216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19752171)
1. Zooming method (x 2.0) of digital mammography vs digital magnification view (x 1.8) in full-field digital mammography for the diagnosis of microcalcifications.
Kim MJ; Youk JH; Kang DR; Choi SH; Kwak JY; Son EJ; Kim EK
Br J Radiol; 2010 Jun; 83(990):486-92. PubMed ID: 19752171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization of microcalcification: can digital monitor zooming replace magnification mammography in full-field digital mammography?
Kim MJ; Kim EK; Kwak JY; Son EJ; Youk JH; Choi SH; Han M; Oh KK
Eur Radiol; 2009 Feb; 19(2):310-7. PubMed ID: 18677486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison between electronic zoom and geometric magnification of clusters of microcalcifications on digital mammography].
Moraux-Wallyn M; Chaveron C; Bachelle F; Taieb S; Ceugnart L
J Radiol; 2010 Sep; 91(9 Pt 1):879-83. PubMed ID: 20814375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Digital full field mammography: comparison between radiographic direct magnification and digital monitor zooming].
Fischer U; Baum F; Obenauer S; Funke M; Hermann KP; Grabbe E
Radiologe; 2002 Apr; 42(4):261-4. PubMed ID: 12063732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of magnification views on the characterization of microcalcifications in digital mammography.
Fallenberg EM; Dimitrijevic L; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Kettritz U; Poellinger A; Bick U; Winzer KJ; Engelken F; Renz DM
Rofo; 2014 Mar; 186(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 23999780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital zoom of the full-field digital mammogram versus magnification mammography: a systematic review.
Øynes M; Strøm B; Tveito B; Hafslund B
Eur Radiol; 2020 Aug; 30(8):4223-4233. PubMed ID: 32222798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microcalcifications Detected at Screening Mammography: Synthetic Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography.
Lai YC; Ray KM; Lee AY; Hayward JH; Freimanis RI; Lobach IV; Joe BN
Radiology; 2018 Dec; 289(3):630-638. PubMed ID: 30277445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantification of Al-equivalent thickness of just visible microcalcifications in full field digital mammograms.
Carton AK; Bosmans H; Vandenbroucke D; Souverijns G; Van Ongeval C; Dragusin O; Marchal G
Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2165-76. PubMed ID: 15305471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conspicuity of microcalcifications on digital screening mammograms using varying degrees of monitor zooming.
Haygood TM; Arribas E; Brennan PC; Atkinson EN; Herndon M; Dieber J; Geiser W; Santiago L; Mills CM; Davis P; Adrada B; Carkaci S; Stephens TW; Whitman GJ
Acad Radiol; 2009 Dec; 16(12):1509-17. PubMed ID: 19896068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of 2D Synthetic Mammography Versus Digital Mammography in the Detection of Microcalcifications at Screening.
Dodelzon K; Simon K; Dou E; Levy AD; Michaels AY; Askin G; Katzen JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jun; 214(6):1436-1444. PubMed ID: 32255687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative comparison of clustered microcalcifications in for-presentation and for-processing mammograms in full-field digital mammography.
Wang J; Nishikawa RM; Yang Y
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3726-3738. PubMed ID: 28477395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiple Angulated Mammography Reconstructions in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for the Diagnosis of Microcalcifications - Added Value to Standard Stack Reconstructions and Synthesized Mammography.
Neubauer J; Neubauer C; Wicklein J; Mertelmeier T; Windfuhr-Blum M; Langer M
Rofo; 2018 May; 190(5):433-440. PubMed ID: 29390228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between image quality in electronic zoom and geometric magnification in digital mammography.
Alkhalifah KH; Brindhaban A; Asbeutah AM
J Xray Sci Technol; 2016 Oct; 24(5):681-689. PubMed ID: 27341625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of masses and calcifications by soft-copy reading: comparison of two postprocessing algorithms for full-field digital mammography.
Uematsu T
Jpn J Radiol; 2009 May; 27(4):168-75. PubMed ID: 19499307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of potential microcalcification clusters using multivendor for-presentation digital mammograms for short-term breast cancer risk estimation.
Alsheh Ali M; Eriksson M; Czene K; Hall P; Humphreys K
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1938-1946. PubMed ID: 30801718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer aided system for segmentation and visualization of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
Reljin B; Milosević Z; Stojić T; Reljin I
Folia Histochem Cytobiol; 2009 Jan; 47(3):525-32. PubMed ID: 20164042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnification mammography: a comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications.
Hermann KP; Obenauer S; Funke M; Grabbe EH
Eur Radiol; 2002 Sep; 12(9):2188-91. PubMed ID: 12195468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the Detection Rate of Simulated Microcalcifications in Full-Field Digital Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Synthetically Reconstructed 2-Dimensional Images Performed With 2 Different Digital X-ray Mammography Systems.
Peters S; Hellmich M; Stork A; Kemper J; Grinstein O; Püsken M; Stahlhut L; Kinner S; Maintz D; Krug KB
Invest Radiol; 2017 Apr; 52(4):206-215. PubMed ID: 27861206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
