These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Evaluation of a bioabsorbable physical barrier for guided bone regeneration. Part I. Material alone. Mellonig JT; Nevins M; Sanchez R Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1998 Apr; 18(2):139-49. PubMed ID: 9663091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Permeability of Streptococcus mutans and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans Through guided tissue regeneration membranes and their effects on attachment of periodontal ligament cells. Hung SL; Lin YW; Wang YH; Chen YT; Su CY; Ling LJ J Periodontol; 2002 Aug; 73(8):843-51. PubMed ID: 12211492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do your membranes have enough space? Bills IG Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 2000 Oct; 15():306-8. PubMed ID: 11709961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term results of guided tissue regeneration therapy with non-resorbable and bioabsorbable barriers. II. A case series of infrabony defects. Kim TS; Holle R; Hausmann E; Eickholz P J Periodontol; 2002 Apr; 73(4):450-9. PubMed ID: 11990447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of bioabsorbable and non-resorbable membranes in the treatment of dehiscence-type defects. A histomorphometric study in dogs. da Silva Pereira SL; Sallum AW; Casati MZ; Caffesse RG; Weng D; Nociti FH; Sallum EA J Periodontol; 2000 Aug; 71(8):1306-14. PubMed ID: 10972646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro comparison of bioabsorbable and non-resorbable membranes in bone regeneration. Marinucci L; Lilli C; Baroni T; Becchetti E; Belcastro S; Balducci C; Locci P J Periodontol; 2001 Jun; 72(6):753-9. PubMed ID: 11453237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term results of guided tissue regeneration therapy with non-resorbable and bioabsorbable barriers. IV. A case series of infrabony defects after 10 years. Pretzl B; Kim TS; Holle R; Eickholz P J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1491-9. PubMed ID: 18673000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Guided tissue regeneration: comparison of bioabsorbable and non-bioabsorbable membranes. Histologic and histometric study in dogs. Caffesse RG; Nasjleti CE; Morrison EC; Sanchez R J Periodontol; 1994 Jun; 65(6):583-91. PubMed ID: 8083790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The degradation of the three layered nano-carbonated hydroxyapatite/collagen/PLGA composite membrane in vitro. Liao S; Watari F; Zhu Y; Uo M; Akasaka T; Wang W; Xu G; Cui F Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1120-8. PubMed ID: 17095082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Collagen based barrier membranes for periodontal guided bone regeneration applications. Sheikh Z; Qureshi J; Alshahrani AM; Nassar H; Ikeda Y; Glogauer M; Ganss B Odontology; 2017 Jan; 105(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 27613193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of 2 bioabsorbable barrier membranes in the treatment of interproximal intrabony periodontal defects. Mattson JS; Gallagher SJ; Jabro MH J Periodontol; 1999 May; 70(5):510-7. PubMed ID: 10368055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A bioresorbable barrier in the treatment of gingival recession: description of a new resorbable dome device. Tinti C; Manfrini F; Parma-Benfenati S Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2001 Feb; 21(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 11829033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term results of guided tissue regeneration therapy with non-resorbable and bioabsorbable barriers. I. Class II furcations. Eickholz P; Kim TS; Holle R; Hausmann E J Periodontol; 2001 Jan; 72(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 11210071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]