These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19757911)

  • 21. Specificity of face processing without awareness.
    Zhou G; Zhang L; Liu J; Yang J; Qu Z
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):408-12. PubMed ID: 20116293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The M170 reflects a viewpoint-dependent representation for both familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Ewbank MP; Smith WA; Hancock ER; Andrews TJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Feb; 18(2):364-70. PubMed ID: 17507454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A computational model of dysfunctional facial encoding in congenital prosopagnosia.
    Stollhoff R; Kennerknecht I; Elze T; Jost J
    Neural Netw; 2011 Aug; 24(6):652-64. PubMed ID: 21458953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Orientation dependence of the orientation-contingent face aftereffect.
    Watson TL; Clifford CW
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(20):3422-9. PubMed ID: 16723149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Are representations of unfamiliar faces independent of encoding modality?
    Casey SJ; Newell FN
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):506-13. PubMed ID: 16597451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Face perception is tuned to horizontal orientation in the N170 time window.
    Jacques C; Schiltz C; Goffaux V
    J Vis; 2014 Feb; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 24511144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Adaptation in the fusiform face area (FFA): image or person?
    Xu X; Yue X; Lescroart MD; Biederman I; Kim JG
    Vision Res; 2009 Nov; 49(23):2800-7. PubMed ID: 19712692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Spatial interactions in upright and inverted faces: re-exploration of spatial scale influence.
    Goffaux V
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(7):774-81. PubMed ID: 19236892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Male and female faces are only perceived categorically when linked to familiar identities--and when in doubt, he is a male.
    Armann R; Bülthoff I
    Vision Res; 2012 Jun; 63():69-80. PubMed ID: 22595743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Using spatial frequency scales for processing face features and face configuration: an ERP analysis.
    Flevaris AV; Robertson LC; Bentin S
    Brain Res; 2008 Feb; 1194():100-9. PubMed ID: 18190897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Characterisation of the sympathetic skin response evoked by own-face recognition in healthy subjects.
    Bagnato S; Boccagni C; Prestandrea C; Galardi G
    Funct Neurol; 2010; 25(2):93-102. PubMed ID: 20923607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects.
    Leopold DA; O'Toole AJ; Vetter T; Blanz V
    Nat Neurosci; 2001 Jan; 4(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 11135650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The shape of the face template: geometric distortions of faces and their detection in natural scenes.
    Pongakkasira K; Bindemann M
    Vision Res; 2015 Apr; 109(Pt A):99-106. PubMed ID: 25727491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Spatial frequency tuning of upright and inverted face identification.
    Gaspar C; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ
    Vision Res; 2008 Dec; 48(28):2817-26. PubMed ID: 18835403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Face recognition memory and configural processing: a developmental ERP study using upright, inverted, and contrast-reversed faces.
    Itier RJ; Taylor MJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 16(3):487-502. PubMed ID: 15072683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fixed or flexible? Orientation preference in identity and gaze processing in humans.
    Goffaux V
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210503. PubMed ID: 30682035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sex differences in face gender recognition in humans.
    Cellerino A; Borghetti D; Sartucci F
    Brain Res Bull; 2004 Jul; 63(6):443-9. PubMed ID: 15249109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The involvement of the "fusiform face area" in processing facial expression.
    Ganel T; Valyear KF; Goshen-Gottstein Y; Goodale MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(11):1645-54. PubMed ID: 16009246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sex differences in face gender recognition: an event-related potential study.
    Sun Y; Gao X; Han S
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1327():69-76. PubMed ID: 20153301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.