314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19761607)
1. Detecting purely epistatic multi-locus interactions by an omnibus permutation test on ensembles of two-locus analyses.
Wongseree W; Assawamakin A; Piroonratana T; Sinsomros S; Limwongse C; Chaiyaratana N
BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Sep; 10():294. PubMed ID: 19761607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An omnibus permutation test on ensembles of two-locus analyses can detect pure epistasis and genetic heterogeneity in genome-wide association studies.
Setsirichok D; Tienboon P; Jaroonruang N; Kittichaijaroen S; Wongseree W; Piroonratana T; Usavanarong T; Limwongse C; Aporntewan C; Phadoongsidhi M; Chaiyaratana N
Springerplus; 2013; 2():230. PubMed ID: 24804170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DualWMDR: Detecting epistatic interaction with dual screening and multifactor dimensionality reduction.
Cao X; Yu G; Ren W; Guo M; Wang J
Hum Mutat; 2020 Mar; 41(3):719-734. PubMed ID: 31705708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gene, pathway and network frameworks to identify epistatic interactions of single nucleotide polymorphisms derived from GWAS data.
Liu Y; Maxwell S; Feng T; Zhu X; Elston RC; Koyutürk M; Chance MR
BMC Syst Biol; 2012; 6 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S15. PubMed ID: 23281810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SNPInterForest: a new method for detecting epistatic interactions.
Yoshida M; Koike A
BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Dec; 12():469. PubMed ID: 22151604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Learning genetic epistasis using Bayesian network scoring criteria.
Jiang X; Neapolitan RE; Barmada MM; Visweswaran S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Mar; 12():89. PubMed ID: 21453508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fast detection of high-order epistatic interactions in genome-wide association studies using information theoretic measure.
Leem S; Jeong HH; Lee J; Wee K; Sohn KA
Comput Biol Chem; 2014 Jun; 50():19-28. PubMed ID: 24581733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cloud computing for detecting high-order genome-wide epistatic interaction via dynamic clustering.
Guo X; Meng Y; Yu N; Pan Y
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Apr; 15():102. PubMed ID: 24717145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. EpiMC: Detecting Epistatic Interactions Using Multiple Clusterings.
Wang J; Zhang H; Ren W; Guo M; Yu G
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2022; 19(1):243-254. PubMed ID: 33989157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MegaSNPHunter: a learning approach to detect disease predisposition SNPs and high level interactions in genome wide association study.
Wan X; Yang C; Yang Q; Xue H; Tang NL; Yu W
BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jan; 10():13. PubMed ID: 19134182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of GMDR-GPU for gene-gene interaction analysis and its application to WTCCC GWAS data for type 2 diabetes.
Zhu Z; Tong X; Zhu Z; Liang M; Cui W; Su K; Li MD; Zhu J
PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e61943. PubMed ID: 23626757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. GWIS--model-free, fast and exhaustive search for epistatic interactions in case-control GWAS.
Goudey B; Rawlinson D; Wang Q; Shi F; Ferra H; Campbell RM; Stern L; Inouye MT; Ong CS; Kowalczyk A
BMC Genomics; 2013; 14 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S10. PubMed ID: 23819779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utilizing Deep Learning and Genome Wide Association Studies for Epistatic-Driven Preterm Birth Classification in African-American Women.
Fergus P; Montanez CC; Abdulaimma B; Lisboa P; Chalmers C; Pineles B
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2020; 17(2):668-678. PubMed ID: 30183645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of epistasis detection methods in semi-simulated GWAS.
Chatelain C; Durand G; Thuillier V; Augé F
BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jun; 19(1):231. PubMed ID: 29914375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating the ability of tree-based methods and logistic regression for the detection of SNP-SNP interaction.
García-Magariños M; López-de-Ullibarri I; Cao R; Salas A
Ann Hum Genet; 2009 May; 73(Pt 3):360-9. PubMed ID: 19291098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detecting epistatic effects in association studies at a genomic level based on an ensemble approach.
Li J; Horstman B; Chen Y
Bioinformatics; 2011 Jul; 27(13):i222-9. PubMed ID: 21685074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enabling personal genomics with an explicit test of epistasis.
Greene CS; Himmelstein DS; Nelson HH; Kelsey KT; Williams SM; Andrew AS; Karagas MR; Moore JH
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2010; ():327-36. PubMed ID: 19908385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel method to identify high order gene-gene interactions in genome-wide association studies: gene-based MDR.
Oh S; Lee J; Kwon MS; Weir B; Ha K; Park T
BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jun; 13 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):S5. PubMed ID: 22901090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Searching Genome-Wide Multi-Locus Associations for Multiple Diseases Based on Bayesian Inference.
Guo X; Zhang J; Cai Z; Du DZ; Pan Y
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2017; 14(3):600-610. PubMed ID: 26887006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the detection ability of a range of epistasis detection methods on simulated data for pure and impure epistatic models.
Russ D; Williams JA; Cardoso VR; Bravo-Merodio L; Pendleton SC; Aziz F; Acharjee A; Gkoutos GV
PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263390. PubMed ID: 35180244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
