BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19748002)

  • 1. Computer-aided detection (CAD) as a second reader using perspective filet view at CT colonography: effect on performance of inexperienced readers.
    Fisichella VA; Jäderling F; Horvath S; Stotzer PO; Kilander A; Båth M; Hellström M
    Clin Radiol; 2009 Oct; 64(10):972-82. PubMed ID: 19748002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Primary three-dimensional analysis with perspective-filet view versus primary two-dimensional analysis: evaluation of lesion detection by inexperienced readers at computed tomographic colonography in symptomatic patients.
    Fisichella VA; Jäderling F; Horvath S; Stotzer PO; Kilander A; Hellström M
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Apr; 50(3):244-55. PubMed ID: 19235581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of computer-aided detection false-positives on reader performance and diagnostic confidence for CT colonography.
    Taylor SA; Brittenden J; Lenton J; Lambie H; Goldstone A; Wylie PN; Tolan D; Burling D; Honeyfield L; Bassett P; Halligan S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jun; 192(6):1682-9. PubMed ID: 19457835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy of computer-aided detection as a second reader for 6-9-mm lesions at CT colonography: multicenter prospective trial.
    Regge D; Della Monica P; Galatola G; Laudi C; Zambon A; Correale L; Asnaghi R; Barbaro B; Borghi C; Campanella D; Cassinis MC; Ferrari R; Ferraris A; Hassan C; Golfieri R; Iafrate F; Iussich G; Laghi A; Massara R; Neri E; Sali L; Venturini S; Gandini G
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):168-76. PubMed ID: 23151831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-aided detection for computed tomographic colonography screening: a prospective comparison of a double-reading paradigm with first-reader computer-aided detection against second-reader computer-aided detection.
    Iussich G; Correale L; Senore C; Hassan C; Segnan N; Campanella D; Bert A; Galatola G; Laudi C; Regge D
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 24442160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CT colonography: role of a second reader CAD paradigm in the initial training of radiologists.
    Neri E; Faggioni L; Regge D; Vagli P; Turini F; Cerri F; Picano E; Giusti S; Bartolozzi C
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):303-9. PubMed ID: 20832219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CT colonography: preliminary assessment of a double-read paradigm that uses computer-aided detection as the first reader.
    Iussich G; Correale L; Senore C; Segnan N; Laghi A; Iafrate F; Campanella D; Neri E; Cerri F; Hassan C; Regge D
    Radiology; 2013 Sep; 268(3):743-51. PubMed ID: 23630310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study.
    Petrick N; Haider M; Summers RM; Yeshwant SC; Brown L; Iuliano EM; Louie A; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
    Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):148-56. PubMed ID: 18096536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Virtual dissection CT colonography: evaluation of learning curves and reading times with and without computer-aided detection.
    Hock D; Ouhadi R; Materne R; Aouchria AS; Mancini I; Broussaud T; Magotteaux P; Nchimi A
    Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):860-8. PubMed ID: 18710980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer-based self-training for CT colonography with and without CAD.
    Sali L; Delsanto S; Sacchetto D; Correale L; Falchini M; Ferraris A; Gandini G; Grazzini G; Iafrate F; Iussich G; Morra L; Laghi A; Mascalchi M; Regge D
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):4783-4791. PubMed ID: 29796918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CT colonography: influence of 3D viewing and polyp candidate features on interpretation with computer-aided detection.
    Shi R; Schraedley-Desmond P; Napel S; Olcott EW; Jeffrey RB; Yee J; Zalis ME; Margolis D; Paik DS; Sherbondy AJ; Sundaram P; Beaulieu CF
    Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):768-76. PubMed ID: 16714460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of a unidirectional panoramic 3D endoluminal interpretation technique to traditional 2D and bidirectional 3D interpretation techniques at CT colonography: preliminary observations.
    Lenhart DK; Babb J; Bonavita J; Kim D; Bini EJ; Megibow AJ; Macari M
    Clin Radiol; 2010 Feb; 65(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 20103433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [CT colonography: evaluation of two 3D algorithms in a screening population].
    Juchems MS; Ernst AS; Sheafor DH; Carrascosa P; Virmany S; Brambs HJ; Aschoff AJ
    Rofo; 2009 Jun; 181(6):573-8. PubMed ID: 19440949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer-aided detection (CAD) using 360 degree virtual dissection: can CAD in a first reviewer paradigm be a reliable substitute for primary 2D or 3D search?
    Johnson KT; Fletcher JG; Johnson CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 189(4):W172-6. PubMed ID: 17885028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of computer-aided detection markers on visual search and reader performance during concurrent reading of CT colonography.
    Helbren E; Fanshawe TR; Phillips P; Mallett S; Boone D; Gale A; Altman DG; Taylor SA; Manning D; Halligan S
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Jun; 25(6):1570-8. PubMed ID: 25577518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CT colonography and computer-aided detection: effect of false-positive results on reader specificity and reading efficiency in a low-prevalence screening population.
    Taylor SA; Greenhalgh R; Ilangovan R; Tam E; Sahni VA; Burling D; Zhang J; Bassett P; Pickhardt PJ; Halligan S
    Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):133-40. PubMed ID: 18292478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CT colonography: investigation of the optimum reader paradigm by using computer-aided detection software.
    Taylor SA; Charman SC; Lefere P; McFarland EG; Paulson EK; Yee J; Aslam R; Barlow JM; Gupta A; Kim DH; Miller CM; Halligan S
    Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):463-71. PubMed ID: 18094263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software.
    Taylor SA; Halligan S; Slater A; Goh V; Burling DN; Roddie ME; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
    Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):759-67. PubMed ID: 16543593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CT colonography: effect of computer-aided detection of colonic polyps as a second and concurrent reader for general radiologists with moderate experience in CT colonography.
    Mang T; Bogoni L; Anand VX; Chandra D; Curtin AJ; Lev-Toaff AS; Hermosillo G; Noah R; Raykar V; Salganicoff M; Shaw R; Summerton S; Tappouni RF; Ringel H; Weber M; Wolf M; Obuchowski NA
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Jul; 24(7):1466-76. PubMed ID: 24816931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of a previously validated CT colonography computer-aided detection system in a new patient population.
    Summers RM; Handwerker LR; Pickhardt PJ; Van Uitert RL; Deshpande KK; Yeshwant S; Yao J; Franaszek M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):168-74. PubMed ID: 18562741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.