These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19752359)

  • 1. The complete supraannular concept: in vivo hemodynamics of bovine and porcine aortic bioprostheses.
    Ruzicka DJ; Hettich I; Hutter A; Bleiziffer S; Badiu CC; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R; Eichinger WB
    Circulation; 2009 Sep; 120(11 Suppl):S139-45. PubMed ID: 19752359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
    Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hemodynamic comparison of bioprostheses for complete supra-annular position in patients with small aortic annulus.
    Botzenhardt F; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Guenzinger R; Wagner IM; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Jun; 45(12):2054-60. PubMed ID: 15963409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hemodynamic performance and incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch of the complete supraannular perimount magna bioprosthesis in the aortic position.
    Botzenhardt F; Eichinger WB; Guenzinger R; Bleiziffer S; Wagner I; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Aug; 53(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 16037868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hemodynamic performance of the new St. Jude Medical Epic Supra porcine bioprosthesis in comparison to the Medtronic Mosaic on the basis of patient annulus diameter.
    Ruzicka DJ; Eichinger WB; Hettich IM; Bleiziffer S; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jul; 17(4):426-33; discussion 434. PubMed ID: 18751473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of prosthesis-patient mismatch on diastolic heart failure after aortic valve replacement.
    Nozohoor S; Nilsson J; Lührs C; Roijer A; Sjögren J
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Apr; 85(4):1310-7. PubMed ID: 18355517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis.
    Bleiziffer S; Eichinger WB; Wagner I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
    Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effective orifice area/patient aortic annulus area ratio: a better way to compare different bioprostheses? A prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position.
    Eichinger WB; Botzenhardt F; Guenzinger R; Bleiziffer S; Keithahn A; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):382-8; discussion 388-9. PubMed ID: 15222284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hemodynamic evaluation of the Sorin Soprano bioprosthesis in the completely supra-annular aortic position.
    Eichinger WB; Botzenhardt F; Wagner I; Bleiziffer S; Ruzicka DJ; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):822-7. PubMed ID: 16359065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aortic annulus diameter and valve design each determine the valve size implanted.
    von Oppell UO; Segadal L; Busund R; Johnston GG; Dimitrakakis G; Masani N; Lung TH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2012 Sep; 21(5):591-8. PubMed ID: 23167223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Results of a propensity score-matched comparison of the Perimount Magna and Mosaic Ultra aortic valve prostheses.
    Wendt D; Buck T; Jánosi RA; Thielmann M; Pul U; Neuhäuser M; Piotrowski JA; Massoudy P; Kamler M; Erbel R; Jakob H
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2009 Nov; 18(6):703-11; discussion 712. PubMed ID: 20099721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna valve versus Medtronic Hancock II: a matched hemodynamic comparison.
    Borger MA; Nette AF; Maganti M; Feindel CM
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Jun; 83(6):2054-8. PubMed ID: 17532395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vivo hemodynamic comparison of porcine and pericardial valves.
    Cosgrove DM; Lytle BW; Gill CC; Golding LA; Stewart RW; Loop FD; Williams GW
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Mar; 89(3):358-68. PubMed ID: 3974271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective randomized comparison of the Medtronic Advantage Supra and St Jude Medical Regent mechanical heart valves in the aortic position: is there an additional benefit of supra-annular valve positioning?
    Guenzinger R; Eichinger WB; Hettich I; Bleiziffer S; Ruzicka D; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Aug; 136(2):462-71. PubMed ID: 18692658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna bioprosthesis: a stented valve with stentless performance?
    Totaro P; Degno N; Zaidi A; Youhana A; Argano V
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Dec; 130(6):1668-74. PubMed ID: 16308014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hemodynamic performance of the Medtronic Mosaic and Perimount Magna aortic bioprostheses: five-year results of a prospectively randomized study.
    Dalmau MJ; González-Santos JM; Blázquez JA; Sastre JA; López-Rodríguez J; Bueno M; Castaño M; Arribas A
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Jun; 39(6):844-52; discussion 852. PubMed ID: 21193320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rest and exercise hemodynamics following aortic valve replacement. A comparison between 19 and 21 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Carpentier-Edwards porcine valves.
    Bove EL; Marvasti MA; Potts JL; Reger MJ; Zamora JL; Eich RH; Parker FB
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Nov; 90(5):750-5. PubMed ID: 4058047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Results of aortic valve replacement with a new supra-annular pericardial stented bioprosthesis.
    Pavoni D; Badano LP; Musumeci SF; Frassani R; Gianfagna P; Mazzaro E; Livi U
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Dec; 82(6):2133-8. PubMed ID: 17126124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relation between size of prosthesis and valve gradient: comparison of two aortic bioprosthesis.
    Seitelberger R; Bialy J; Gottardi R; Seebacher G; Moidl R; Mittelböck M; Simon P; Wolner E
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 15019661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.