103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19748693)
1. Target volume shape variation during irradiation of rectal cancer patients in supine position: comparison with prone position.
Nijkamp J; de Jong R; Sonke JJ; van Vliet C; Marijnen C
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Nov; 93(2):285-92. PubMed ID: 19748693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Target volume shape variation during hypo-fractionated preoperative irradiation of rectal cancer patients.
Nijkamp J; de Jong R; Sonke JJ; Remeijer P; van Vliet C; Marijnen C
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Aug; 92(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 19454365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A phase II trial for the optimisation of treatment position in the radiation therapy of prostate cancer.
O'Neill L; Armstrong J; Buckney S; Assiri M; Cannon M; Holmberg O
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 18453021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized trial of supine vs. prone positioning in patients undergoing escalated dose conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Bayley AJ; Catton CN; Haycocks T; Kelly V; Alasti H; Bristow R; Catton P; Crook J; Gospodarowicz MK; McLean M; Milosevic M; Warde P
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Jan; 70(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 15036850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeat CT assessed CTV variation and PTV margins for short- and long-course pre-operative RT of rectal cancer.
Nijkamp J; Swellengrebel M; Hollmann B; de Jong R; Marijnen C; van Vliet-Vroegindeweij C; van Triest B; van Herk M; Sonke JJ
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Mar; 102(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 22239865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study of set up variations and bowel volumes in supine versus prone positions of patients treated with external beam radiation for carcinoma rectum.
Rajeev KR; Menon SS; Beena K; Holla R; Kumar RR; Dinesh M
J Cancer Res Ther; 2014; 10(4):937-41. PubMed ID: 25579532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of prone and supine treatment positions for the pre-operative treatment of rectal cancer on organ-at-risk sparing and setup reproducibility using volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Kim A; Karotki A; Presutti J; Gonzales G; Wong S; Chu W
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Dec; 12(1):180. PubMed ID: 29202879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Internal organ motion in prostate cancer patients treated in prone and supine treatment position.
Stroom JC; Koper PC; Korevaar GA; van Os M; Janssen M; de Boer HC; Levendag PC; Heijmen BJ
Radiother Oncol; 1999 Jun; 51(3):237-48. PubMed ID: 10435819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient positioning in prostate radiotherapy: is prone better than supine?
Weber DC; Nouet P; Rouzaud M; Miralbell R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 May; 47(2):365-71. PubMed ID: 10802361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetric and toxicity comparison between prone and supine position IMRT for endometrial cancer.
Beriwal S; Jain SK; Heron DE; de Andrade RS; Lin CJ; Kim H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Feb; 67(2):485-9. PubMed ID: 17084548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of patient positioning on dose-volume histogram and normal tissue complication probability for small bowel and bladder in patients receiving pelvic irradiation: a prospective study using a 3D planning system and a radiobiological model.
Koelbl O; Richter S; Flentje M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Dec; 45(5):1193-8. PubMed ID: 10613312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The comparison of radiotherapy techniques for treatment of the prostate cancer: the three-field vs. the four-field.
Milecki P; Piotrowski T; Dymnicka M
Neoplasma; 2004; 51(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 15004663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective study of supine versus prone positioning and whole-body thermoplastic mask fixation for craniospinal radiotherapy in adult patients.
Hideghéty K; Cserháti A; Nagy Z; Varga Z; Fodor E; Vincze V; Szántó E; Maráz A; Thurzó L
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Feb; 102(2):214-8. PubMed ID: 21862161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modelling the variation in rectal dose due to inter-fraction rectal wall deformation in external beam prostate treatments.
Booth J; Zavgorodni S
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(21):5055-74. PubMed ID: 16237241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mesorectal shape variation in rectal cancer radiotherapy in prone position using a belly board.
Cox MC; Braam PM; Rütten H; van Leeuwen R; Wendling M
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jul; 19():120-125. PubMed ID: 34466668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cone beam CT evaluation of patient set-up accuracy as a QA tool.
Nielsen M; Bertelsen A; Westberg J; Jensen HR; Brink C
Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(2):271-6. PubMed ID: 18759138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Strategies to reduce the systematic error due to tumor and rectum motion in radiotherapy of prostate cancer.
Hoogeman MS; van Herk M; de Bois J; Lebesque JV
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Feb; 74(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 15734206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the ITV-margin and variables affecting bladder and mesorectal deformation during long course neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer.
Moldovan N; Moore J; Rivest R; Ahmed S; Liu J; Bashir BM; Lambert P; Guest M; Nashed M
Med Dosim; 2022 Autumn; 47(3):236-241. PubMed ID: 35437212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of treatment position, prone or supine, on dose-volume histograms for pelvic radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer.
Drzymala M; Hawkins MA; Henrys AJ; Bedford J; Norman A; Tait DM
Br J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 82(976):321-7. PubMed ID: 19188240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Persistently better treatment planning results of intensity-modulated (IMRT) over conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in prostate cancer patients with significant variation of clinical target volume and/or organs-at-risk.
Fenoglietto P; Laliberte B; Allaw A; Ailleres N; Idri K; Hay MH; Moscardo CL; Gourgou S; Dubois JB; Azria D
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 18215434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
