These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19744936)

  • 1. Age differences in collaborative memory: the role of retrieval manipulations.
    Meade ML; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Oct; 37(7):962-75. PubMed ID: 19744936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neuropsychological status in older adults influences susceptibility to false memories.
    Meade ML; Geraci LD; Roediger HL
    Am J Psychol; 2012; 125(4):449-67. PubMed ID: 23350303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of forced recall on illusory recollection in younger and older adults.
    Meade ML; Roediger HL
    Am J Psychol; 2006; 119(3):433-62. PubMed ID: 17061694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short-term and long-term collaboration benefits on individual recall in younger and older adults.
    Blumen HM; Stern Y
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Jan; 39(1):147-54. PubMed ID: 21264617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Why two heads apart are better than two heads together: multiple mechanisms underlie the collaborative inhibition effect in memory.
    Barber SJ; Harris CB; Rajaram S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):559-66. PubMed ID: 25068855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 1. Evidence from divided attention costs.
    Anderson ND; Craik FI; Naveh-Benjamin M
    Psychol Aging; 1998 Sep; 13(3):405-23. PubMed ID: 9793117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age differences in predictions and performance on a cued recall task.
    Shaw RJ; Craik FI
    Psychol Aging; 1989 Jun; 4(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 2789740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Age differences in adults' free recall, cued recall, and recognition.
    Perlmutter M
    J Gerontol; 1979 Jul; 34(4):533-9. PubMed ID: 448044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Collaborative inhibition in same-age and mixed-age dyads.
    Whillock SR; Meade ML; Hutchison KA; Tsosie MD
    Psychol Aging; 2020 Nov; 35(7):963-973. PubMed ID: 32406708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Study repetition and divided attention: effects of encoding manipulations on collaborative inhibition in group recall.
    Pereira-Pasarin LP; Rajaram S
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Aug; 39(6):968-76. PubMed ID: 21503804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adult age differences in subjective context retrieval in dual-list free recall.
    Garlitch SM; Richmond LL; Ball BH; Wahlheim CN
    Memory; 2023 Feb; 31(2):218-233. PubMed ID: 36308518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reflections of distraction in memory: transfer of previous distraction improves recall in younger and older adults.
    Thomas RC; Hasher L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 21843024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age differences in the focus of retrieval: Evidence from dual-list free recall.
    Wahlheim CN; Huff MJ
    Psychol Aging; 2015 Dec; 30(4):768-80. PubMed ID: 26322551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age-related differences in guessing on free and forced recall tests.
    Huff MJ; Meade ML; Hutchison KA
    Memory; 2011 May; 19(4):317-30. PubMed ID: 21678151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Younger and older adults' collaborative recall of shared and unshared emotional pictures.
    Barber SJ; Castrellon JJ; Opitz P; Mather M
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jul; 45(5):716-730. PubMed ID: 28224452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of repeated collaborative retrieval on individual memory vary as a function of recall versus recognition tasks.
    Blumen HM; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2009 Nov; 17(8):840-6. PubMed ID: 19882435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling intrusions and correct recall in episodic memory: adult age differences in encoding of list context.
    Kliegl R; Lindenberger U
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1993 May; 19(3):617-37. PubMed ID: 8501432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring the relationship between retrieval disruption from collaboration and recall.
    Barber SJ; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2011 Jul; 19(5):462-9. PubMed ID: 21736433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age differences in false memory: The importance of retrieval monitoring processes and their modulation by memory quality.
    Fandakova Y; Sander MC; Grandy TH; Cabeza R; Werkle-Bergner M; Shing YL
    Psychol Aging; 2018 Feb; 33(1):119-133. PubMed ID: 29494183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple causes of collaborative inhibition in memory for categorised word lists.
    Hyman IE; Cardwell BA; Roy RA
    Memory; 2013; 21(7):875-90. PubMed ID: 23439153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.