BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

673 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19759454)

  • 1. Comparison of biological activated carbon (BAC) and membrane bioreactor (MBR) for pollutants removal in drinking water treatment.
    Tian JY; Chen ZL; Liang H; Li X; Wang ZZ; Li GB
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(6):1515-23. PubMed ID: 19759454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hybrid process of BAC and sMBR for treating polluted raw water.
    Tian JY; Chen ZL; Yang YL; Liang H; Nan J; Wang ZZ; Li GB
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Dec; 100(24):6243-9. PubMed ID: 19682892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Membrane bioreactor for the drinking water treatment of polluted surface water supplies.
    Li XY; Chu HP
    Water Res; 2003 Nov; 37(19):4781-91. PubMed ID: 14568065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Membrane coagulation bioreactor (MCBR) for drinking water treatment.
    Tian JY; Liang H; Li X; You SJ; Tian S; Li GB
    Water Res; 2008 Aug; 42(14):3910-20. PubMed ID: 18674791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of PAC dosage in a pilot-scale PAC-MBR treating micro-polluted surface water.
    Hu J; Shang R; Deng H; Heijman SG; Rietveld LC
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Feb; 154():290-6. PubMed ID: 24412856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between sequential and simultaneous application of activated carbon with membrane bioreactor for trace organic contaminant removal.
    Nguyen LN; Hai FI; Kang J; Nghiem LD; Price WE; Guo W; Ngo HH; Tung KL
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Feb; 130():412-7. PubMed ID: 23313687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Drinking water denitrification using a membrane bioreactor.
    Ergas SJ; Rheinheimer DE
    Water Res; 2004; 38(14-15):3225-32. PubMed ID: 15276738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The removal of residual organic matter from biologically treated swine wastewater using membrane bioreactor process with powdered activated carbon.
    Whang GD; Cho YM; Park H; Jang JG
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(5-6):451-7. PubMed ID: 15137457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simultaneous removal of organic matter and nitrogen compounds by combining a membrane bioreactor and a membrane biofilm reactor.
    Hasar H
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 May; 100(10):2699-705. PubMed ID: 19186053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ozonation effect on natural organic matter adsorption and biodegradation--application to a membrane bioreactor containing activated carbon for drinking water production.
    Treguer R; Tatin R; Couvert A; Wolbert D; Tazi-Pain A
    Water Res; 2010 Feb; 44(3):781-8. PubMed ID: 19906398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pharmaceutical rejection by membranes for wastewater reclamation and reuse.
    Park GY; Lee JH; Kim IS; Cho J
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(2):239-44. PubMed ID: 15344797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of two treatments for the removal of selected organic micropollutants and bulk organic matter: conventional activated sludge followed by ultrafiltration versus membrane bioreactor.
    Sahar E; Ernst M; Godehardt M; Hein A; Herr J; Kazner C; Melin T; Cikurel H; Aharoni A; Messalem R; Brenner A; Jekel M
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(4):733-40. PubMed ID: 21330721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performances of a hybrid adsorption/submerged membrane biological process for toxic waste removal.
    Lesage N; Spérandio M; Cabassud C
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):173-80. PubMed ID: 16003976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Membrane bioreactor process for removing biodegradable organic matter from water.
    Williams MD; Pirbazari M
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3880-93. PubMed ID: 17643469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characterization of organic membrane foulants in a submerged membrane bioreactor with pre-ozonation using three-dimensional excitation-emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy.
    Liu T; Chen ZL; Yu WZ; You SJ
    Water Res; 2011 Feb; 45(5):2111-21. PubMed ID: 21269657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enhanced performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor with powdered activated carbon addition for municipal secondary effluent treatment.
    Lin H; Wang F; Ding L; Hong H; Chen J; Lu X
    J Hazard Mater; 2011 Sep; 192(3):1509-14. PubMed ID: 21794980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biodegradation of persistent polar pollutants in wastewater: comparison of an optimised lab-scale membrane bioreactor and activated sludge treatment.
    Bernhard M; Müller J; Knepper TP
    Water Res; 2006 Oct; 40(18):3419-28. PubMed ID: 16962630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates removal in conventional activated sludge systems and membrane bioreactors.
    De Wever H; Van Roy S; Dotremont C; Miller J; Knepper T
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(5):219-25. PubMed ID: 15497851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long term operation of high concentration powdered activated carbon membrane bio-reactor for advanced water treatment.
    Seo GT; Moon CD; Chang SW; Lee SH
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(8):81-7. PubMed ID: 15566190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simultaneous activated carbon adsorption within a membrane bioreactor for an enhanced micropollutant removal.
    Li X; Hai FI; Nghiem LD
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 May; 102(9):5319-24. PubMed ID: 21145232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.