BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19753611)

  • 1. Modification of pulse sequences reduces occupational exposure from MRI switched gradient fields: Preliminary results.
    Wilén J; Hauksson J; Mild KH
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2010 Jan; 31(1):85-7. PubMed ID: 19753611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis and measurements of magnetic field exposures for healthcare workers in selected MR environments.
    Fuentes MA; Trakic A; Wilson SJ; Crozier S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Apr; 55(4):1355-64. PubMed ID: 18390326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Occupational exposure measurements of static and pulsed gradient magnetic fields in the vicinity of MRI scanners.
    Kännälä S; Toivo T; Alanko T; Jokela K
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(7):2243-57. PubMed ID: 19293469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exposure of workers to pulsed gradients in MRI.
    Crozier S; Wang H; Trakic A; Liu F
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 26(5):1236-54. PubMed ID: 17969133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of electromagnetic field exposure limits in Europe: is the future of interventional MRI safe?
    Hill DL; McLeish K; Keevil SF
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Sep; 12(9):1135-42. PubMed ID: 16099687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of electric fields induced in a human subject due to natural movements in static magnetic fields or exposure to alternating magnetic field gradients.
    Glover PM; Bowtell R
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(2):361-73. PubMed ID: 18184992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Health effects of occupational exposure to static magnetic fields used in magnetic resonance imaging: a review].
    Franco G; Perduri R; Murolo A
    Med Lav; 2008; 99(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 18254536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurements of occupational exposure to switched gradient and spatially-varying magnetic fields in areas adjacent to 1.5 T clinical MRI systems.
    Riches SF; Collins DJ; Charles-Edwards GD; Shafford JC; Cole J; Keevil SF; Leach MO
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 26(5):1346-52. PubMed ID: 17969176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Personal exposure to static and time-varying magnetic fields during MRI system test procedures.
    de Vocht F; Muller F; Engels H; Kromhout H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Nov; 30(5):1223-8. PubMed ID: 19856458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Weighted-peak assessment of occupational exposure due to MRI gradient fields and movements in a nonhomogeneous static magnetic field.
    Andreuccetti D; Contessa GM; Falsaperla R; Lodato R; Pinto R; Zoppetti N; Rossi P
    Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011910. PubMed ID: 23298101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurement of the weighted peak level for occupational exposure to gradient magnetic fields for 1.5 and 3 Tesla MRI body scanners.
    Bonutti F; Tecchio M; Maieron M; Trevisan D; Negro C; Calligaris F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Mar; 168(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 25987585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in an open low-field magnetic resonance imaging system: clinical experience and technical considerations.
    Szelényi A; Gasser T; Seifert V
    Neurosurgery; 2008 Oct; 63(4 Suppl 2):268-75; discussion 275-6. PubMed ID: 18981832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Experimental evaluation of the occupational exposure to static magnetic fields on a 3 T magnetic resonance scanner].
    Moro L; Alabiso F; Parisoli F; Frigerio F
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2013; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 23798231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Study on the permanent MRI technology].
    Wang H; Lin QD
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2001 Mar; 25(2):72-4. PubMed ID: 12583143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inventory of MRI applications and workers exposed to MRI-related electromagnetic fields in the Netherlands.
    Schaap K; Christopher-De Vries Y; Slottje P; Kromhout H
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2279-85. PubMed ID: 24055183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exposure classification of MRI workers in epidemiological studies.
    Hansson Mild K; Hand J; Hietanen M; Gowland P; Karpowicz J; Keevil S; Lagroye I; van Rongen E; Scarfi MR; Wilén J
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2013 Jan; 34(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 22532229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design of field-cycled magnetic resonance systems for small animal imaging.
    Gilbert KM; Handler WB; Scholl TJ; Odegaard JW; Chronik BA
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(11):2825-41. PubMed ID: 16723769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance test of an LSO-APD detector in a 7-T MRI scanner for simultaneous PET/MRI.
    Pichler BJ; Judenhofer MS; Catana C; Walton JH; Kneilling M; Nutt RE; Siegel SB; Claussen CD; Cherry SR
    J Nucl Med; 2006 Apr; 47(4):639-47. PubMed ID: 16595498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integrating a MRI scanner with a 6 MV radiotherapy accelerator: impact of the surface orientation on the entrance and exit dose due to the transverse magnetic field.
    Raaijmakers AJ; Raaymakers BW; van der Meer S; Lagendijk JJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(4):929-39. PubMed ID: 17264362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MR safety at high magnetic fields.
    Schenck JF
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1998 Nov; 6(4):715-30. PubMed ID: 9799852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.