These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Comments on European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) guidelines on the role of medical writers in developing peer-reviewed publications. Foote M; Hamilton CW; Mallia-Hughes M Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 May; 21(5):703-4; author reply 704. PubMed ID: 15969869 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reviewing in science requires quality criteria and professional reviewers. Jurkat-Rott K; Lehmann-Horn F Eur J Cell Biol; 2004 Apr; 83(3):93-5. PubMed ID: 15202567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reviewing dermatology manuscripts and publications. Nelson CA; Freeman SR; Dellavalle RP Dermatol Clin; 2009 Apr; 27(2):201-4, viii. PubMed ID: 19254664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The art of peer-reviewing an original research paper: important tips and guidelines. Vintzileos AM; Ananth CV J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Apr; 29(4):513-8. PubMed ID: 20375370 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ensuring the quality of peer-review process. Afifi M Saudi Med J; 2006 Aug; 27(8):1253. PubMed ID: 16883466 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Peer review of scientific manuscripts should be open and referees' bias should be accounted for]. Thörn A Lakartidningen; 2004 Oct; 101(44):3458. PubMed ID: 15560663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Rejection: giving it and taking it. Taylor D J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2008 Oct; 1(4):275. PubMed ID: 19627792 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Debate on peer review. Report from an international congress on peer review]. Grimby G Lakartidningen; 2002 Jul; 99(30-31):3109-10. PubMed ID: 12198929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Peer review: a closed system in need of reform]. Thörn A Lakartidningen; 2002 Jul; 99(30-31):3106-8. PubMed ID: 12198928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Publication ethics. Hays JC Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of reviewers' gender on assessments of a gender-related standardized manuscript. Caelleigh AS; Hojat M; Steinecke A; Gonnella JS Teach Learn Med; 2003; 15(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 12855386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]