697 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19744197)
1. The effects of superficial roughness and design on the primary stability of dental implants.
Dos Santos MV; Elias CN; Cavalcanti Lima JH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Sep; 13(3):215-23. PubMed ID: 19744197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study.
Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 20070754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis of dental implant systems in an animal model with loaded implants.
Al-Nawas B; Wagner W; Grötz KA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):726-32. PubMed ID: 17066633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of the surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with a density equivalent to maxillary bone: a laboratory study.
Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 19298286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical stability of immediately loaded implants with various surfaces and designs: a pilot study in dogs.
Neugebauer J; Weinländer M; Lekovic V; von Berg KH; Zoeller JE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1083-92. PubMed ID: 20162113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite, Osseotite, SLA and TiOblast implants.
Sul YT; Jönsson J; Yoon GS; Johansson C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1146-55. PubMed ID: 19719742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits.
Fernandes Ede L; Unikowski IL; Teixeira ER; da Costa NP; Shinkai RS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 18271369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical outcome of 802 immediately loaded 2-stage submerged implants with a new grit-blasted and acid-etched surface: 12-month follow-up.
Degidi M; Piattelli A; Gehrke P; Carinci F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):763-8. PubMed ID: 17066638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relevance of resonance frequency analysis to evaluate dental implant stability: simulation and histomorphometrical animal experiments.
Ito Y; Sato D; Yoneda S; Ito D; Kondo H; Kasugai S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 17986265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of defect depth on resonance frequency analysis and insertion torque values for implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: a human cadaver study.
Turkyilmaz I; Sennerby L; Yilmaz B; Bilecenoglu B; Ozbek EN
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Mar; 11(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18384400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determination of primary stability: a comparison of the surgeon's perception and objective measurements.
Degidi M; Daprile G; Piattelli A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):558-61. PubMed ID: 20556255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of implant taper on the primary and secondary stability of osseointegrated titanium implants.
O'Sullivan D; Sennerby L; Meredith N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):474-80. PubMed ID: 15248883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of surgical technique, implant shape and diameter on the primary stability in cancellous bone.
Bilhan H; Geckili O; Mumcu E; Bozdag E; Sünbüloğlu E; Kutay O
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Dec; 37(12):900-7. PubMed ID: 20529176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of implant shape, surface morphology, surgical technique and bone quality on the primary stability of dental implants.
Elias CN; Rocha FA; Nascimento AL; Coelho PG
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Dec; 16():169-80. PubMed ID: 23182386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency in the assessment of primary stability and final torque capacity of standard and TiUnite single-tooth implants under immediate loading.
da Cunha HA; Francischone CE; Filho HN; de Oliveira RC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):578-85. PubMed ID: 15346756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison between insertion torque and resonance frequency in the assessment of torque capacity and primary stability of Brånemark system implants.
Turkyilmaz I
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Oct; 33(10):754-9. PubMed ID: 16938104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences in implant stability associated with various methods of preparation of the implant bed: an in vitro study.
Ahn SJ; Leesungbok R; Lee SW; Heo YK; Kang KL
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):366-72. PubMed ID: 22633592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability and morphology) of titanium and dental implant removal torque.
Elias CN; Oshida Y; Lima JH; Muller CA
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2008 Jul; 1(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 19627788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of implant surface topography on bone-regenerative potential and mechanical retention in the human maxilla and mandible.
Wei N; Bin S; Jing Z; Wei S; Yingqiong Z
Am J Dent; 2014 Jun; 27(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 25208367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
