409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19744761)
1. Four-year clinical performance and marginal analysis of pressed glass ceramic inlays luted with ormocer restorative vs. conventional luting composite.
Krämer N; Reinelt C; Richter G; Frankenberger R
J Dent; 2009 Nov; 37(11):813-9. PubMed ID: 19744761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Operator vs. material influence on clinical outcome of bonded ceramic inlays.
Frankenberger R; Reinelt C; Petschelt A; Krämer N
Dent Mater; 2009 Aug; 25(8):960-8. PubMed ID: 19344946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ceramic inlays bonded with two adhesives after 4 years.
Krämer N; Ebert J; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 16122784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays luted with self-adhesive resin cement: a 2-year in vivo study.
Taschner M; Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Pelka M; Breschi L; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
Dent Mater; 2012 May; 28(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 22236770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior.
Frankenberger R; Petschelt A; Krämer N
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):459-65. PubMed ID: 11203857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. IPS Empress inlays luted with a self-adhesive resin cement after 1 year.
Taschner M; Frankenberger R; García-Godoy F; Rosenbusch S; Petschelt A; Krämer N
Am J Dent; 2009 Feb; 22(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 19281114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years.
Krämer N; Frankenberger R
Dent Mater; 2005 Mar; 21(3):262-71. PubMed ID: 15705433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. All-ceramic partial coverage restorations--midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical splitmouth study.
Guess PC; Strub JR; Steinhart N; Wolkewitz M; Stappert CF
J Dent; 2009 Aug; 37(8):627-37. PubMed ID: 19477570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite.
Sjögren G; Molin M; van Dijken JW
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 15119879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: two-year clinical follow up.
Coelho Santos MJ; Mondelli RF; Lauris JR; Navarro MF
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 15088722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Totally bonded ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years.
Krämer N; Taschner M; Lohbauer U; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
J Adhes Dent; 2008 Aug; 10(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 18792702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: five-year follow-up.
Santos MJ; Mondelli RF; Navarro MF; Francischone CE; Rubo JH; Santos GC
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 22856680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chairside vs. labside ceramic inlays: effect of temporary restoration and adhesive luting on enamel cracks and marginal integrity.
Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Appelt A; Lohbauer U; Naumann M; Roggendorf MJ
Dent Mater; 2011 Sep; 27(9):892-8. PubMed ID: 21708404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective clinical study of ceromer inlays: results up to 53 months.
Kükrer D; Gemalmaz D; Kuybulu EO; Bozkurt FO
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 15008227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in Class II cavities: clinical results and margin analysis after four years.
Krämer N; Reinelt C; Richter G; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
Dent Mater; 2009 Jun; 25(6):750-9. PubMed ID: 19237189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays after six years: wear of luting composites.
Krämer N; Frankenberger R
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):466-72. PubMed ID: 11203858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short-term clinical evaluation of inlay and onlay restorations made with a ceromer.
Monaco C; Baldissara P; dall'Orologio GD; Scotti R
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 11842911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical study of indirect composite resin inlays in posterior stress-bearing cavities placed by dental students: results after 4 years.
Huth KC; Chen HY; Mehl A; Hickel R; Manhart J
J Dent; 2011 Jul; 39(7):478-88. PubMed ID: 21554920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical investigation of extended ceramic veneers.
Guess PC; Stappert CF
Dent Mater; 2008 Jun; 24(6):804-13. PubMed ID: 18006051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 16 years. Part III: effect of luting agent and tooth or tooth-substitute core structure.
Malament KA; Socransky SS
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):511-9. PubMed ID: 11725279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
