243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19746755)
1. Temporalis fascia and cartilage-perichondrium composite shield grafts for reconstruction of the tympanic membrane.
Yetiser S; Hidir Y
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2009 Aug; 118(8):570-4. PubMed ID: 19746755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of two myringoplasty techniques in Nepalese children: a prospective randomized trial.
Tripathi P; Guragain RP; Bhusal CL; Karna SL; Borgstein J
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1556-60. PubMed ID: 26231742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Type 1 tympanoplasty in pediatric patients: Comparison of fascia and perichondrium grafts.
Çayir S; Kayabaşi S
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Jun; 121():95-98. PubMed ID: 30878559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three autologous substitutes for myringoplasty: a comparative study.
Zhang ZG; Huang QH; Zheng YQ; Sun W; Chen YB; Si Y
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Oct; 32(8):1234-8. PubMed ID: 21921853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the anatomical and functional success of fascia and perichondrium grafts in transcanal endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty.
Özdamar K; Sen A
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Nov; 48(1):67. PubMed ID: 31771648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cartilage rim augmented fascia tympanoplasty: a more effective composite graft model than temporalis fascia tympanoplasty.
Kolethekkat AA; Al Abri R; Al Zaabi K; Al Marhoobi N; Jose S; Pillai S; Mathew J
J Laryngol Otol; 2018 Jun; 132(6):497-504. PubMed ID: 29888699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Results of myringoplasty and type I tympanoplasty with the use of fascia, cartilage and perichondrium grafts].
Gierek T; Slaska-Kaspera A; Majzel K; Klimczak-Gołab L
Otolaryngol Pol; 2004; 58(3):529-33. PubMed ID: 15311598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Hearing Result and Graft Uptake Rate between Temporalis Fascia and Tragal Cartilage in Endoscopic Myringoplasty.
Shrestha BL; Shakya S; Pradhan A; Dhakal A; Kc AK; Shrestha KS; Pokharel M
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2022; 20(79):359-365. PubMed ID: 37042380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between clinical and audiological results of tympanoplasty with double layer graft (modified sandwich fascia) technique and single layer graft (underlay fascia and underlay cartilage) technique.
Nemade SV; Shinde KJ; Sampate PB
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Jun; 45(3):440-446. PubMed ID: 28855058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of cartilage graft and fascia in type 1 tympanoplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yang T; Wu X; Peng X; Zhang Y; Xie S; Sun H
Acta Otolaryngol; 2016 Nov; 136(11):1085-1090. PubMed ID: 27310768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endoscopic cartilage versus temporalis fascia grafting for anterior quadrant tympanic perforations - A prospective study in a tertiary care hospital.
Mohanty S; Manimaran V; Umamaheswaran P; Jeyabalakrishnan S; Chelladurai S
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Oct; 45(5):936-942. PubMed ID: 29397250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of results of graft uptake using tragal cartilage perichondrium composite graft versus temporalis fascia in patients undergoing surgery for chronic otitis media - squamous type.
Khalilullah S; Shah SP; Yadav D; Shrivastav RP; Bhattarai H
Head Face Med; 2016 Aug; 12(1):26. PubMed ID: 27485368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of temporalis fascia muscle and full-thickness cartilage grafts in type 1 pediatric tympanoplasties.
Yegin Y; Çelik M; Koç AK; Küfeciler L; Elbistanlı MS; Kayhan FT
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2016; 82(6):695-701. PubMed ID: 27068884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Audiological and graft take results of cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty (a new technique) versus fascia.
Tek A; Karaman M; Uslu C; Habeşoğlu T; Kılıçarslan Y; Durmuş R; Esen S; Egeli E
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Apr; 269(4):1117-26. PubMed ID: 21968630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Temporalis Fascia and Transcanal Composite Chondroperichondrial Tympanoplasty Techniques.
Gozeler MS; Sahin A
Ear Nose Throat J; 2021 Mar; 100(3):192-195. PubMed ID: 31544506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized study comparing fascia and cartilage grafts in myringoplasty.
Yung M; Vivekanandan S; Smith P
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2011 Aug; 120(8):535-41. PubMed ID: 21922978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The button graft technique for perforations affecting less than 25% of the tympanic membrane: a non-randomised comparison of a new modification to cartilage tympanoplasty with underlay and overlay grafts.
Abdelghany AM
Clin Otolaryngol; 2013 Jun; 38(3):208-16. PubMed ID: 23745532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Type 1 tympanoplasty in patients with large perforations: Comparison of temporalis fascia, partial-thickness cartilage, and full-thickness cartilage.
Xing C; Liu H; Li G; Li J; Li X
J Int Med Res; 2020 Aug; 48(8):300060520945140. PubMed ID: 32790512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fascia versus cartilage graft in type I tympanoplasty: audiological outcome.
Kim JY; Oh JH; Lee HH
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(6):e605-8. PubMed ID: 23172493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of temporalis fascia and tragal cartilage grafts in type 1 tympanoplasty in elderly patients.
Guler I; Baklaci D; Kuzucu I; Kum RO; Ozcan M
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2019 Jun; 46(3):319-323. PubMed ID: 30224101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
