These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19745062)

  • 1. Oral fluid testing for drugs of abuse.
    Bosker WM; Huestis MA
    Clin Chem; 2009 Nov; 55(11):1910-31. PubMed ID: 19745062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Oral Fluid Drug Testing: Analytical Approaches, Issues and Interpretation of Results.
    Desrosiers NA; Huestis MA
    J Anal Toxicol; 2019 Jul; 43(6):415-443. PubMed ID: 31263897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prevalence and disposition of drugs of abuse and opioid treatment drugs in oral fluid.
    Cone EJ; Clarke J; Tsanaclis L
    J Anal Toxicol; 2007 Oct; 31(8):424-33. PubMed ID: 17988455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of an oral fluid screening test device for substance abuse at traffic controls.
    Avcioglu G; Yilmaz G; Yalcin Sahiner S; Kozaci LD; Bal C; Yilmaz FM
    Clin Biochem; 2021 Jul; 93():112-118. PubMed ID: 33882283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Roadside oral fluid testing: comparison of the results of drugwipe 5 and drugwipe benzodiazepines on-site tests with laboratory confirmation results of oral fluid and whole blood.
    Pehrsson A; Gunnar T; Engblom C; Seppä H; Jama A; Lillsunde P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Mar; 175(2-3):140-8. PubMed ID: 17640837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new ultraperformance-tandem mass spectrometry oral fluid assay for 29 illicit drugs and medications.
    Huestis MA
    Clin Chem; 2009 Dec; 55(12):2079-81. PubMed ID: 19833833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analytical reliability of four oral fluid point-of-collection testing devices for drug detection in drivers.
    Scherer JN; Schuch JB; Rabelo-da-Ponte FD; Silvestrin R; Ornell R; Sousa T; Limberger RP; Pechansky F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Oct; 315():110434. PubMed ID: 32758788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of on-site oral fluid drug screening devices DrugWipe 5+ and Rapid STAT using oral fluid for confirmation analysis.
    Pehrsson A; Blencowe T; Vimpari K; Langel K; Engblom C; Lillsunde P
    J Anal Toxicol; 2011 May; 35(4):211-8. PubMed ID: 21513614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimum methadone compliance testing: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006; 6(21):1-54. PubMed ID: 23074492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of Dräger DrugTest 5000 in a Naturalistic Setting.
    Gjerde H; Clausen GB; Andreassen E; Furuhaugen H
    J Anal Toxicol; 2018 May; 42(4):248-254. PubMed ID: 29409046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cocaine and benzoylecgonine oral fluid on-site screening and confirmation.
    Ellefsen KN; Concheiro M; Pirard S; Gorelick DA; Huestis MA
    Drug Test Anal; 2016; 8(3-4):296-303. PubMed ID: 26968560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A review of drug abuse in recently reported cases of driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) in Asia, USA, and Europe.
    Ji Kwon N; Han E
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Sep; 302():109854. PubMed ID: 31255839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance evaluation of on-site oral fluid drug screening devices in normal police procedure in Germany.
    Musshoff F; Hokamp EG; Bott U; Madea B
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 May; 238():120-4. PubMed ID: 24699311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Drugged Driving in Wisconsin: Oral Fluid Versus Blood.
    Edwards LD; Smith KL; Savage T
    J Anal Toxicol; 2017 Jul; 41(6):523-529. PubMed ID: 28830121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of Drugs in Oral Fluid Samples Using a Commercially Available Collection Device: Agreement with Urine Testing and Evaluation of A and B Samples Obtained from Employees at Different Workplace Settings with Uncontrolled Sampling Procedures.
    Zheng Y; Sparve E; Sparring S; Bergström M
    J Anal Toxicol; 2021 Jan; 44(9):1004-1011. PubMed ID: 32128555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The potential role of oral fluid in antidoping testing.
    Anizan S; Huestis MA
    Clin Chem; 2014 Feb; 60(2):307-22. PubMed ID: 24153253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simultaneous screening and quantification of 29 drugs of abuse in oral fluid by solid-phase extraction and ultraperformance LC-MS/MS.
    Badawi N; Simonsen KW; Steentoft A; Bernhoft IM; Linnet K
    Clin Chem; 2009 Nov; 55(11):2004-18. PubMed ID: 19797719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An analytical evaluation of eight on-site oral fluid drug screening devices using laboratory confirmation results from oral fluid.
    Blencowe T; Pehrsson A; Lillsunde P; Vimpari K; Houwing S; Smink B; Mathijssen R; Van der Linden T; Legrand SA; Pil K; Verstraete A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):173-9. PubMed ID: 21183299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Drugs of abuse in oral fluid collected by two different sample kits--stability testing and validation using ultra performance tandem mass spectrometry analysis.
    Lund HM; Øiestad EL; Gjerde H; Christophersen AS
    J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2011 Nov; 879(30):3367-77. PubMed ID: 21962269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification and quantitation of amphetamines, cocaine, opiates, and phencyclidine in oral fluid by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
    Fritch D; Blum K; Nonnemacher S; Haggerty BJ; Sullivan MP; Cone EJ
    J Anal Toxicol; 2009; 33(9):569-77. PubMed ID: 20040131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.