These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19761546)

  • 1. Reviewing manuscripts: tips and responsibilities.
    Heddle NM; Ness PM
    Transfusion; 2009 Nov; 49(11):2265-8. PubMed ID: 19761546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comments on European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) guidelines on the role of medical writers in developing peer-reviewed publications.
    Foote M; Hamilton CW; Mallia-Hughes M
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 May; 21(5):703-4; author reply 704. PubMed ID: 15969869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tips for manuscript reviewers.
    Davidhizar R; Bechtel GA
    Nurse Author Ed; 2003; 13(3):1-4. PubMed ID: 12841086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reviewing in science requires quality criteria and professional reviewers.
    Jurkat-Rott K; Lehmann-Horn F
    Eur J Cell Biol; 2004 Apr; 83(3):93-5. PubMed ID: 15202567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reviewing dermatology manuscripts and publications.
    Nelson CA; Freeman SR; Dellavalle RP
    Dermatol Clin; 2009 Apr; 27(2):201-4, viii. PubMed ID: 19254664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The art of peer-reviewing an original research paper: important tips and guidelines.
    Vintzileos AM; Ananth CV
    J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Apr; 29(4):513-8. PubMed ID: 20375370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ensuring the quality of peer-review process.
    Afifi M
    Saudi Med J; 2006 Aug; 27(8):1253. PubMed ID: 16883466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Peer review of scientific manuscripts should be open and referees' bias should be accounted for].
    Thörn A
    Lakartidningen; 2004 Oct; 101(44):3458. PubMed ID: 15560663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rejection: giving it and taking it.
    Taylor D
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2008 Oct; 1(4):275. PubMed ID: 19627792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Debate on peer review. Report from an international congress on peer review].
    Grimby G
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Jul; 99(30-31):3109-10. PubMed ID: 12198929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Writing for publication--research manuscripts.
    Rosati RJ
    J Healthc Qual; 2008; 30(4):2, 47. PubMed ID: 18680918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reviewing scientific manuscripts.
    Castagnetti M; Bagli D; Fossum M;
    J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Apr; 14(2):133-134. PubMed ID: 29429827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Scientific reporting guidelines].
    Nylenna M
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time.
    Clarke SP
    Can J Nurs Res; 2006 Dec; 38(4):5-9. PubMed ID: 17342873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consider the source.
    Mason DJ
    Am J Nurs; 2009 Apr; 109(4):7. PubMed ID: 19325281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [More stringent requirements concerning manuscripts. Declarations of potential connections and conflicts of interest published in the Lakartidningen].
    Milerad J; Ahlberg J; Eliasson M; Fridén B; Håkansson A; Sundberg CJ; Agren H; Ostergren J
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Apr; 99(15):1662-3. PubMed ID: 12025190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reviewing a reviewer.
    Fokin AA
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Mar; 35(3):383-4. PubMed ID: 19196519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Peer review: a closed system in need of reform].
    Thörn A
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Jul; 99(30-31):3106-8. PubMed ID: 12198928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Publication ethics.
    Hays JC
    Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of reviewers' gender on assessments of a gender-related standardized manuscript.
    Caelleigh AS; Hojat M; Steinecke A; Gonnella JS
    Teach Learn Med; 2003; 15(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 12855386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.