These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19750791)

  • 1. The interaction of cognitive load and attention-directing cues in driving.
    Lee YC; Lee JD; Boyle LN
    Hum Factors; 2009 Jun; 51(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 19750791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual attention in driving: the effects of cognitive load and visual disruption.
    Lee YC; Lee JD; Boyle LN
    Hum Factors; 2007 Aug; 49(4):721-33. PubMed ID: 17702223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of auditory cues in drivers' distraction.
    Lin CY; Hsu CC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Oct; 111(2):503-16. PubMed ID: 21162452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
    Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Young drivers' perception of adult and child pedestrians in potential street-crossing situations.
    Ābele L; Haustein S; Møller M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():263-268. PubMed ID: 29625692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-modal warnings for orienting attention in older drivers with and without attention impairments.
    Lees MN; Cosman J; Lee JD; Vecera SP; Dawson JD; Rizzo M
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jul; 43(4):768-76. PubMed ID: 22204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The perception of pedestrians from the perspective of elderly experienced and experienced drivers.
    Bromberg S; Oron-Gilad T; Ronen A; Borowsky A; Parmet Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Jan; 44(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 22062336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitivity of subjective questionnaires to cognitive loading while driving with navigation aids: a pilot study.
    Smyth CC
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2007 May; 78(5 Suppl):B39-50. PubMed ID: 17547303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neurocognitive Correlates of Young Drivers' Performance in a Driving Simulator.
    Guinosso SA; Johnson SB; Schultheis MT; Graefe AC; Bishai DM
    J Adolesc Health; 2016 Apr; 58(4):467-473. PubMed ID: 27013272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age differences in cognitive and psychomotor abilities and simulated driving.
    Shanmugaratnam S; Kass SJ; Arruda JE
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 May; 42(3):802-8. PubMed ID: 20380906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Drivers' Cue Utilization Predicts Cognitive Resource Consumption During a Simulated Driving Scenario.
    Sturman D; Wiggins MW
    Hum Factors; 2021 May; 63(3):402-414. PubMed ID: 31721607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Load theory behind the wheel; perceptual and cognitive load effects.
    Murphy G; Greene CM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Sep; 71(3):191-202. PubMed ID: 28604027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Classifying Drivers' Cognitive Load Using EEG Signals.
    Barua S; Ahmed MU; Begum S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 237():99-106. PubMed ID: 28479551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of in-vehicle warning information displays with or without spatial compatibility on driving behaviors and response performance.
    Liu YC; Jhuang JW
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jul; 43(4):679-86. PubMed ID: 22103964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effects of Cognitive and Visual Workload on Peripheral Detection in the Detection Response Task.
    van Winsum W
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):855-869. PubMed ID: 29791188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigating the influence of working memory capacity when driving behavior is combined with cognitive load: An LCT study of young novice drivers.
    Ross V; Jongen EM; Wang W; Brijs T; Brijs K; Ruiter RA; Wets G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():377-87. PubMed ID: 23915472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving.
    Zeeb K; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Jul; 92():230-9. PubMed ID: 27107472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of working memory load on electrophysiological markers of visuospatial orienting in a spatial cueing task simulating a traffic situation.
    Vossen AY; Ross V; Jongen EM; Ruiter RA; Smulders FT
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Feb; 53(2):237-51. PubMed ID: 26524126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of brief visual interruption tasks on drivers' ability to resume their visual search for a pre-cued hazard.
    Borowsky A; Horrey WJ; Liang Y; Garabet A; Simmons L; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Aug; 93():207-216. PubMed ID: 27209155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional networks functioning, age, and attentional lapses while driving.
    López-Ramón MF; Castro C; Roca J; Ledesma R; Lupiañez J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Oct; 12(5):518-28. PubMed ID: 21972863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.