These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19748002)

  • 1. Computer-aided detection (CAD) as a second reader using perspective filet view at CT colonography: effect on performance of inexperienced readers.
    Fisichella VA; Jäderling F; Horvath S; Stotzer PO; Kilander A; Båth M; Hellström M
    Clin Radiol; 2009 Oct; 64(10):972-82. PubMed ID: 19748002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Primary three-dimensional analysis with perspective-filet view versus primary two-dimensional analysis: evaluation of lesion detection by inexperienced readers at computed tomographic colonography in symptomatic patients.
    Fisichella VA; Jäderling F; Horvath S; Stotzer PO; Kilander A; Hellström M
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Apr; 50(3):244-55. PubMed ID: 19235581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of computer-aided detection false-positives on reader performance and diagnostic confidence for CT colonography.
    Taylor SA; Brittenden J; Lenton J; Lambie H; Goldstone A; Wylie PN; Tolan D; Burling D; Honeyfield L; Bassett P; Halligan S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jun; 192(6):1682-9. PubMed ID: 19457835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy of computer-aided detection as a second reader for 6-9-mm lesions at CT colonography: multicenter prospective trial.
    Regge D; Della Monica P; Galatola G; Laudi C; Zambon A; Correale L; Asnaghi R; Barbaro B; Borghi C; Campanella D; Cassinis MC; Ferrari R; Ferraris A; Hassan C; Golfieri R; Iafrate F; Iussich G; Laghi A; Massara R; Neri E; Sali L; Venturini S; Gandini G
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):168-76. PubMed ID: 23151831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-aided detection for computed tomographic colonography screening: a prospective comparison of a double-reading paradigm with first-reader computer-aided detection against second-reader computer-aided detection.
    Iussich G; Correale L; Senore C; Hassan C; Segnan N; Campanella D; Bert A; Galatola G; Laudi C; Regge D
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 24442160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CT colonography: role of a second reader CAD paradigm in the initial training of radiologists.
    Neri E; Faggioni L; Regge D; Vagli P; Turini F; Cerri F; Picano E; Giusti S; Bartolozzi C
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):303-9. PubMed ID: 20832219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CT colonography: preliminary assessment of a double-read paradigm that uses computer-aided detection as the first reader.
    Iussich G; Correale L; Senore C; Segnan N; Laghi A; Iafrate F; Campanella D; Neri E; Cerri F; Hassan C; Regge D
    Radiology; 2013 Sep; 268(3):743-51. PubMed ID: 23630310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study.
    Petrick N; Haider M; Summers RM; Yeshwant SC; Brown L; Iuliano EM; Louie A; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
    Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):148-56. PubMed ID: 18096536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Virtual dissection CT colonography: evaluation of learning curves and reading times with and without computer-aided detection.
    Hock D; Ouhadi R; Materne R; Aouchria AS; Mancini I; Broussaud T; Magotteaux P; Nchimi A
    Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):860-8. PubMed ID: 18710980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer-based self-training for CT colonography with and without CAD.
    Sali L; Delsanto S; Sacchetto D; Correale L; Falchini M; Ferraris A; Gandini G; Grazzini G; Iafrate F; Iussich G; Morra L; Laghi A; Mascalchi M; Regge D
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):4783-4791. PubMed ID: 29796918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CT colonography: influence of 3D viewing and polyp candidate features on interpretation with computer-aided detection.
    Shi R; Schraedley-Desmond P; Napel S; Olcott EW; Jeffrey RB; Yee J; Zalis ME; Margolis D; Paik DS; Sherbondy AJ; Sundaram P; Beaulieu CF
    Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):768-76. PubMed ID: 16714460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of a unidirectional panoramic 3D endoluminal interpretation technique to traditional 2D and bidirectional 3D interpretation techniques at CT colonography: preliminary observations.
    Lenhart DK; Babb J; Bonavita J; Kim D; Bini EJ; Megibow AJ; Macari M
    Clin Radiol; 2010 Feb; 65(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 20103433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [CT colonography: evaluation of two 3D algorithms in a screening population].
    Juchems MS; Ernst AS; Sheafor DH; Carrascosa P; Virmany S; Brambs HJ; Aschoff AJ
    Rofo; 2009 Jun; 181(6):573-8. PubMed ID: 19440949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer-aided detection (CAD) using 360 degree virtual dissection: can CAD in a first reviewer paradigm be a reliable substitute for primary 2D or 3D search?
    Johnson KT; Fletcher JG; Johnson CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 189(4):W172-6. PubMed ID: 17885028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of computer-aided detection markers on visual search and reader performance during concurrent reading of CT colonography.
    Helbren E; Fanshawe TR; Phillips P; Mallett S; Boone D; Gale A; Altman DG; Taylor SA; Manning D; Halligan S
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Jun; 25(6):1570-8. PubMed ID: 25577518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CT colonography and computer-aided detection: effect of false-positive results on reader specificity and reading efficiency in a low-prevalence screening population.
    Taylor SA; Greenhalgh R; Ilangovan R; Tam E; Sahni VA; Burling D; Zhang J; Bassett P; Pickhardt PJ; Halligan S
    Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):133-40. PubMed ID: 18292478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CT colonography: investigation of the optimum reader paradigm by using computer-aided detection software.
    Taylor SA; Charman SC; Lefere P; McFarland EG; Paulson EK; Yee J; Aslam R; Barlow JM; Gupta A; Kim DH; Miller CM; Halligan S
    Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):463-71. PubMed ID: 18094263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software.
    Taylor SA; Halligan S; Slater A; Goh V; Burling DN; Roddie ME; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
    Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):759-67. PubMed ID: 16543593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CT colonography: effect of computer-aided detection of colonic polyps as a second and concurrent reader for general radiologists with moderate experience in CT colonography.
    Mang T; Bogoni L; Anand VX; Chandra D; Curtin AJ; Lev-Toaff AS; Hermosillo G; Noah R; Raykar V; Salganicoff M; Shaw R; Summerton S; Tappouni RF; Ringel H; Weber M; Wolf M; Obuchowski NA
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Jul; 24(7):1466-76. PubMed ID: 24816931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of a previously validated CT colonography computer-aided detection system in a new patient population.
    Summers RM; Handwerker LR; Pickhardt PJ; Van Uitert RL; Deshpande KK; Yeshwant S; Yao J; Franaszek M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):168-74. PubMed ID: 18562741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.