These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19751022)

  • 41. [Evaluation of acetabular cup placement precision in Stryker computer-assisted navigated total hip arthroplasty].
    Shang P; Bai X; Shi D
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2012 Sep; 36(5):313-6. PubMed ID: 23289330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Error in acetabular socket alignment due to the thick anterior pelvic soft tissues.
    Lee YS; Yoon TR
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Aug; 23(5):699-706. PubMed ID: 18534380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Validation of the femoral component placement during hip resurfacing: a comparison between the conventional jig, patient-specific template, and CT-based navigation.
    Kitada M; Sakai T; Murase T; Hanada T; Nakamura N; Sugano N
    Int J Med Robot; 2013 Jun; 9(2):223-9. PubMed ID: 23460526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. An overview of economic issues in computer-assisted total joint arthroplasty.
    Beringer DC; Patel JJ; Bozic KJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Oct; 463():26-30. PubMed ID: 17960672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Robotic systems in orthopedic surgery for rheumatoid arthritis].
    Murata N; Nakamura N; Kakimoto A
    Nihon Rinsho; 2005 Jan; 63 Suppl 1():691-5. PubMed ID: 15799444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Analysis of key vision position technologies in robot assisted surgical system for total knee replacement].
    Zhao Z; Liu Y; Wu X; Liu H
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Feb; 25(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 18435251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Tailor-made surgical guide based on rapid prototyping technique for cup insertion in total hip arthroplasty.
    Hananouchi T; Saito M; Koyama T; Hagio K; Murase T; Sugano N; Yoshikawa H
    Int J Med Robot; 2009 Jun; 5(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 19248055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Computer-assisted hip resurfacing surgery using the acrobot navigation system.
    Barrett AR; Davies BL; Gomes MP; Harris SJ; Henckel J; Jakopec M; Kannan V; Rodriguez y Baena FM; Cobb JP
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2007 Oct; 221(7):773-85. PubMed ID: 18019464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Monitoring femoral component installation using vibration testing.
    Giardini S; Cornwell P; Meneghini RM
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2005; 41():13-8. PubMed ID: 15850075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The statistical relationship between varus deformity, surgeon's experience, BMI and tourniquet time for computer assisted total knee replacements.
    Sampath SA; Voon SH; Sangster M; Davies H
    Knee; 2009 Mar; 16(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 19013071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Arthrodesis of the knee using computer navigation in failed total knee arthroplasty.
    Jung KA; Lee SC; Song MB
    Orthopedics; 2009 Mar; 32(3):209. PubMed ID: 19309051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The current status and future prospects of computer-assisted hip surgery.
    Inaba Y; Kobayashi N; Ike H; Kubota S; Saito T
    J Orthop Sci; 2016 Mar; 21(2):107-15. PubMed ID: 26850921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Intraoperative 3D reconstruction of the PMMA plug for computer-assisted revision of total hip arthroplasty based on 2D X-ray images].
    Ohnsorge JA; de la Fuente M; Jetzki S; Wirtz DC; Radermacher K
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(5):531-9. PubMed ID: 14551839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Total hip arthroplasty in acetabular protrusio.
    Ries MD
    Orthopedics; 2009 Sep; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 19751015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The concept and feasibility of EXPERT: intelligent armrest using robotics technology.
    Goto T; Hongo K; Yako T; Hara Y; Okamoto J; Toyoda K; Fujie MG; Iseki H
    Neurosurgery; 2013 Jan; 72 Suppl 1():39-42. PubMed ID: 23254811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Application of surgical navigation to total hip arthroplasty.
    Ecker TM; Murphy SB
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2007 Oct; 221(7):699-712. PubMed ID: 18019458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Motorization of a surgical microscope for intra-operative navigation and intuitive control.
    Finke M; Schweikard A
    Int J Med Robot; 2010 Sep; 6(3):269-80. PubMed ID: 20812267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Using robots in hip prosthesis implantation. Precision with the wrong concept?].
    Burgkart R; Mittelmeier W; Steinhauser E; Gradinger R
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2001 Apr; 143(15):36-7. PubMed ID: 11349316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty.
    Banerjee S; Cherian JJ; Elmallah RK; Pierce TP; Jauregui JJ; Mont MA
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2016; 13(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 26592900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Accuracy of imageless stem navigation during simulated total hip arthroplasty.
    Renkawitz T; Sendtner E; Grifka J; Kalteis T
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Dec; 79(6):785-8. PubMed ID: 19085495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.