These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19750792)

  • 1. Trust and reliance on an automated combat identification system.
    Wang L; Jamieson GA; Hollands JG
    Hum Factors; 2009 Jun; 51(3):281-91. PubMed ID: 19750792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Beyond identity: incorporating system reliability information into an automated combat identification system.
    Neyedli HF; Hollands JG; Jamieson GA
    Hum Factors; 2011 Aug; 53(4):338-55. PubMed ID: 21901932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems.
    Madhavan P; Wiegmann DA
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):773-85. PubMed ID: 17915596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human-human reliance in the context of automation.
    Lyons JB; Stokes CK
    Hum Factors; 2012 Feb; 54(1):112-21. PubMed ID: 22409106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trust and the Compliance-Reliance Paradigm: The Effects of Risk, Error Bias, and Reliability on Trust and Dependence.
    Chancey ET; Bliss JP; Yamani Y; Handley HAH
    Hum Factors; 2017 May; 59(3):333-345. PubMed ID: 28430544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Who's the real expert here? Pedigree's unique bias on trust between human and automated advisers.
    Pearson CJ; Geden M; Mayhorn CB
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Nov; 81():102907. PubMed ID: 31422272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Not All Information Is Equal: Effects of Disclosing Different Types of Likelihood Information on Trust, Compliance and Reliance, and Task Performance in Human-Automation Teaming.
    Du N; Huang KY; Yang XJ
    Hum Factors; 2020 Sep; 62(6):987-1001. PubMed ID: 31348863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Examining single- and multiple-process theories of trust in automation.
    Rice S
    J Gen Psychol; 2009 Jul; 136(3):303-19. PubMed ID: 19650524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The reliability and transparency bases of trust in human-swarm interaction: principles and implications.
    Hussein A; Elsawah S; Abbass HA
    Ergonomics; 2020 Sep; 63(9):1116-1132. PubMed ID: 32370651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Affective processes in human-automation interactions.
    Merritt SM
    Hum Factors; 2011 Aug; 53(4):356-70. PubMed ID: 21901933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trust Mediating Reliability-Reliance Relationship in Supervisory Control of Human-Swarm Interactions.
    Hussein A; Elsawah S; Abbass HA
    Hum Factors; 2020 Dec; 62(8):1237-1248. PubMed ID: 31590574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Effect of Informing Participants of the Response Bias of an Automated Target Recognition System on Trust and Reliance Behavior.
    Knocton S; Hunter A; Connors W; Dithurbide L; Neyedli HF
    Hum Factors; 2023 Mar; 65(2):189-199. PubMed ID: 34078167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Target Detection and Identification Performance Using an Automatic Target Detection System.
    Reiner AJ; Hollands JG; Jamieson GA
    Hum Factors; 2017 Mar; 59(2):242-258. PubMed ID: 27738280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of imperfect automation on decision making in a simulated command and control task.
    Rovira E; McGarry K; Parasuraman R
    Hum Factors; 2007 Feb; 49(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 17315845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Displaying contextual information reduces the costs of imperfect decision automation in rapid retasking of ISR assets.
    Rovira E; Cross A; Leitch E; Bonaceto C
    Hum Factors; 2014 Sep; 56(6):1036-49. PubMed ID: 25277015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Team performance in networked supervisory control of unmanned air vehicles: effects of automation, working memory, and communication content.
    McKendrick R; Shaw T; de Visser E; Saqer H; Kidwell B; Parasuraman R
    Hum Factors; 2014 May; 56(3):463-75. PubMed ID: 24930169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complacency and bias in human use of automation: an attentional integration.
    Parasuraman R; Manzey DH
    Hum Factors; 2010 Jun; 52(3):381-410. PubMed ID: 21077562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving.
    Körber M; Baseler E; Bengler K
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jan; 66():18-31. PubMed ID: 28958427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automation failures on tasks easily performed by operators undermine trust in automated aids.
    Madhavan P; Wiegmann DA; Lacson FC
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(2):241-56. PubMed ID: 16884046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring Individual Differences in the Perfect Automation Schema.
    Merritt SM; Unnerstall JL; Lee D; Huber K
    Hum Factors; 2015 Aug; 57(5):740-53. PubMed ID: 25882304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.