185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19761098)
1. Model selection for time-activity curves: the corrected Akaike information criterion and the F-test.
Kletting P; Glatting G
Z Med Phys; 2009; 19(3):200-6. PubMed ID: 19761098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bayesian phylogenetic model selection using reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo.
Huelsenbeck JP; Larget B; Alfaro ME
Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Jun; 21(6):1123-33. PubMed ID: 15034130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the Akaike Information Criterion, the Schwarz criterion and the F test as guides to model selection.
Ludden TM; Beal SL; Sheiner LB
J Pharmacokinet Biopharm; 1994 Oct; 22(5):431-45. PubMed ID: 7791040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) gives exact results under the assumption of model error.
Wilkinson RD
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2013 May; 12(2):129-41. PubMed ID: 23652634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance comparison of first-order conditional estimation with interaction and Bayesian estimation methods for estimating the population parameters and its distribution from data sets with a low number of subjects.
Pradhan S; Song B; Lee J; Chae JW; Kim KI; Back HM; Han N; Kwon KI; Yun HY
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):154. PubMed ID: 29191177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Model selection and psychological theory: a discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC).
Vrieze SI
Psychol Methods; 2012 Jun; 17(2):228-43. PubMed ID: 22309957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing convergence of Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations in hierarchical Bayesian models for population pharmacokinetics.
Dodds MG; Vicini P
Ann Biomed Eng; 2004 Sep; 32(9):1300-13. PubMed ID: 15493516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the Use of Information Criteria for Model Selection in Phylogenetics.
Susko E; Roger AJ
Mol Biol Evol; 2020 Feb; 37(2):549-562. PubMed ID: 31688943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Choosing the optimal fit function: comparison of the Akaike information criterion and the F-test.
Glatting G; Kletting P; Reske SN; Hohl K; Ring C
Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4285-92. PubMed ID: 18072493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fitting a linear-linear piecewise growth mixture model with unknown knots: A comparison of two common approaches to inference.
Kohli N; Hughes J; Wang C; Zopluoglu C; Davison ML
Psychol Methods; 2015 Jun; 20(2):259-75. PubMed ID: 25867487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Species delimitation using Bayes factors: simulations and application to the Sceloporus scalaris species group (Squamata: Phrynosomatidae).
Grummer JA; Bryson RW; Reeder TW
Syst Biol; 2014 Mar; 63(2):119-33. PubMed ID: 24262383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computational methods for a class of network models.
Wang J; Jasra A; De Iorio M
J Comput Biol; 2014 Feb; 21(2):141-61. PubMed ID: 24144112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative performance of Bayesian and AIC-based measures of phylogenetic model uncertainty.
Alfaro ME; Huelsenbeck JP
Syst Biol; 2006 Feb; 55(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 16507526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Advantages of Binomial Likelihood Maximization for Analyzing and Modeling Cell Survival Curves.
Shuryak I; Sun Y; Balajee AS
Radiat Res; 2016 Mar; 185(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 26930380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Alive SMC(2) : Bayesian model selection for low-count time series models with intractable likelihoods.
Drovandi CC; McCutchan RA
Biometrics; 2016 Jun; 72(2):344-53. PubMed ID: 26584211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Order selection for heterogeneous semiparametric hidden Markov models.
Zou Y; Song X; Zhao Q
Stat Med; 2024 Jun; 43(13):2501-2526. PubMed ID: 38616718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Model Uncertainty and Bayesian Model Averaged Benchmark Dose Estimation for Continuous Data.
Shao K; Gift JS
Risk Anal; 2014 Jan; 34(1):101-20. PubMed ID: 23758102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Approximate Bayesian computation scheme for parameter inference and model selection in dynamical systems.
Toni T; Welch D; Strelkowa N; Ipsen A; Stumpf MP
J R Soc Interface; 2009 Feb; 6(31):187-202. PubMed ID: 19205079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
