These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19755694)
1. Tort claims and federal regulation of medical devices vs pharmaceuticals. Green M JAMA; 2009 Sep; 302(11):1169; author reply 1169-70. PubMed ID: 19755694 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Regulating the safety of pharmaceuticals: the FDA, preemption, and the public's health. Gostin LO JAMA; 2009 May; 301(19):2036-7. PubMed ID: 19454642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The federal preemption debate in pharmaceutical labeling product liability actions. Gross JM; Curry JA Tort Trial Insur Pract Law J; 2007; 43(1):35-70. PubMed ID: 18354866 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Pharmaceuticals and medical devices: FDA oversight. End-of-year issue brief. Chaps NA Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2010 Jan; ():1-31. PubMed ID: 20217914 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Good law from tragic facts--Congress, the FDA, and preemption. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 2009 Sep; 361(12):1206-11. PubMed ID: 19759383 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Permitting product liability litigation for FDA-approved drugs and devices promotes patient safety. Kesselheim AS Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Jun; 87(6):645-7. PubMed ID: 20485322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pharmaceuticals and medical devices: FDA oversight. Issue brief. Thomson Reuters/West Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2011 Jan; ():1-39. PubMed ID: 21374841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Pharmaceuticals and medical devices: FDA oversight. Issue brief. Berry MD Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2012 Dec; ():1-79. PubMed ID: 23297449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The case for preemption of prescription drug failure-to-warn claims. Kim CH Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(2):399-422. PubMed ID: 17632969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Bad medicine: prescription drugs, preemption, and the potential for a no-fault fix. Smirniotopoulos A Rev Law Soc Change; 2012; 35(4):793-862. PubMed ID: 22363960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Regulatory experts debate FDA's authority. Young D Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2007 May; 64(9):910, 912. PubMed ID: 17468140 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Legal and economic perspectives concerning US government investigations of alleged off-label promotion by drug manufacturers. Kalb PE; Greenberg PE Pharmacoeconomics; 2009; 27(8):623-5. PubMed ID: 19835018 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Pharmaceuticals and medical devices: business practices. Issue brief. Steiner DJ Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2012 Dec; ():1-36. PubMed ID: 23297448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Presumption of innocence: FDA's authority to regulate the specifics of prescription drug labeling and the preemption debate. Dorfman HL; Quinn VM; Brophy EA Food Drug Law J; 2006; 61(4):585-622. PubMed ID: 17180765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Supreme Court, preemption, and malpractice liability. Kesselheim AS; Studdert DM N Engl J Med; 2009 Feb; 360(6):559-61. PubMed ID: 19196672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Pharmaceuticals and medical devices: FDA oversight. ; Berry MD Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2012 Jan; ():1-86. PubMed ID: 22403845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Unlabeled drug samples and the learned intermediary: the case for drug company liability without preemption. Poser S Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(4):653-94. PubMed ID: 18557225 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Pros and cons of off-label promotion investigations and prosecutions. Loucks MK Food Drug Law J; 2006; 61(3):577-83. PubMed ID: 16989041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]