117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19754273)
1. Sorting cancer karyotypes by elementary operations.
Ozery-Flato M; Shamir R
J Comput Biol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1445-60. PubMed ID: 19754273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reconstructing cancer karyotypes from short read data: the half empty and half full glass.
Eitan R; Shamir R
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):488. PubMed ID: 29141589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the karyotypic origin and evolution of cancer cells.
Nicholson JM; Duesberg P
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2009 Oct; 194(2):96-110. PubMed ID: 19781442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The prognosis and cytogenetic characteristics of acute erythroid leukemia: a report of 55 cases].
Liu J; Lu DP; Zhang Y
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Sep; 45(9):738-40. PubMed ID: 17166448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reconstruction of clone- and haplotype-specific cancer genome karyotypes from bulk tumor samples.
Aganezov S; Raphael BJ
Genome Res; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1274-1290. PubMed ID: 32887685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Possible causes of chromosome instability: comparison of chromosomal abnormalities in cancer cell lines with mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHK2 and BUB1.
Grigorova M; Staines JM; Ozdag H; Caldas C; Edwards PA
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2004; 104(1-4):333-40. PubMed ID: 15162061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CytoGPS: A large-scale karyotype analysis of CML data.
Abrams ZB; Li S; Zhang L; Coombes CE; Payne PRO; Heerema NA; Abruzzo LV; Coombes KR
Cancer Genet; 2020 Oct; 248-249():34-38. PubMed ID: 33059160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cancer-causing karyotypes: chromosomal equilibria between destabilizing aneuploidy and stabilizing selection for oncogenic function.
Li L; McCormack AA; Nicholson JM; Fabarius A; Hehlmann R; Sachs RK; Duesberg PH
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2009 Jan; 188(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 19061776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chromosome abnormalities defined by conventional cytogenetics in plasma cell leukemia: what have we learned about its biology?
Jimenez-Zepeda VH; Neme-Yunes Y; Braggio E
Eur J Haematol; 2011 Jul; 87(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 21692850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stochastic cancer progression driven by non-clonal chromosome aberrations.
Heng HH; Stevens JB; Liu G; Bremer SW; Ye KJ; Reddy PV; Wu GS; Wang YA; Tainsky MA; Ye CJ
J Cell Physiol; 2006 Aug; 208(2):461-72. PubMed ID: 16688757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CGHsweep: an algorithm for analyzing chromosomal aberrations in genome using aCGH profiles.
Karmaker A; Kwek S
In Silico Biol; 2007; 7(6):639-49. PubMed ID: 18467776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chromosome aberrations in solid tumors have a stochastic nature.
Castro MA; Onsten TG; Moreira JC; de Almeida RM
Mutat Res; 2006 Aug; 600(1-2):150-64. PubMed ID: 16814328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chromosome abnormalities in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas: analysis of 231 Chinese patients.
Zhao X; Fan R; Lin G; Wang X
Hematol Oncol; 2013 Sep; 31(3):127-35. PubMed ID: 23135954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Banding Together: A Systematic Comparison of The Cancer Genome Atlas and the Mitelman Databases.
Denomy C; Germain S; Haave B; Vizeacoumar FS; Freywald A; Weaver BA; Vizeacoumar FJ
Cancer Res; 2019 Oct; 79(20):5181-5190. PubMed ID: 31416843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Large-scale analysis of chromosomal aberrations in cancer karyotypes reveals two distinct paths to aneuploidy.
Ozery-Flato M; Linhart C; Trakhtenbrot L; Izraeli S; Shamir R
Genome Biol; 2011 Jun; 12(6):R61. PubMed ID: 21714908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Karyotype analysis of amniotic fluid cells and comparison of chromosomal abnormality rate during second trimester].
Zhang YP; Wu JP; Li XT; Lei CX; Xu JZ; Yin M
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Sep; 46(9):644-8. PubMed ID: 22176986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recovering rearranged cancer chromosomes from karyotype graphs.
Aganezov S; Zban I; Aksenov V; Alexeev N; Schatz MC
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 20):641. PubMed ID: 31842730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of cytogenetic methods to analysis of etiologic factors in carcinogenesis.
Mitelman F
IARC Sci Publ; 1982; (39):481-96. PubMed ID: 6759387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A cloud-based resource for genome coordinate-based exploration and large-scale analysis of chromosome aberrations and gene fusions in cancer.
Wang J; Zheng J; Lee EE; Aguilar B; Phan J; Abdilleh K; Taylor RC; Longabaugh W; Johansson B; Mertens F; Mitelman F; Pot D; LaFramboise T
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2023 Aug; 62(8):441-448. PubMed ID: 36695636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Embryonic karyotype in recurrent miscarriage with parental karyotypic aberrations.
Carp H; Guetta E; Dorf H; Soriano D; Barkai G; Schiff E
Fertil Steril; 2006 Feb; 85(2):446-50. PubMed ID: 16595225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
