These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19760395)

  • 1. Prospective meta-analysis using individual patient data in intensive care medicine.
    Reade MC; Delaney A; Bailey MJ; Harrison DA; Yealy DM; Jones PG; Rowan KM; Bellomo R; Angus DC
    Intensive Care Med; 2010 Jan; 36(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 19760395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meta-analysis of a continuous outcome combining individual patient data and aggregate data: a method based on simulated individual patient data.
    Yamaguchi Y; Sakamoto W; Goto M; Staessen JA; Wang J; Gueyffier F; Riley RD
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):322-51. PubMed ID: 26052956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The strengths and limitations of meta-analyses based on aggregate data.
    Lyman GH; Kuderer NM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Apr; 5():14. PubMed ID: 15850485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Survey finds that most meta-analysts do not attempt to collect individual patient data.
    Kovalchik SA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Dec; 65(12):1296-9. PubMed ID: 22981246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meta-analysis of continuous outcomes combining individual patient data and aggregate data.
    Riley RD; Lambert PC; Staessen JA; Wang J; Gueyffier F; Thijs L; Boutitie F
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(11):1870-93. PubMed ID: 18069721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
    Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
    Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical approaches to identify subgroups in meta-analysis of individual participant data: a simulation study.
    Belias M; Rovers MM; Reitsma JB; Debray TPA; IntHout J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Sep; 19(1):183. PubMed ID: 31477023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual patient data meta-analysis in intensive care medicine and contextual effects.
    Hurley JC
    Intensive Care Med; 2010 May; 36(5):903-4; author reply 905. PubMed ID: 20232051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of aggregate and individual participant data approaches to meta-analysis of randomised trials: An observational study.
    Tierney JF; Fisher DJ; Burdett S; Stewart LA; Parmar MKB
    PLoS Med; 2020 Jan; 17(1):e1003019. PubMed ID: 32004320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficient two-step multivariate random effects meta-analysis of individual participant data for longitudinal clinical trials using mixed effects models.
    Noma H; Maruo K; Gosho M; Levine SZ; Goldberg Y; Leucht S; Furukawa TA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Feb; 19(1):33. PubMed ID: 30764757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cumulative subgroup analysis to reduce waste in clinical research for individualised medicine.
    Song F; Bachmann MO
    BMC Med; 2016 Dec; 14(1):197. PubMed ID: 27974045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical analysis of individual participant data meta-analyses: a comparison of methods and recommendations for practice.
    Stewart GB; Altman DG; Askie LM; Duley L; Simmonds MC; Stewart LA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e46042. PubMed ID: 23056232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: Using pseudo IPD created from aggregate data to adjust for baseline imbalance and assess treatment-by-baseline modification.
    Papadimitropoulou K; Stijnen T; Riley RD; Dekkers OM; le Cessie S
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):780-794. PubMed ID: 32643264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mixed treatment comparisons using aggregate and individual participant level data.
    Saramago P; Sutton AJ; Cooper NJ; Manca A
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(28):3516-36. PubMed ID: 22764016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An overview of methods and empirical comparison of aggregate data and individual patient data results for investigating heterogeneity in meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes.
    Smith CT; Williamson PR; Marson AG
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2005 Oct; 11(5):468-78. PubMed ID: 16164588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A recursive partitioning approach for subgroup identification in individual patient data meta-analysis.
    Mistry D; Stallard N; Underwood M
    Stat Med; 2018 Apr; 37(9):1550-1561. PubMed ID: 29383818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual participant data meta-analyses compared with meta-analyses based on aggregate data.
    Tudur Smith C; Marcucci M; Nolan SJ; Iorio A; Sudell M; Riley R; Rovers MM; Williamson PR
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Sep; 9(9):MR000007. PubMed ID: 27595791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multivariate meta-analysis using individual participant data.
    Riley RD; Price MJ; Jackson D; Wardle M; Gueyffier F; Wang J; Staessen JA; White IR
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Jun; 6(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 26099484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.