154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19744703)
21. Performance of a low cost magnifying device, Magnivisualizer, versus colposcope for detection of pre-cancer and cancerous lesions of uterine cervix.
Singh V; Parashari A; Gupta S; Sodhani P; Sehgal A
J Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Oct; 25(4):282-6. PubMed ID: 25142620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Random biopsy after colposcopy-directed biopsy improves the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse.
Nam K; Chung S; Kwak J; Cha S; Kim J; Jeon S; Bae D
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2010 Oct; 14(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 20885163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Visual inspection with acetic acid and cytology in the early detection of cervical neoplasia in Kolkata, India.
Basu PS; Sankaranarayanan R; Mandal R; Roy C; Das P; Choudhury D; Bhattacharya D; Chatterjee R; Dutta K; Barik S; Tsu V; Chakrabarti RN; Siddiqi M;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2003; 13(5):626-32. PubMed ID: 14675346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The impact of age and high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) status on the prevalence of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) in women with persistent hrHPV-positive, cytology-negative screening samples: a prospective cohort study.
Tidy JA; Lyon R; Ellis K; Macdonald M; Palmer JE
BJOG; 2020 Sep; 127(10):1260-1267. PubMed ID: 32279427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Is human papillomavirus testing an effective triage method for detection of high-grade (grade 2 or 3) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia?
Adam E; Kaufman RH; Berkova Z; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 178(6):1235-44. PubMed ID: 9662307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Small lesion size measured by colposcopy may predict absence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a large loop excision of the transformation zone specimen.
Munmany M; Marimon L; Cardona M; Nonell R; Juiz M; Astudillo R; Ordi J; Torné A; Del Pino M
BJOG; 2017 Feb; 124(3):495-502. PubMed ID: 27506510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Can Genomic Amplification of Human Telomerase Gene and C-MYC in Liquid-Based Cytological Specimens Be Used as a Method for Opportunistic Cervical Cancer Screening?
Gao K; Eurasian M; Zhang J; Wei Y; Zheng Q; Ye H; Li L
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2015; 80(3):153-63. PubMed ID: 25832290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Quantification of confocal fluorescence microscopy for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Sheikhzadeh F; Ward RK; Carraro A; Chen ZY; van Niekerk D; Miller D; Ehlen T; MacAulay CE; Follen M; Lane PM; Guillaud M
Biomed Eng Online; 2015 Oct; 14():96. PubMed ID: 26499452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Benefit and burden in the Dutch cytology-based vs high-risk human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening program.
Loopik DL; Koenjer LM; Siebers AG; Melchers WJG; Bekkers RLM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 224(2):200.e1-200.e9. PubMed ID: 32800820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Key Determinants of the Value of Random Cervical Biopsy at Colposcopy.
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Burchette RJ; Wu R; Qiao YL
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2019 Oct; 23(4):241-247. PubMed ID: 31592970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnosis of Cervical Precancers by Endocervical Curettage at Colposcopy of Women With Abnormal Cervical Cytology.
Liu AH; Walker J; Gage JC; Gold MA; Zuna R; Dunn ST; Schiffman M; Wentzensen N
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 130(6):1218-1225. PubMed ID: 29112672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. "See and treat" approach is appropriate in women with high-grade lesions on either cervical cytology or colposcopy.
Aue-Aungkul A; Punyawatanasin S; Natprathan A; Srisomboon J; Kietpeerakool C
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(7):1723-6. PubMed ID: 22126552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A prospective evaluation of "see and treat" in women with HSIL Pap smear results: is this an appropriate strategy?
Numnum TM; Kirby TO; Leath CA; Huh WK; Alvarez RD; Straughn JM
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2005 Jan; 9(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 15870514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Confirmation of cervical neoplasia using a hand-held, lighted magnification device.
Winkler JL; Tsu VD; Bishop A; Scott R; Sellors JW
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Apr; 81(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 12676391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Colposcopic management of high-grade referral smears: a retrospective audit supporting 'see and treat'?
Errington CA; Roberts M; Tindle P; Michael E; Bulmer JN; Wadehra V
Cytopathology; 2006 Dec; 17(6):339-47. PubMed ID: 17168916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Acetic acid visualization of the cervix to detect cervical dysplasia.
Van Le L; Broekhuizen FF; Janzer-Steele R; Behar M; Samter T
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Feb; 81(2):293-5. PubMed ID: 8423967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Colposcopy.
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL
Minerva Ginecol; 2012 Apr; 64(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 22481626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A prospective study of risk-based colposcopy demonstrates improved detection of cervical precancers.
Wentzensen N; Walker J; Smith K; Gold MA; Zuna R; Massad LS; Liu A; Silver MI; Dunn ST; Schiffman M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):604.e1-604.e8. PubMed ID: 29462629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix.
Heatley MK; Bury JP
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 9577735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. MiRNA detection in cervical exfoliated cells for missed high-grade lesions in women with LSIL/CIN1 diagnosis after colposcopy-guided biopsy.
Ye J; Cheng XD; Cheng B; Cheng YF; Chen XJ; Lu WG
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jan; 19(1):112. PubMed ID: 30700264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
