These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19748564)

  • 1. Fundamental frequency and speech intelligibility in background noise.
    Brown CA; Bacon SP
    Hear Res; 2010 Jul; 266(1-2):52-9. PubMed ID: 19748564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility.
    Qazi OU; van Dijk B; Moonen M; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2013 May; 299():79-87. PubMed ID: 23396271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of Spectral Contrast Enhancement on Speech-on-Speech Intelligibility and Voice Cue Sensitivity in Cochlear Implant Users.
    El Boghdady N; Langner F; Gaudrain E; Başkent D; Nogueira W
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):271-289. PubMed ID: 32925307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
    Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
    Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Formant frequency discrimination with a fine structure sound coding strategy for cochlear implants.
    Liepins R; Kaider A; Honeder C; Auinger AB; Dahm V; Riss D; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2020 Jul; 392():107970. PubMed ID: 32339775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length cues on sentence segregation by listeners with hearing loss.
    Mackersie CL; Dewey J; Guthrie LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):1006-19. PubMed ID: 21877813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech Masking in Normal and Impaired Hearing: Interactions Between Frequency Selectivity and Inherent Temporal Fluctuations in Noise.
    Oxenham AJ; Kreft HA
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():125-132. PubMed ID: 27080653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fundamental frequency discrimination and speech perception in noise in cochlear implant simulations.
    Carroll J; Zeng FG
    Hear Res; 2007 Sep; 231(1-2):42-53. PubMed ID: 17604581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the fine structure processing (FSP) strategy and the CIS strategy used in the MED-EL cochlear implant system: speech intelligibility and music sound quality.
    Magnusson L
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 21190508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of cochlear implant processing and fundamental frequency on the intelligibility of competing sentences.
    Stickney GS; Assmann PF; Chang J; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1069-78. PubMed ID: 17672654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Turn an Ear to Hear: How Hearing-Impaired Listeners Can Exploit Head Orientation to Enhance Their Speech Intelligibility in Noisy Social Settings.
    Grange JA; Culling JF; Bardsley B; Mackinney LI; Hughes SE; Backhouse SS
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518802701. PubMed ID: 30334495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contrasting benefits from contralateral implants and hearing aids in cochlear implant users.
    van Hoesel RJ
    Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 288(1-2):100-13. PubMed ID: 22226928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Influence of Cochlear Mechanical Dysfunction, Temporal Processing Deficits, and Age on the Intelligibility of Audible Speech in Noise for Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Johannesen PT; Pérez-González P; Kalluri S; Blanco JL; Lopez-Poveda EA
    Trends Hear; 2016 Sep; 20():. PubMed ID: 27604779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the relationship between auditory cognition and speech intelligibility in cochlear implant users: An ERP study.
    Finke M; Büchner A; Ruigendijk E; Meyer M; Sandmann P
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 87():169-181. PubMed ID: 27212057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individually tailored spectral-change enhancement for the hearing impaired.
    Chen J; Moore BCJ; Baer T; Wu X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Feb; 143(2):1128. PubMed ID: 29495745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.