302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19744936)
1. Age differences in collaborative memory: the role of retrieval manipulations.
Meade ML; Roediger HL
Mem Cognit; 2009 Oct; 37(7):962-75. PubMed ID: 19744936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neuropsychological status in older adults influences susceptibility to false memories.
Meade ML; Geraci LD; Roediger HL
Am J Psychol; 2012; 125(4):449-67. PubMed ID: 23350303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of forced recall on illusory recollection in younger and older adults.
Meade ML; Roediger HL
Am J Psychol; 2006; 119(3):433-62. PubMed ID: 17061694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short-term and long-term collaboration benefits on individual recall in younger and older adults.
Blumen HM; Stern Y
Mem Cognit; 2011 Jan; 39(1):147-54. PubMed ID: 21264617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Why two heads apart are better than two heads together: multiple mechanisms underlie the collaborative inhibition effect in memory.
Barber SJ; Harris CB; Rajaram S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):559-66. PubMed ID: 25068855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 1. Evidence from divided attention costs.
Anderson ND; Craik FI; Naveh-Benjamin M
Psychol Aging; 1998 Sep; 13(3):405-23. PubMed ID: 9793117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Age differences in predictions and performance on a cued recall task.
Shaw RJ; Craik FI
Psychol Aging; 1989 Jun; 4(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 2789740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Age differences in adults' free recall, cued recall, and recognition.
Perlmutter M
J Gerontol; 1979 Jul; 34(4):533-9. PubMed ID: 448044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Collaborative inhibition in same-age and mixed-age dyads.
Whillock SR; Meade ML; Hutchison KA; Tsosie MD
Psychol Aging; 2020 Nov; 35(7):963-973. PubMed ID: 32406708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adult age differences in subjective context retrieval in dual-list free recall.
Garlitch SM; Richmond LL; Ball BH; Wahlheim CN
Memory; 2023 Feb; 31(2):218-233. PubMed ID: 36308518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Study repetition and divided attention: effects of encoding manipulations on collaborative inhibition in group recall.
Pereira-Pasarin LP; Rajaram S
Mem Cognit; 2011 Aug; 39(6):968-76. PubMed ID: 21503804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reflections of distraction in memory: transfer of previous distraction improves recall in younger and older adults.
Thomas RC; Hasher L
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 21843024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Age differences in the focus of retrieval: Evidence from dual-list free recall.
Wahlheim CN; Huff MJ
Psychol Aging; 2015 Dec; 30(4):768-80. PubMed ID: 26322551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Age-related differences in guessing on free and forced recall tests.
Huff MJ; Meade ML; Hutchison KA
Memory; 2011 May; 19(4):317-30. PubMed ID: 21678151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Younger and older adults' collaborative recall of shared and unshared emotional pictures.
Barber SJ; Castrellon JJ; Opitz P; Mather M
Mem Cognit; 2017 Jul; 45(5):716-730. PubMed ID: 28224452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of repeated collaborative retrieval on individual memory vary as a function of recall versus recognition tasks.
Blumen HM; Rajaram S
Memory; 2009 Nov; 17(8):840-6. PubMed ID: 19882435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modeling intrusions and correct recall in episodic memory: adult age differences in encoding of list context.
Kliegl R; Lindenberger U
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1993 May; 19(3):617-37. PubMed ID: 8501432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exploring the relationship between retrieval disruption from collaboration and recall.
Barber SJ; Rajaram S
Memory; 2011 Jul; 19(5):462-9. PubMed ID: 21736433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Age differences in false memory: The importance of retrieval monitoring processes and their modulation by memory quality.
Fandakova Y; Sander MC; Grandy TH; Cabeza R; Werkle-Bergner M; Shing YL
Psychol Aging; 2018 Feb; 33(1):119-133. PubMed ID: 29494183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multiple causes of collaborative inhibition in memory for categorised word lists.
Hyman IE; Cardwell BA; Roy RA
Memory; 2013; 21(7):875-90. PubMed ID: 23439153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
