These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19751072)

  • 1. Bringing meaning to numbers: the impact of evaluative categories on decisions.
    Peters E; Dieckmann NF; Västfjäll D; Mertz CK; Slovic P; Hibbard JH
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Sep; 15(3):213-27. PubMed ID: 19751072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Numeracy and decision making.
    Peters E; Västfjäll D; Slovic P; Mertz CK; Mazzocco K; Dickert S
    Psychol Sci; 2006 May; 17(5):407-13. PubMed ID: 16683928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Numbers matter to informed patient choices: a randomized design across age and numeracy levels.
    Peters E; Hart PS; Tusler M; Fraenkel L
    Med Decis Making; 2014 May; 34(4):430-42. PubMed ID: 24246563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lessons from the evolution of 401(k) retirement plans for increased consumerism in health care: an application of behavioral research.
    DiCenzo J; Fronstin P
    EBRI Issue Brief; 2008 Aug; (320):1, 3-26. PubMed ID: 18724525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk approximation in decision making: approximative numeric abilities predict advantageous decisions under objective risk.
    Mueller SM; Schiebener J; Delazer M; Brand M
    Cogn Process; 2018 Aug; 19(3):297-315. PubMed ID: 29357078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Normal aging affects decisions under ambiguity, but not decisions under risk.
    Zamarian L; Sinz H; Bonatti E; Gamboz N; Delazer M
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Sep; 22(5):645-57. PubMed ID: 18763884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The gut chooses faster than the mind: a latency advantage of affective over cognitive decisions.
    Saunders TS; Buehner MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(2):381-8. PubMed ID: 22950824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of ambiguity and risk on decision making in mild Alzheimer's disease.
    Sinz H; Zamarian L; Benke T; Wenning GK; Delazer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2043-55. PubMed ID: 18339408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Not all Anchors Weigh Equally.
    Greenstein M; Velazquez A
    Exp Psychol; 2017 Nov; 64(6):398-405. PubMed ID: 29268677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. To push or not to push? Affective influences on moral judgment depend on decision frame.
    Pastötter B; Gleixner S; Neuhauser T; Bäuml KH
    Cognition; 2013 Mar; 126(3):373-7. PubMed ID: 23280150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prefrontal mechanisms in preference and non-preference-based judgments.
    Foo JC; Haji T; Sakai K
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jul; 95():151-61. PubMed ID: 24662580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Single-process versus multiple-strategy models of decision making: evidence from an information intrusion paradigm.
    Söllner A; Bröder A; Glöckner A; Betsch T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Feb; 146():84-96. PubMed ID: 24441266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ignorance- versus evidence-based decision making: a decision time analysis of the recognition heuristic.
    Hilbig BE; Pohl RF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1296-305. PubMed ID: 19686022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiple numeric competencies: When a number is not just a number.
    Peters E; Bjalkebring P
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2015 May; 108(5):802-22. PubMed ID: 25285966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How short- and long-run aspirations impact search and choice in decisions from experience.
    Wulff DU; Hills TT; Hertwig R
    Cognition; 2015 Nov; 144():29-37. PubMed ID: 26218515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought.
    Clore GL; Huntsinger JR
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Sep; 11(9):393-9. PubMed ID: 17698405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How bad becomes good: A neurocomputational model of affect-informed choice.
    Roberts ID; HajiHosseini A; Hutcherson CA
    Emotion; 2024 Oct; 24(7):1737-1752. PubMed ID: 38900558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trait as default: extraversion, subjective well-being, and the distinction between neutral and positive events.
    Robinson MD; Solberg EC; Vargas PT; Tamir M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2003 Sep; 85(3):517-27. PubMed ID: 14498787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative judgments with missing information: a regression and process tracing analysis.
    Körner C; Gertzen H; Bettinger C; Albert D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 May; 125(1):66-84. PubMed ID: 16949538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Take-the-best and the influence of decision-inconsistent attributes on decision confidence and choices in memory-based decisions.
    Dummel S; Rummel J
    Memory; 2016 Nov; 24(10):1435-43. PubMed ID: 26642913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.