280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19744120)
1. Species hybrids in the laboratory but not in nature: a reanalysis of premating isolation between Drosophila arizonae and D. mojavensis.
Jennings JH; Etges WJ
Evolution; 2010 Feb; 64(2):587-98. PubMed ID: 19744120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sympatry, allopatry and sexual isolation between Drosophila mojavensis and D. arizonae.
Massie KR; Markow TA
Hereditas; 2005 Feb; 142(2005):51-5. PubMed ID: 16970612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of experimental design on Drosophila sexual isolation studies: direct effects and comparison to field hybridization data.
Coyne JA; Elwyn S; Rolán-Alvarez E
Evolution; 2005 Dec; 59(12):2588-601. PubMed ID: 16526506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis. I. Male courtship song, mating success, and genotype x environment interactions.
Etges WJ; de Oliveira CC; Gragg E; Ortíz-Barrientos D; Noor MA; Ritchie MG
Evolution; 2007 May; 61(5):1106-19. PubMed ID: 17492965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproductive isolation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster from Brazzaville (Congo).
Haerty W; Jallon JM; Rouault J; Bazin C; Capy P
Genetica; 2002 Nov; 116(2-3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12555780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Postmating-prezygotic isolation is not an important source of selection for reinforcement within and between species in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
Lorch PD; Servedio MR
Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1039-45. PubMed ID: 16136803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evidence of reinforcement of premating isolation between two species of the genus Ochthebius (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae).
Urbanelli S; Porretta D
Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1520-7. PubMed ID: 18363862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sexual isolation between sympatric and allopatric populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
Anderson WW; Kim YK
Behav Genet; 2005 May; 35(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 15864445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. IV. Correlated responses in behavioral isolation to artificial selection on a life-history trait.
Etges WJ
Am Nat; 1998 Jul; 152(1):129-44. PubMed ID: 18811406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simulating natural conditions in the laboratory: a re-examination of sexual isolation between sympatric and allopatric populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
Noor MA; Ortíz-Barrientos D
Behav Genet; 2006 Mar; 36(2):322-7. PubMed ID: 16502138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. VIII. Mating success mediated by epicuticular hydrocarbons within and between isolated populations.
Etges WJ; Tripodi AD
J Evol Biol; 2008 Nov; 21(6):1641-52. PubMed ID: 18713239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multilocus test for introgression between the cactophilic species Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonae.
Counterman BA; Noor MA
Am Nat; 2006 Nov; 168(5):682-96. PubMed ID: 17080365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. IX. Host plant and population specific epicuticular hydrocarbon expression influences mate choice and sexual selection.
Havens JA; Etges WJ
J Evol Biol; 2013 Mar; 26(3):562-76. PubMed ID: 23286346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis. III. Life-history divergence in allopatry and reproductive isolation.
Etges WJ; De Oliveira CC; Noor MA; Ritchie MG
Evolution; 2010 Dec; 64(12):3549-69. PubMed ID: 20681983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sexual conflict does not drive reproductive isolation in experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.
Bacigalupe LD; Crudgington HS; Hunter F; Moore AJ; Snook RR
J Evol Biol; 2007 Sep; 20(5):1763-71. PubMed ID: 17714294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of thermal stress on the mating behavior of three Drosophila species.
Patton ZJ; Krebs RA
Physiol Biochem Zool; 2001; 74(6):783-8. PubMed ID: 11731970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phenotypic divergence but not genetic distance predicts assortative mating among species of a cichlid fish radiation.
Stelkens RB; Seehausen O
J Evol Biol; 2009 Aug; 22(8):1679-94. PubMed ID: 19549141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Variable assortative mating in replicate mating trials using Drosophila melanogaster populations derived from contrasting opposing slopes of 'Evolution Canyon', Israel.
Drake A; Rashkovetsky E; Wong D; Rundle HD; Mooers AØ
J Evol Biol; 2005 Jul; 18(4):1123-9. PubMed ID: 16033586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sexual isolation and mating propensity among allopatric Drosophila mettleri populations.
Castrezana SJ; Markow TA
Behav Genet; 2008 Jul; 38(4):437-45. PubMed ID: 18561017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Existence of a pattern of reproductive character displacement in Homobasidiomycota but not in Ascomycota.
Le Gac M; Giraud T
J Evol Biol; 2008 May; 21(3):761-72. PubMed ID: 18312316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
