These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19751093)

  • 1. (Mis-) Direction of effect sizes.
    Knittle KP
    Health Psychol; 2009 Sep; 28(5):647; author reply 647-8. PubMed ID: 19751093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deficits and remedy of the standard random effects methods in meta-analysis.
    Ziegler S; Koch A; Victor N
    Methods Inf Med; 2001 May; 40(2):148-55. PubMed ID: 11424301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comments on 'An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings' by JPA loannidis and TA Trikalinos.
    Johnson V; Yuan Y
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(3):254-5; discussion 256-7. PubMed ID: 17715250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical trial quality needs to be improved to facilitate metaanalyses.
    Chalmers TC
    Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1993 Sep; Doc No 89():[1541 words; 14 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8306015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Structural time series models in medicine.
    Harvey A; Koopman SJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1996 Mar; 5(1):23-49. PubMed ID: 8743077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incorporating data from various trial designs into a mixed treatment comparison model.
    Schmitz S; Adams R; Walsh C
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(17):2935-49. PubMed ID: 23440610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pitfalls in meta-analysis of observational studies: lessons from a systematic review of the risks of stenting for intracranial atherosclerosis.
    Trinquart L; Touzé E
    Stroke; 2009 Oct; 40(10):e586-7; author reply e590. PubMed ID: 19745174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Letter to the editor: a comment on Lynch et al. (2009).
    Lincoln TM
    Psychol Med; 2010 May; 40(5):877-80. PubMed ID: 19917145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcome reporting bias in clinical trials.
    Esposito E; Cipriani A; Barbui C
    Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc; 2009; 18(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 19378694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Practical and updated guidelines on performing meta-analyses of non-randomized studies in interventional cardiology.
    Navarese EP; Koziński M; Pafundi T; Andreotti F; Buffon A; Servi SD; Kubica J
    Cardiol J; 2011; 18(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 21305479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Interpretation of clinical studies].
    Jahrmäker H
    Med Klin (Munich); 1995 Jan; 90(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 7885305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combined test procedures in the meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.
    Knapp G; Hartung J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():34-8. PubMed ID: 11187570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bias in meta-analysis and funnel plot asymmetry.
    Biljana M; Jelena M; Branislav J; Milorad R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 68():323-8. PubMed ID: 10724898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials: an empirical example.
    Doi SA; Barendregt JJ; Mozurkewich EL
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Mar; 32(2):288-98. PubMed ID: 21147265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Statistical tricks. Can a proband be minus 2 years old?].
    Butenandt O
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2006 Feb; 148(5):13. PubMed ID: 16518930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Five easy pieces on evidence-based medicine (4).
    Kalso E; Edwards J; McQuay HJ; Moore RA
    Eur J Pain; 2002; 6(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 11888232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Credibility of subgroup findings in clinical trials and meta-analyses.
    Myles P; Kasza J; Turner T
    Br J Anaesth; 2021 Jul; 127(1):11-14. PubMed ID: 33992396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Statistics--lying, but correctly!].
    Bias R
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1996; 146(4):87-8. PubMed ID: 8650945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meta-analysis of small trials: proceed with caution.
    Farkouh ME; Fuster V
    Nat Clin Pract Nephrol; 2008 Mar; 4(3):115. PubMed ID: 18326067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Statistics--lying, but properly!].
    Bias R
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1996; 146(8):178-80. PubMed ID: 8767404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.