These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19744120)
1. Species hybrids in the laboratory but not in nature: a reanalysis of premating isolation between Drosophila arizonae and D. mojavensis. Jennings JH; Etges WJ Evolution; 2010 Feb; 64(2):587-98. PubMed ID: 19744120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sympatry, allopatry and sexual isolation between Drosophila mojavensis and D. arizonae. Massie KR; Markow TA Hereditas; 2005 Feb; 142(2005):51-5. PubMed ID: 16970612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of experimental design on Drosophila sexual isolation studies: direct effects and comparison to field hybridization data. Coyne JA; Elwyn S; Rolán-Alvarez E Evolution; 2005 Dec; 59(12):2588-601. PubMed ID: 16526506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis. I. Male courtship song, mating success, and genotype x environment interactions. Etges WJ; de Oliveira CC; Gragg E; Ortíz-Barrientos D; Noor MA; Ritchie MG Evolution; 2007 May; 61(5):1106-19. PubMed ID: 17492965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproductive isolation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster from Brazzaville (Congo). Haerty W; Jallon JM; Rouault J; Bazin C; Capy P Genetica; 2002 Nov; 116(2-3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12555780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Postmating-prezygotic isolation is not an important source of selection for reinforcement within and between species in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Lorch PD; Servedio MR Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1039-45. PubMed ID: 16136803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evidence of reinforcement of premating isolation between two species of the genus Ochthebius (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae). Urbanelli S; Porretta D Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1520-7. PubMed ID: 18363862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sexual isolation between sympatric and allopatric populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Anderson WW; Kim YK Behav Genet; 2005 May; 35(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 15864445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. IV. Correlated responses in behavioral isolation to artificial selection on a life-history trait. Etges WJ Am Nat; 1998 Jul; 152(1):129-44. PubMed ID: 18811406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simulating natural conditions in the laboratory: a re-examination of sexual isolation between sympatric and allopatric populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Noor MA; Ortíz-Barrientos D Behav Genet; 2006 Mar; 36(2):322-7. PubMed ID: 16502138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. VIII. Mating success mediated by epicuticular hydrocarbons within and between isolated populations. Etges WJ; Tripodi AD J Evol Biol; 2008 Nov; 21(6):1641-52. PubMed ID: 18713239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multilocus test for introgression between the cactophilic species Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonae. Counterman BA; Noor MA Am Nat; 2006 Nov; 168(5):682-96. PubMed ID: 17080365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. IX. Host plant and population specific epicuticular hydrocarbon expression influences mate choice and sexual selection. Havens JA; Etges WJ J Evol Biol; 2013 Mar; 26(3):562-76. PubMed ID: 23286346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis. III. Life-history divergence in allopatry and reproductive isolation. Etges WJ; De Oliveira CC; Noor MA; Ritchie MG Evolution; 2010 Dec; 64(12):3549-69. PubMed ID: 20681983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sexual conflict does not drive reproductive isolation in experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Bacigalupe LD; Crudgington HS; Hunter F; Moore AJ; Snook RR J Evol Biol; 2007 Sep; 20(5):1763-71. PubMed ID: 17714294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of thermal stress on the mating behavior of three Drosophila species. Patton ZJ; Krebs RA Physiol Biochem Zool; 2001; 74(6):783-8. PubMed ID: 11731970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phenotypic divergence but not genetic distance predicts assortative mating among species of a cichlid fish radiation. Stelkens RB; Seehausen O J Evol Biol; 2009 Aug; 22(8):1679-94. PubMed ID: 19549141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Variable assortative mating in replicate mating trials using Drosophila melanogaster populations derived from contrasting opposing slopes of 'Evolution Canyon', Israel. Drake A; Rashkovetsky E; Wong D; Rundle HD; Mooers AØ J Evol Biol; 2005 Jul; 18(4):1123-9. PubMed ID: 16033586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sexual isolation and mating propensity among allopatric Drosophila mettleri populations. Castrezana SJ; Markow TA Behav Genet; 2008 Jul; 38(4):437-45. PubMed ID: 18561017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Existence of a pattern of reproductive character displacement in Homobasidiomycota but not in Ascomycota. Le Gac M; Giraud T J Evol Biol; 2008 May; 21(3):761-72. PubMed ID: 18312316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]