These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19748208)

  • 1. Revision of failed total hip arthroplasty acetabular cups to porous tantalum components: a 5-year follow-up study.
    Fernández-Fairen M; Murcia A; Blanco A; Meroño A; Murcia A; Ballester J
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Sep; 25(6):865-72. PubMed ID: 19748208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Porous tantalum uncemented acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty: a minimum ten-year clinical, radiological and quality of life outcome study.
    Konan S; Duncan CP; Masri BA; Garbuz DS
    Bone Joint J; 2016 Jun; 98-B(6):767-71. PubMed ID: 27235518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does the Risk of Rerevision Vary Between Porous Tantalum Cups and Other Cementless Designs After Revision Hip Arthroplasty?
    Laaksonen I; Lorimer M; Gromov K; Rolfson O; Mäkelä KT; Graves SE; Malchau H; Mohaddes M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 475(12):3015-3022. PubMed ID: 28646360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcome of porous tantalum acetabular components for Paprosky type 3 and 4 acetabular defects.
    Batuyong ED; Brock HS; Thiruvengadam N; Maloney WJ; Goodman SB; Huddleston JI
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1318-22. PubMed ID: 24405625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Use of Porous Tantalum Augments for the Reconstruction of Acetabular Defect in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Ling TX; Li JL; Zhou K; Xiao Q; Pei FX; Zhou ZK
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):453-459. PubMed ID: 29033154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a porous tantalum uncemented acetabular cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical and radiological results of 60 hips.
    Unger AS; Lewis RJ; Gruen T
    J Arthroplasty; 2005 Dec; 20(8):1002-9. PubMed ID: 16376255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Porous tantalum shells and augments for acetabular cup revisions.
    Moličnik A; Hanc M; Rečnik G; Krajnc Z; Rupreht M; Fokter SK
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2014 Aug; 24(6):911-7. PubMed ID: 24241214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uncemented porous tantalum acetabular components: early follow-up and failures in 613 primary total hip arthroplasties.
    Noiseux NO; Long WJ; Mabry TM; Hanssen AD; Lewallen DG
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Mar; 29(3):617-20. PubMed ID: 23993435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modular tantalum augments for acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty.
    Siegmeth A; Duncan CP; Masri BA; Kim WY; Garbuz DS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2009 Jan; 467(1):199-205. PubMed ID: 18923882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trabecular metal used for major bone loss in acetabular hip revision.
    Davies JH; Laflamme GY; Delisle J; Fernandes J
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1245-50. PubMed ID: 21481564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do tantalum components provide adequate primary fixation in all acetabular revisions?
    Flecher X; Paprosky W; Grillo JC; Aubaniac JM; Argenson JN
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 May; 96(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 20488141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are porous tantalum cups superior to conventional reinforcement rings?
    Brüggemann A; Fredlund E; Mallmin H; Hailer NP
    Acta Orthop; 2017 Feb; 88(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 27892748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiostereometric analysis study of tantalum compared with titanium acetabular cups and highly cross-linked compared with conventional liners in young patients undergoing total hip replacement.
    Ayers DC; Greene M; Snyder B; Aubin M; Drew J; Bragdon C
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Apr; 97(8):627-34. PubMed ID: 25878306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tantalum components in difficult acetabular revisions.
    Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):454-8. PubMed ID: 19582528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Survivorship of a Porous Tantalum Monoblock Acetabular Component in Primary Hip Arthroplasty With a Mean Follow-Up of 18 Years.
    Macheras GA; Lepetsos P; Leonidou AO; Anastasopoulos PP; Galanakos SP; Poultsides LA
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Dec; 32(12):3680-3684. PubMed ID: 28734611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative survival analysis of porous tantalum and porous titanium acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty.
    Vutescu ES; Hsiue P; Paprosky W; Nandi S
    Hip Int; 2017 Sep; 27(5):505-508. PubMed ID: 28165603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiographic and clinical analysis of cementless acetabular fixation in total hip arthroplasty.
    Zhang H; Pei FX; Yang J; Shen B; Shi R
    Chin J Traumatol; 2005 Oct; 8(5):263-8. PubMed ID: 16176755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Stability of the Porous Tantalum Components Used in Revision THA to Treat Severe Acetabular Defects: A Radiostereometric Analysis Study.
    Solomon LB; Abrahams JM; Callary SA; Howie DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Nov; 100(22):1926-1933. PubMed ID: 30480597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do tantalum and titanium cups show similar results in revision hip arthroplasty?
    Jafari SM; Bender B; Coyle C; Parvizi J; Sharkey PF; Hozack WJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):459-65. PubMed ID: 19809857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Effects of trabecular metal augments for the reconstruction of Paprosky type Ⅲ acetabulum bone defects].
    Du YQ; Zhou YG; Piao S; Wu WM; Ma HY; Gao ZS; Sun JY; Zheng C; Wang S
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 55(6):410-415. PubMed ID: 28592072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.