228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19750013)
21. Arabidopsis chromatin-associated HMGA and HMGB use different nuclear targeting signals and display highly dynamic localization within the nucleus.
Launholt D; Merkle T; Houben A; Schulz A; Grasser KD
Plant Cell; 2006 Nov; 18(11):2904-18. PubMed ID: 17114349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The osmoprotective function of the NFAT5 transcription factor in T cell development and activation.
Trama J; Go WY; Ho SN
J Immunol; 2002 Nov; 169(10):5477-88. PubMed ID: 12421923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Mitotic transcription repression in vivo in the absence of nucleosomal chromatin condensation.
Spencer CA; Kruhlak MJ; Jenkins HL; Sun X; Bazett-Jones DP
J Cell Biol; 2000 Jul; 150(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 10893252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Nucleo-cytoplasmic shuttling of the endonuclease ankyrin repeats and LEM domain-containing protein 1 (Ankle1) is mediated by canonical nuclear export- and nuclear import signals.
Zlopasa L; Brachner A; Foisner R
BMC Cell Biol; 2016 Jun; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 27245214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A putative N-terminal nuclear export sequence is sufficient for Mps1 nuclear exclusion during interphase.
Jia H; Zhang X; Wang W; Bai Y; Ling Y; Cao C; Ma RZ; Zhong H; Wang X; Xu Q
BMC Cell Biol; 2015 Feb; 16():6. PubMed ID: 25886724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A tripartite DNA-binding element, comprised of the nuclear localization signal and two AT-hook motifs, mediates the association of LEDGF/p75 with chromatin in vivo.
Turlure F; Maertens G; Rahman S; Cherepanov P; Engelman A
Nucleic Acids Res; 2006; 34(5):1653-65. PubMed ID: 16549878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Mitotic chromosome binding predicts transcription factor properties in interphase.
Raccaud M; Friman ET; Alber AB; Agarwal H; Deluz C; Kuhn T; Gebhardt JCM; Suter DM
Nat Commun; 2019 Jan; 10(1):487. PubMed ID: 30700703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Mutations in DNA-binding loop of NFAT5 transcription factor produce unique outcomes on protein-DNA binding and dynamics.
Li M; Shoemaker BA; Thangudu RR; Ferraris JD; Burg MB; Panchenko AR
J Phys Chem B; 2013 Oct; 117(42):13226-34. PubMed ID: 23734591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A nuclear export signal in the N-terminal regulatory domain of IkappaBalpha controls cytoplasmic localization of inactive NF-kappaB/IkappaBalpha complexes.
Huang TT; Kudo N; Yoshida M; Miyamoto S
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2000 Feb; 97(3):1014-9. PubMed ID: 10655476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. RBPJ, the major transcriptional effector of Notch signaling, remains associated with chromatin throughout mitosis, suggesting a role in mitotic bookmarking.
Lake RJ; Tsai PF; Choi I; Won KJ; Fan HY
PLoS Genet; 2014 Mar; 10(3):e1004204. PubMed ID: 24603501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Selective interactions between Gi alpha1 and Gi alpha3 and the GoLoco/GPR domain of RGS14 influence its dynamic subcellular localization.
Shu FJ; Ramineni S; Amyot W; Hepler JR
Cell Signal; 2007 Jan; 19(1):163-76. PubMed ID: 16870394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Herpes simplex virus tegument protein VP22 contains overlapping domains for cytoplasmic localization, microtubule interaction, and chromatin binding.
Martin A; O'Hare P; McLauchlan J; Elliott G
J Virol; 2002 May; 76(10):4961-70. PubMed ID: 11967313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Visualization of a Ran-GTP gradient in interphase and mitotic Xenopus egg extracts.
Kalab P; Weis K; Heald R
Science; 2002 Mar; 295(5564):2452-6. PubMed ID: 11923538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Nuclear receptor SHP dampens transcription function and abrogates mitotic chromatin association of PXR and ERĪ± via intermolecular interactions.
Kumar S; Vijayan R; Dash AK; Gourinath S; Tyagi RK
Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech; 2021 Mar; 1864(3):194683. PubMed ID: 33444783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Phosphatidylserine colocalizes with epichromatin in interphase nuclei and mitotic chromosomes.
Prudovsky I; Vary CP; Markaki Y; Olins AL; Olins DE
Nucleus; 2012 Mar; 3(2):200-10. PubMed ID: 22555604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Removal of cellular water prevents the reformation of the interphase nucleus.
Zieve GW; Slitzky BE
J Cell Physiol; 1986 Jul; 128(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 2941444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Phosphorylation by casein kinase 1 regulates tonicity-induced osmotic response element-binding protein/tonicity enhancer-binding protein nucleocytoplasmic trafficking.
Xu S; Wong CC; Tong EH; Chung SS; Yates JR; Yin Y; Ko BC
J Biol Chem; 2008 Jun; 283(25):17624-34. PubMed ID: 18411282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Mitotic repression of the transcriptional machinery.
Gottesfeld JM; Forbes DJ
Trends Biochem Sci; 1997 Jun; 22(6):197-202. PubMed ID: 9204705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Mitotic partitioning and selective reorganization of tissue-specific transcription factors in progeny cells.
Zaidi SK; Young DW; Pockwinse SM; Javed A; Lian JB; Stein JL; van Wijnen AJ; Stein GS
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2003 Dec; 100(25):14852-7. PubMed ID: 14657346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. How do kinases contribute to tonicity-dependent regulation of the transcription factor NFAT5?
Zhou X
World J Nephrol; 2016 Jan; 5(1):20-32. PubMed ID: 26788461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
