155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19757401)
1. Confidence of expert ultrasound operators in making a diagnosis of adnexal tumor: effect on diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement.
Yazbek J; Ameye L; Testa AC; Valentin L; Timmerman D; Holland TK; Van Holsbeke C; Jurkovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jan; 35(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 19757401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of ultrasound pattern recognition by expert operators to identify borderline ovarian tumors: a study of diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement.
Yazbek J; Ameye L; Timmerman D; Testa AC; Valentin L; Holland TK; Van Holsbeke C; Jurkovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jan; 35(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 19746450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasound experience substantially impacts on diagnostic performance and confidence when adnexal masses are classified using pattern recognition.
Van Holsbeke C; Daemen A; Yazbek J; Holland TK; Bourne T; Mesens T; Lannoo L; Boes AS; Joos A; Van De Vijver A; Roggen N; de Moor B; de Jonge E; Testa AC; Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Timmerman D
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2010; 69(3):160-8. PubMed ID: 20016188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intra- and interobserver agreement when describing adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terms and definitions: a study on three-dimensional ultrasound volumes.
Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 41(3):318-27. PubMed ID: 22915506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subjective assessment of adnexal masses with the use of ultrasonography: an analysis of interobserver variability and experience.
Timmerman D; Schwärzler P; Collins WP; Claerhout F; Coenen M; Amant F; Vergote I; Bourne TH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jan; 13(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 10201081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intra- and interobserver variability of 2D and 3D transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of benign versus malignant adnexal masses.
Pascual MA; Graupera B; Hereter L; Rotili A; Rodriguez I; Alcázar JL
J Clin Ultrasound; 2011 Jul; 39(6):316-21. PubMed ID: 21500198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interobserver agreement in describing adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules in a real-time setting and using three-dimensional ultrasound volumes and digital clips.
Ruiz de Gauna B; Sanchez P; Pineda L; Utrilla-Layna J; Juez L; Alcázar JL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 24265132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intravenous contrast ultrasound examination using contrast-tuned imaging (CnTI) and the contrast medium SonoVue for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses with solid components.
Testa AC; Timmerman D; Van Belle V; Fruscella E; Van Holsbeke C; Savelli L; Ferrazzi E; Leone FP; Marret H; Tranquart F; Exacoustos C; Nazzaro G; Bokor D; Magri F; Van Huffel S; Ferrandina G; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Dec; 34(6):699-710. PubMed ID: 19924735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical and ultrasound characteristics of surgically removed adnexal lesions with largest diameter ≤ 2.5 cm: a pictorial essay.
Di Legge A; Pollastri P; Mancari R; Ludovisi M; Mascilini F; Franchi D; Jurkovic D; Coccia ME; Timmerman D; Scambia G; Testa A; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 50(5):648-656. PubMed ID: 28004457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultrasound characteristics of different types of adnexal malignancies.
Valentin L; Ameye L; Testa A; Lécuru F; Bernard JP; Paladini D; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Jul; 102(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 16386783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimating risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: external validation of the ADNEX model and comparison with other frequently used ultrasound methods.
Meys EMJ; Jeelof LS; Achten NMJ; Slangen BFM; Lambrechts S; Kruitwagen RFPM; Van Gorp T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 49(6):784-792. PubMed ID: 27514486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrasound methods to distinguish between malignant and benign adnexal masses in the hands of examiners with different levels of experience.
Van Holsbeke C; Daemen A; Yazbek J; Holland TK; Bourne T; Mesens T; Lannoo L; De Moor B; De Jonge E; Testa AC; Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):454-61. PubMed ID: 19736644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound examination for assigning a specific diagnosis to adnexal masses.
Sokalska A; Timmerman D; Testa AC; Van Holsbeke C; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Jurkovic D; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):462-70. PubMed ID: 19685552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
Timmerman D; Testa AC; Bourne T; Ameye L; Jurkovic D; Van Holsbeke C; Paladini D; Van Calster B; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 31(6):681-90. PubMed ID: 18504770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. External validation of IOTA simple descriptors and simple rules for classifying adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; Pascual MA; Graupera B; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana A; Hereter L; Ajossa S; Guerriero S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 48(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 26748432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [External validation of simple ultrasound rules of Timmerman on 122 ovarian tumors].
Fathallah K; Huchon C; Bats AS; Metzger U; Lefrère-Belda MA; Bensaid C; Lécuru F
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2011 Sep; 39(9):477-81. PubMed ID: 21820936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Real-time ultrasound vs. evaluation of static images in the preoperative assessment of adnexal masses.
Van Holsbeke C; Yazbek J; Holland TK; Daemen A; De Moor B; Testa AC; Valentin L; Jurkovic D; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Nov; 32(6):828-31. PubMed ID: 18925606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of ultrasound subjective 'pattern recognition' for the diagnosis of borderline ovarian tumors.
Yazbek J; Raju KS; Ben-Nagi J; Holland T; Hillaby K; Jurkovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):489-95. PubMed ID: 17444554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective external validation of the 'ovarian crescent sign' as a single ultrasound parameter to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal pathology.
Van Holsbeke C; Van Belle V; Leone FP; Guerriero S; Paladini D; Melis GB; Greggi S; Fischerova D; De Jonge E; Neven P; Bourne T; Valentin L; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jul; 36(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20217895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement of grayscale typical ultrasonographic patterns for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
Guerriero S; Alcazar JL; Pascual MA; Ajossa S; Gerada M; Bargellini R; Virgilio B; Melis GB
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1711-6. PubMed ID: 18524459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
