147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19748617)
1. Evaluating the effect of the new incentive system for high-risk pressure ulcer patients on wound healing and cost-effectiveness: a cohort study.
Sanada H; Nakagami G; Mizokami Y; Minami Y; Yamamoto A; Oe M; Kaitani T; Iizaka S
Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Mar; 47(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 19748617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementing a pressure ulcer prevention program and enhancing the role of the CWOCN: impact on outcomes.
Hiser B; Rochette J; Philbin S; Lowerhouse N; Terburgh C; Pietsch C
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2006 Feb; 52(2):48-59. PubMed ID: 16464994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The cost of nurse-sensitive adverse events.
Pappas SH
J Nurs Adm; 2008 May; 38(5):230-6. PubMed ID: 18469616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A diet enriched in eicosapentanoic acid, gamma-linolenic acid and antioxidants in the prevention of new pressure ulcer formation in critically ill patients with acute lung injury: A randomized, prospective, controlled study.
Theilla M; Singer P; Cohen J; Dekeyser F
Clin Nutr; 2007 Dec; 26(6):752-7. PubMed ID: 17933438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pressure ulcers, hospital complications, and disease severity: impact on hospital costs and length of stay.
Allman RM; Goode PS; Burst N; Bartolucci AA; Thomas DR
Adv Wound Care; 1999; 12(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 10326353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing reactive air and active alternating pressure mattresses in the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers among medical ICU patients.
Malbrain M; Hendriks B; Wijnands P; Denie D; Jans A; Vanpellicom J; De Keulenaer B
J Tissue Viability; 2010 Feb; 19(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 20079647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. "Constant force technology" versus low-air-loss therapy in the treatment of pressure ulcers.
Branom R; Rappl LM
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2001 Sep; 47(9):38-46. PubMed ID: 11889743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient, wound, and treatment characteristics associated with healing in pressure ulcers.
Kramer JD; Kearney M
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2000; 13(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 11061706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of the effectiveness and cost of treatment with humid environment as compared to traditional cure. Clinical trial on primary care patients with venous leg ulcers and pressure ulcers].
Capillas Pérez R; Cabré Aguilar V; Gil Colomé AM; Gaitano García A; Torra i Bou JE
Rev Enferm; 2000 Jan; 23(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 10788945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective study evaluating the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH Tool) to assess stage II, stage III, and stage IV pressure ulcers.
Günes UY
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2009 May; 55(5):48-52. PubMed ID: 19471048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of air-fluidized therapy with other support surfaces used to treat pressure ulcers in nursing home residents.
Ochs RF; Horn SD; van Rijswijk L; Pietsch C; Smout RJ
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2005 Feb; 51(2):38-68. PubMed ID: 15699554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reducing hospital-acquired pressure ulcers with a silicone-based dermal nourishing emollient-associated skincare regimen.
Shannon RJ; Coombs M; Chakravarthy D
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2009 Oct; 22(10):461-7. PubMed ID: 20026921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy for postsurgical patients in long-term acute care.
de Leon JM; Barnes S; Nagel M; Fudge M; Lucius A; Garcia B
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2009 Mar; 22(3):122-7. PubMed ID: 19247013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early versus late initiation of negative pressure wound therapy: examining the impact on home care length of stay.
Baharestani MM; Houliston-Otto DB; Barnes S
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2008 Nov; 54(11):48-53. PubMed ID: 19037137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The value of systematic evaluation in determining the effectiveness and practical utility of a pressure-redistributing support surface.
Ward C
J Tissue Viability; 2010 Feb; 19(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 20106665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Management of venous leg ulcer by French physicians, diversity and related costs: a prospective medicoeconomic observational study].
Lévy E; Lévy P
J Mal Vasc; 2001 Feb; 26(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 11240528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of a comprehensive pressure ulcer prevention program in an extended care facility.
Regan MB; Byers PH; Mayrovitz HN
Adv Wound Care; 1995; 8(3):49, 51-2, 54-5. PubMed ID: 7795880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Economic evaluation of pressure ulcer care: a cost minimization analysis of preventive strategies.
Schuurman JP; Schoonhoven L; Defloor T; van Engelshoven I; van Ramshorst B; Buskens E
Nurs Econ; 2009; 27(6):390-400, 415. PubMed ID: 20050490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a MS specialist nurse programme.
Forbes A; While A; Mathes L; Griffiths P
Int J Nurs Stud; 2006 Nov; 43(8):985-1000. PubMed ID: 16412443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Integration of pressure ulcer treatment protocol into practice: clinical outcomes and care environment attributes.
Frantz RA; Gardner S; Specht JK; McIntire G
Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract; 2001; 5(3):112-20. PubMed ID: 11898671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
