
    Davidoff F
    CMAJ; 2001 May; 164(11):1580-1. PubMed ID: 11402798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Power dressing and meta-analysis: incorporating power analysis into meta-analysis.
    Muncer S; Taylor S; Craigie M
    J Adv Nurs; 2002 May; 38(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 11972663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.