455 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19751776)
1. Sequence effects in the Go/NoGo task: inhibition and facilitation.
Thomas SJ; Gonsalvez CJ; Johnstone SJ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Dec; 74(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 19751776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Response inhibition and interference control in children with AD/HD: a visual ERP investigation.
Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ; Markovska V; Dimoska A; Clarke AR
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 May; 72(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 19095016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sequence effects support the conflict theory of N2 and P3 in the Go/NoGo task.
Smith JL; Smith EA; Provost AL; Heathcote A
Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar; 75(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 19951723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood: a Go/Nogo ERP study.
Jonkman LM
Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1097(1):181-93. PubMed ID: 16729977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A study on the neural mechanism of inhibition of return by the event-related potential in the Go/NoGo task.
Tian Y; Yao D
Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 18524452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks.
Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22906814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Event-related potentials for response inhibition in Parkinson's disease.
Bokura H; Yamaguchi S; Kobayashi S
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(6):967-75. PubMed ID: 15716167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of fetal alcohol syndrome on response execution and inhibition: an event-related potential study.
Burden MJ; Andrew C; Saint-Amour D; Meintjes EM; Molteno CD; Hoyme HE; Robinson LK; Khaole N; Nelson CA; Jacobson JL; Jacobson SW
Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2009 Nov; 33(11):1994-2004. PubMed ID: 19719791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition.
Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 16214250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Varying task difficulty in the Go/Nogo task: the effects of inhibitory control, arousal, and perceived effort on ERP components.
Benikos N; Johnstone SJ; Roodenrys SJ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):262-72. PubMed ID: 22902315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Altered effect of preceding response execution on inhibitory processing in children with AD/HD: An ERP study.
Inoue Y; Inagaki M; Gunji A; Furushima W; Okada H; Sasaki H; Omori T; Takeichi H; Kaga M
Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Aug; 77(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 20483364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Source analysis of the N2 in a cued Go/NoGo task.
Bekker EM; Kenemans JL; Verbaten MN
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 22(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 15653295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.
Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dysfunctional response preparation and inhibition during a visual Go/No-go task in children with two subtypes of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Johnstone SJ; Clarke AR
Psychiatry Res; 2009 Apr; 166(2-3):223-37. PubMed ID: 19286266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Age-related differences in processing irrelevant information: evidence from event-related potentials.
Vallesi A; Stuss DT; McIntosh AR; Picton TW
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(2):577-86. PubMed ID: 19022270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prestimulus alpha and beta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task.
De Blasio FM; Barry RJ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 23643562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mental fatigue and impaired response processes: event-related brain potentials in a Go/NoGo task.
Kato Y; Endo H; Kizuka T
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 May; 72(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 19135100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The relationship of N2 and P3 to inhibitory processing of social drinkers in a Go/NoGo task.
Oddy BW; Barry RJ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Jun; 72(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 19250950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Caffeine effects on ERPs and performance in an auditory Go/NoGo task.
Barry RJ; Johnstone SJ; Clarke AR; Rushby JA; Brown CR; McKenzie DN
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec; 118(12):2692-9. PubMed ID: 17905651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
