These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

50 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19748610)

  • 1. Speech intelligibility measured with shortened versions of Callsign Acquisition Test (CAT).
    Blue MA; Ntuen C; Letowski T
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Mar; 41(2):291-4. PubMed ID: 19748610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Callsign Acquisition Test (CAT): speech intelligibility in noise.
    Rao MD; Letowski T
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 16518140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of white noise on Callsign Acquisition Test and Modified Rhyme Test scores.
    Blue-Terry M; Letowski T
    Ergonomics; 2011 Feb; 54(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 21294011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility.
    George EL; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1269-77. PubMed ID: 18681613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech intelligibility of the callsign acquisition test in a quiet environment.
    Blue M; Ntuen CA; Letowski T
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2004; 10(2):179-89. PubMed ID: 15182474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times.
    Baer T; Moore BC; Gatehouse S
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):49-72. PubMed ID: 8263829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Study of an automated procedure for a Dutch sentence test for the measurement of the speech reception threshold in noise.
    Terband H; Drullman R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3225-34. PubMed ID: 19045806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of a Danish speech intelligibility test.
    Nielsen JB; Dau T
    Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(10):729-41. PubMed ID: 19626512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bone-conducted speech: intelligibility functions and threshold force levels for spondees.
    Beattie RC; Smiarowski RA
    Am J Otol; 1981 Oct; 3(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 7304720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Swedish version of the Hearing In Noise Test (HINT) for measurement of speech recognition.
    Hällgren M; Larsby B; Arlinger S
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Apr; 45(4):227-37. PubMed ID: 16684704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implementing speech supplementation strategies: effects on intelligibility and speech rate of individuals with chronic severe dysarthria.
    Hustad KC; Jones T; Dailey S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Apr; 46(2):462-74. PubMed ID: 14700386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children.
    Yang W; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):922-33. PubMed ID: 19206869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acceptance of noise with intelligible, reversed, and unfamiliar primary discourse.
    Gordon-Hickey S; Moore RE
    Am J Audiol; 2008 Dec; 17(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 18840706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources.
    Ricketts TA; Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Haynes DS; Labadie RF
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):763-73. PubMed ID: 17086085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The concept of signal-to-noise ratio in the modulation domain and speech intelligibility.
    Dubbelboer F; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3937-46. PubMed ID: 19206818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Establishment of age-specific normative data for the canadian French version of the hearing in noise test for children.
    Vaillancourt V; Laroche C; Giguère C; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 18349705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Double hearing protection and speech intelligibility-room for improvement.
    Wagstaff AS; Woxen OJ
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2001 Apr; 72(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 11318022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.