These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19751071)

  • 1. Evaluating science arguments: evidence, uncertainty, and argument strength.
    Corner A; Hahn U
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Sep; 15(3):199-212. PubMed ID: 19751071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The rationality of informal argumentation: a Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies.
    Hahn U; Oaksford M
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):704-32. PubMed ID: 17638503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of repetition-induced familiarity on agreement with weak and strong arguments.
    Moons WG; Mackie DM; Garcia-Marques T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jan; 96(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 19210062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of DTC advertisement content on belief tenacity: a study of appeals and argument types.
    Jalnawala N; Wilkin NE
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Mar; 3(1):28-46. PubMed ID: 17350556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of causality in judgment under uncertainty.
    Krynski TR; Tenenbaum JB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):430-50. PubMed ID: 17696692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The macrostructure of informal arguments: a proposed model and analysis.
    Ricco RB
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Aug; 56(6):1021-51. PubMed ID: 12881169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating arguments during instigations of defence motivation and accuracy motivation.
    Liu CH
    Br J Psychol; 2017 May; 108(2):296-317. PubMed ID: 26973222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relevance framework for category-based induction: Evidence from garden-path arguments.
    Feeney A; Coley JD; Crisp A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):906-19. PubMed ID: 20565209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Seeing is believing: the effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning.
    McCabe DP; Castel AD
    Cognition; 2008 Apr; 107(1):343-52. PubMed ID: 17803985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unquestioned answers or unanswered questions: beliefs about science guide responses to uncertainty in climate change risk communication.
    Rabinovich A; Morton TA
    Risk Anal; 2012 Jun; 32(6):992-1002. PubMed ID: 22324775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discounting testimony with the argument ad hominem and a Bayesian congruent prior model.
    Bhatia JS; Oaksford M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1548-59. PubMed ID: 26147667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early sensitivity to arguments: how preschoolers weight circular arguments.
    Mercier H; Bernard S; Clément F
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Sep; 125():102-9. PubMed ID: 24485755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automatic and controlled components of judgment and decision making.
    Ferreira MB; Garcia-Marques L; Sherman SJ; Sherman JW
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Nov; 91(5):797-813. PubMed ID: 17059302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of integrating instrumental and affective arguments in rhetorical and testimonial health messages.
    Keer M; van den Putte B; de Wit J; Neijens P
    J Health Commun; 2013; 18(9):1148-61. PubMed ID: 23659225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Deconfounding distance effects in judgments of moral obligation.
    Nagel J; Waldmann MR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):237-52. PubMed ID: 22686846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical judgement in the interpretation of evidence: A Bayesian approach.
    Harbison J
    J Clin Nurs; 2006 Dec; 15(12):1489-97. PubMed ID: 17118071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discrete emotions and persuasion: the role of emotion-induced expectancies.
    DeSteno D; Petty RE; Rucker DD; Wegener DT; Braverman J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Jan; 86(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 14717627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of arguments in research reports].
    Botes A
    Curationis; 1999 Jun; 22(2):10-9. PubMed ID: 11040614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptions of entitativity and attitude change.
    Rydell RJ; McConnell AR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Jan; 31(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 15574665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of minority/majority source status on attitude certainty: a matching perspective.
    Tormala ZL; Desensi VL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jan; 35(1):114-25. PubMed ID: 19106081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.