118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19752412)
1. Confounding of subgroup analyses in randomized data.
Groenwold RH; Donders AR; van der Heijden GJ; Hoes AW; Rovers MM
Arch Intern Med; 2009 Sep; 169(16):1532-4. PubMed ID: 19752412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Interpretation of epidemiologic studies].
Schaffer P; Velten M
Rev Prat; 2002 May; 52(10):1131-7. PubMed ID: 12107937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Understanding statistical terms: 1.
Drug Ther Bull; 2009 Feb; 47(2):22-4. PubMed ID: 19193703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Concerns about published data from the estrogen-progestin (HT) arm of the WHI.
Gass M; Anderson GL; Barad D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jan; 192(1):333; author reply 334. PubMed ID: 15672044
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Confounding by indication and past clinical trials.
Porta M
Epidemiology; 1997 Mar; 8(2):219-20. PubMed ID: 9229221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The challenge of subgroup analyses--reporting without distorting.
Lagakos SW
N Engl J Med; 2006 Apr; 354(16):1667-9. PubMed ID: 16625007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Re: "Variable selection for propensity score models".
Shrier I; Platt RW; Steele RJ
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Jul; 166(2):238-9. PubMed ID: 17526863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. "Smoke-free Class Competition": far-reaching conclusions based on weak data.
Hanewinkel R; Wiborg G; Isensee B; Nebot M; Vartiainen E
Prev Med; 2006 Aug; 43(2):150-1; discussion 151-3. PubMed ID: 16675005
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomised controlled trials: subgroup analyses.
Sedgwick P
BMJ; 2014 Dec; 349():g7513. PubMed ID: 25500585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Problems with causality.
Ernst E
Rheumatology (Oxford); 2007 Sep; 46(9):1388. PubMed ID: 17698498
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Confounding: regression adjustment.
Fitzmaurice G
Nutrition; 2006 May; 22(5):581-3. PubMed ID: 16600821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Crossover studies: a modified analysis with more power.
Cleophas TJ
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1993 May; 53(5):515-20. PubMed ID: 8491062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bias in observational studies.
Ranstam J
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):644-5. PubMed ID: 18568556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Statistical data as scientific cosmetics].
Taube A
Lakartidningen; 1997 Jun; 94(23):2157. PubMed ID: 9213674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Abecedary of the "annales". Part 11].
Slim K
Ann Chir; 2006 Mar; 131(3):224-6. PubMed ID: 16457773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical trials and P values.
Cooke RW; Weindling AM
Pediatrics; 1993 Jul; 92(1):188-9. PubMed ID: 8516078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Analyzing a randomized trial.
Ranstam J
Acta Radiol; 2008 Nov; 49(9):1005-6. PubMed ID: 18608028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Observational versus randomised trial evidence.
Brotman DJ
Lancet; 2004 Aug 28-Sep 3; 364(9436):757. PubMed ID: 15337397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Dropouts and missing data in psychiatric clinical trials.
Potkin SG; Siu CO
Am J Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 166(11):1295; author reply 1295-6. PubMed ID: 19884237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
