BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19750791)

  • 1. The interaction of cognitive load and attention-directing cues in driving.
    Lee YC; Lee JD; Boyle LN
    Hum Factors; 2009 Jun; 51(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 19750791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual attention in driving: the effects of cognitive load and visual disruption.
    Lee YC; Lee JD; Boyle LN
    Hum Factors; 2007 Aug; 49(4):721-33. PubMed ID: 17702223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of auditory cues in drivers' distraction.
    Lin CY; Hsu CC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Oct; 111(2):503-16. PubMed ID: 21162452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
    Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Young drivers' perception of adult and child pedestrians in potential street-crossing situations.
    Ābele L; Haustein S; Møller M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():263-268. PubMed ID: 29625692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-modal warnings for orienting attention in older drivers with and without attention impairments.
    Lees MN; Cosman J; Lee JD; Vecera SP; Dawson JD; Rizzo M
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jul; 43(4):768-76. PubMed ID: 22204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The perception of pedestrians from the perspective of elderly experienced and experienced drivers.
    Bromberg S; Oron-Gilad T; Ronen A; Borowsky A; Parmet Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Jan; 44(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 22062336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitivity of subjective questionnaires to cognitive loading while driving with navigation aids: a pilot study.
    Smyth CC
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2007 May; 78(5 Suppl):B39-50. PubMed ID: 17547303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neurocognitive Correlates of Young Drivers' Performance in a Driving Simulator.
    Guinosso SA; Johnson SB; Schultheis MT; Graefe AC; Bishai DM
    J Adolesc Health; 2016 Apr; 58(4):467-473. PubMed ID: 27013272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age differences in cognitive and psychomotor abilities and simulated driving.
    Shanmugaratnam S; Kass SJ; Arruda JE
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 May; 42(3):802-8. PubMed ID: 20380906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Drivers' Cue Utilization Predicts Cognitive Resource Consumption During a Simulated Driving Scenario.
    Sturman D; Wiggins MW
    Hum Factors; 2021 May; 63(3):402-414. PubMed ID: 31721607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Load theory behind the wheel; perceptual and cognitive load effects.
    Murphy G; Greene CM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Sep; 71(3):191-202. PubMed ID: 28604027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Classifying Drivers' Cognitive Load Using EEG Signals.
    Barua S; Ahmed MU; Begum S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 237():99-106. PubMed ID: 28479551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of in-vehicle warning information displays with or without spatial compatibility on driving behaviors and response performance.
    Liu YC; Jhuang JW
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jul; 43(4):679-86. PubMed ID: 22103964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effects of Cognitive and Visual Workload on Peripheral Detection in the Detection Response Task.
    van Winsum W
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):855-869. PubMed ID: 29791188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigating the influence of working memory capacity when driving behavior is combined with cognitive load: An LCT study of young novice drivers.
    Ross V; Jongen EM; Wang W; Brijs T; Brijs K; Ruiter RA; Wets G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():377-87. PubMed ID: 23915472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving.
    Zeeb K; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Jul; 92():230-9. PubMed ID: 27107472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of working memory load on electrophysiological markers of visuospatial orienting in a spatial cueing task simulating a traffic situation.
    Vossen AY; Ross V; Jongen EM; Ruiter RA; Smulders FT
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Feb; 53(2):237-51. PubMed ID: 26524126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of brief visual interruption tasks on drivers' ability to resume their visual search for a pre-cued hazard.
    Borowsky A; Horrey WJ; Liang Y; Garabet A; Simmons L; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Aug; 93():207-216. PubMed ID: 27209155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional networks functioning, age, and attentional lapses while driving.
    López-Ramón MF; Castro C; Roca J; Ledesma R; Lupiañez J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Oct; 12(5):518-28. PubMed ID: 21972863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.