These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19745749)

  • 21. The impact of proband mediated information dissemination in families with a BRCA1/2 gene mutation.
    Sermijn E; Goelen G; Teugels E; Kaufman L; Bonduelle M; Neyns B; Poppe B; De Paepe A; De Grève J
    J Med Genet; 2004 Mar; 41(3):e23. PubMed ID: 14985394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A whisper-game perspective on the family communication of DNA-test results: a retrospective study on the communication process of BRCA1/2-test results between proband and relatives.
    Vos J; Menko F; Jansen AM; van Asperen CJ; Stiggelbout AM; Tibben A
    Fam Cancer; 2011 Mar; 10(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 20852944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinically Significant Unclassified Variants in
    Yoon KA; Park B; Lee BI; Yang MJ; Kong SY; Lee ES
    Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Jul; 49(3):627-634. PubMed ID: 27658390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Uptake, Results, and Outcomes of Germline Multiple-Gene Sequencing After Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.
    Kurian AW; Ward KC; Hamilton AS; Deapen DM; Abrahamse P; Bondarenko I; Li Y; Hawley ST; Morrow M; Jagsi R; Katz SJ
    JAMA Oncol; 2018 Aug; 4(8):1066-1072. PubMed ID: 29801090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Consolidated BRCA1/2 Variant Interpretation by MH BRCA Correlates with Predicted PARP Inhibitor Efficacy Association by MH Guide.
    Hirotsu Y; Schmidt-Edelkraut U; Nakagomi H; Sakamoto I; Hartenfeller M; Narang R; Soldatos TG; Kaduthanam S; Wang X; Hettich S; Brock S; Jackson DB; Omata M
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 May; 21(11):. PubMed ID: 32486089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Decision making with uncertain information: learning from women in a high risk breast cancer clinic.
    Frost CJ; Venne V; Cunningham D; Gerritsen-McKane R
    J Genet Couns; 2004 Jun; 13(3):221-36. PubMed ID: 15604633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Associations between relationship support and psychological reactions of participants and partners to BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing in a clinic-based sample.
    Manne S; Audrain J; Schwartz M; Main D; Finch C; Lerman C
    Ann Behav Med; 2004 Dec; 28(3):211-25. PubMed ID: 15576260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in Sardinian breast cancer families and their implications for genetic counseling.
    Palmieri G; Palomba G; Cossu A; Pisano M; Dedola MF; Sarobba MG; Farris A; Olmeo N; Contu A; Pasca A; Satta MP; Persico I; Carboni AA; Cossu-Rocca P; Contini M; Mangion J; Stratton MR; Tanda F
    Ann Oncol; 2002 Dec; 13(12):1899-907. PubMed ID: 12453858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Genetic counseling does not fulfill the counselees' need for certainty in hereditary breast/ovarian cancer families: an explorative assessment.
    Vos J; Menko FH; Oosterwijk JC; van Asperen CJ; Stiggelbout AM; Tibben A
    Psychooncology; 2013 May; 22(5):1167-76. PubMed ID: 22777929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. BRCA mutation-negative women from hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families: a qualitative study of the BRCA-negative experience.
    Bakos AD; Hutson SP; Loud JT; Peters JA; Giusti RM; Greene MH
    Health Expect; 2008 Sep; 11(3):220-31. PubMed ID: 18816319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing on psychologic distress in a clinic-based sample.
    Schwartz MD; Peshkin BN; Hughes C; Main D; Isaacs C; Lerman C
    J Clin Oncol; 2002 Jan; 20(2):514-20. PubMed ID: 11786581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A counselee-oriented perspective on risk communication in genetic counseling: explaining the inaccuracy of the counselees' risk perception shortly after BRCA1/2 test result disclosure.
    Vos J; Stiggelbout AM; Oosterwijk J; Gomez-Garcia E; Menko F; Collee JM; van Asperen CJ; Tibben A
    Genet Med; 2011 Sep; 13(9):800-11. PubMed ID: 21885922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Short-term psychological impact of the BRCA1/2 test result in women with breast cancer according to their perceived probability of genetic predisposition to cancer.
    Brédart A; Kop JL; Depauw A; Caron O; Sultan S; Leblond D; Fajac A; Buecher B; Gauthier-Villars M; Noguès C; Flahault C; Stoppa-Lyonnet D; Dolbeault S
    Br J Cancer; 2013 Mar; 108(5):1012-20. PubMed ID: 23462725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interest in BRCA1/2 testing in a primary care population.
    Armstrong K; Weber B; Ubel PA; Guerra C; Schwartz JS
    Prev Med; 2002 Jun; 34(6):590-5. PubMed ID: 12052018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Theory development from studies with young women with breast cancer who are BRCA mutation negative.
    Hamilton R; Kopin S
    ANS Adv Nurs Sci; 2013; 36(2):E41-53. PubMed ID: 23644270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. More breast cancer patients prefer BRCA-mutation testing without prior face-to-face genetic counseling.
    Sie AS; van Zelst-Stams WA; Spruijt L; Mensenkamp AR; Ligtenberg MJ; Brunner HG; Prins JB; Hoogerbrugge N
    Fam Cancer; 2014 Jun; 13(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 24068317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. "I Don't Want to Be an Ostrich": Managing Mothers' Uncertainty during BRCA1/2 Genetic Counseling.
    Fisher CL; Roccotagliata T; Rising CJ; Kissane DW; Glogowski EA; Bylund CL
    J Genet Couns; 2017 Jun; 26(3):455-468. PubMed ID: 27473644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38.
    Concolino P; Gelli G; Rizza R; Costella A; Scambia G; Capoluongo E
    Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Jul; 20(14):. PubMed ID: 31336956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Talking across generations: Family communication about BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic cancer risk.
    Young AL; Butow PN; Rhodes P; Tucker KM; Williams R; Healey E; Wakefield CE
    J Genet Couns; 2019 Jun; 28(3):516-532. PubMed ID: 30694012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions, and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a randomized controlled trial.
    Green MJ; Peterson SK; Baker MW; Harper GR; Friedman LC; Rubinstein WS; Mauger DT
    JAMA; 2004 Jul; 292(4):442-52. PubMed ID: 15280342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.